World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Turgut Tatlisumak

Turgut Tatlisumak

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 96 9601 9011 189 182 563 36516

Turgut Tatlisumak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Turgut Tatlisumak between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Turgut Tatlisumak published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 18.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2015. 26 of the 578 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2015. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 40 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 45 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 40 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 9 publications
1995 2025

578 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Turgut Tatlisumak: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 3
1997 3
1998 6
1999 4
2000 8
2001 2
2002 6
2003 6
2004 5
2005 5
2006 11
2007 15
2008 10
2009 18
2010 12
2011 24
2012 34
2013 40
2014 38
2015 45
2016 40
2017 40
2018 28
2019 32
2020 32
2021 40
2022 23
2023 21
2024 17
2025 9
Total 578
Download as CSV

Turgut Tatlisumak publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Turgut Tatlisumak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 563 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 563
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Turgut Tatlisumak D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Turgut Tatlisumak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 96
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Nordic Medical Prize, SalusAnsvar/Ulf Nilsonnes Foundation for Medical Research

Overview

Turgut Tatlisumak is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with 358 publications in this broad field. Within medicine, their subfields of study include neurology, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, internal medicine, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The main areas of research by Tatlisumak concentrate on neurological and cerebrovascular conditions. These include acute ischemic stroke management, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, and stroke rehabilitation and recovery.

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Tatlisumak include:

  • Katarina Jood
  • Jukka Putaala
  • Robin Lemmens
  • Daniel Strbian
  • Diana Aguiar de Sousa

Common publication venues for their work are:

  • Stroke
  • Neurology
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • European Journal of Neurology
  • European Stroke Journal

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Tatlisumak illustrate the scientific topics addressed in their research. Selected publications include:

  • "Genome-wide association study of intracranial aneurysms identifies 17 risk loci and genetic overlap with clinical risk factors" (2020), published in Nature Genetics
  • "Early versus Later Anticoagulation for Stroke with Atrial Fibrillation" (2023), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia" (2021), published in JAMA Neurology
  • "Global Differences in Risk Factors, Etiology, and Outcome of Ischemic Stroke in Young Adults-A Worldwide Meta-analysis" (2021), published in Neurology
  • "Post-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: an analysis of cases notified to the European Medicines Agency" (2021), published in European Journal of Neurology

Tatlisumak received the Nordic Medical Prize from SalusAnsvar/Ulf Nilsonnes Foundation for Medical Research in 2010.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of 1008 Consecutive Patients Aged 15 to 49 With First-Ever Ischemic Stroke The Helsinki Young Stroke Registry

    Jukka Putaala;Antti J. Metso;Tiina M. Metso;Nina Konkola

  • Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

    Robert G. Hart;Mukul Sharma;Hardi Mundl;Scott E. Kasner

  • Acute ischemic stroke: overview of major experimental rodent models, pathophysiology, and therapy of focal cerebral ischemia.

    Aysan Durukan;Turgut Tatlisumak

  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

    Thorsten Steiner;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Ronnie Beer;Hanne Christensen

  • Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis

    Atte Meretoja;Daniel Strbian;Satu Mustanoja;Turgut Tatlisumak

  • Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Bruce C V Campbell;Henry Ma;Henry Ma;Peter A Ringleb;Mark W Parsons

  • Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection

    Stéphanie Debette;Stéphanie Debette;Annette Compter;Marc-Antoine Labeyrie;Maarten Uyttenboogaart

  • Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: Consensus statement by ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update 2014/2015, supported by ESO, ESMINT, ESNR and EAN:

    Nils Wahlgren;Tiago Moreira;Patrik Michel;Thorsten Steiner

  • Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Normal Human Brains in Various Age Groups

    Johanna Helenius;Lauri Soinne;Jussi Perkiö;Oili Salonen

  • Stroke Thrombolysis Save a Minute, Save a Day

    Atte Meretoja;Mahsa Keshtkaran;Jeffrey L. Saver;Turgut Tatlisumak

  • SMASH-U A Proposal for Etiologic Classification of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Atte Meretoja;Daniel Strbian;Jukka Putaala;Sami Curtze

  • Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis: The SEDAN Score

    Daniel Strbian;Stefan Engelter;Patrik Michel;Atte Meretoja

  • Early Recurrence and Cerebral Bleeding in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation Effect of Anticoagulation and Its Timing: The RAF Study

    Maurizio Paciaroni;Giancarlo Agnelli;Nicola Falocci;Valeria Caso

  • Antiplatelets Versus Anticoagulation in Cervical Artery Dissection

    Stefan T. Engelter;Tobias Brandt;Stéphanie Debette;Valeria Caso

  • Multiancestry genome-wide association study of 520,000 subjects identifies 32 loci associated with stroke and stroke subtypes

    Rainer Malik;Ganesh Chauhan;Matthew Traylor;Muralidharan Sargurupremraj

  • The blood-brain barrier is continuously open for several weeks following transient focal cerebral ischemia.

    D Strbian;A Durukan;M Pitkonen;I Marinkovic

  • Predicting outcome of IV thrombolysis–treated ischemic stroke patients The DRAGON score

    D. Strbian;A. Meretoja;F.J. Ahlhelm;J. Pitkäniemi

  • Long-term outcome after intravenous thrombolysis of basilar artery occlusion.

    Perttu J. Lindsberg;Lauri Soinne;Turgut Tatlisumak;Risto O. Roine

  • Differential features of carotid and vertebral artery dissections: The CADISP Study

    S. Debette;C. Grond-Ginsbach;M. Bodenant;M. Kloss

  • Off-Label Thrombolysis Is Not Associated With Poor Outcome in Patients With Stroke

    Atte Meretoja;Jukka Putaala;Turgut Tatlisumak;Sari Atula

Frequent Co-Authors

Markku Kaste
Markku Kaste University of Helsinki
Atte Meretoja
Atte Meretoja Helsinki University Hospital
Stefan T. Engelter
Stefan T. Engelter University Hospital of Basel
Vincent Thijs
Vincent Thijs Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Valeria Caso
Valeria Caso University of Perugia
Patrik Michel
Patrik Michel University of Lausanne
Franz Fazekas
Franz Fazekas Medical University of Graz
Oili Salonen
Oili Salonen University of Helsinki
Didier Leys
Didier Leys University of Lille
Marc Fisher
Marc Fisher Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional pathway. Today, there are a wide variety of online healthcare degrees that open doors to in-demand roles—all from the convenience of home.

For those still in high school, programs from the best online schools for high school students can offer a head start by building foundational skills in health sciences or information management.

If you’re interested in administrative roles, you might consider certifications in medical billing and coding. Curious about expenses? Learn more about medical coding certification cost and affordable course options.

Aspiring nurses can pursue flexible and recognized qualifications by comparing the cheapest np programs online or researching how much does online nursing school cost. These programs cater to both entry-level and advanced nursing careers, helping you find a path that suits your goals and budget.

Whichever direction you choose, online healthcare degrees offer valuable alternatives for entering or advancing in the fast-growing medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Turgut Tatlisumak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles