World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 43 6995 6722 2495 2320 155 8861

Yohei Shinozuka publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yohei Shinozuka between 2003 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yohei Shinozuka published across 21 years, from 2003 to 2023, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2014. 15 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2014. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 3 publications
2003 2023

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yohei Shinozuka: publications per year, 2003 to 2023
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 5
2005 0
2006 7
2007 7
2008 2
2009 15
2010 8
2011 5
2012 7
2013 9
2014 18
2015 9
2016 8
2017 10
2018 8
2019 11
2020 10
2021 10
2022 12
2023 3
Total 165
Download as CSV

Yohei Shinozuka publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yohei Shinozuka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 155 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 155
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Yohei Shinozuka D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yohei Shinozuka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336 43
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Yohei Shinozuka is affiliated with the Bay Area Environmental Research Institute in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on atmospheric science within the broader fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences.

Shinozuka's work covers a range of topics centered on atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and atmospheric ozone and climate. Additional topics include atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, air quality and health impacts, remote sensing in agriculture, and urban heat island mitigation.

The main subfields for Shinozuka's research are Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with further contributions in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Ecology, and Environmental Engineering.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)

Collaborations have been common in Shinozuka's research, with frequent co-authors including Jens Redemann, Paquita Zuidema, Kristina Pistone, S. P. Burton, and Samuel LeBlanc.

Representative recent publications demonstrate the focus and scope of Shinozuka's work:

  • An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin (2021) published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Modeling the smoky troposphere of the southeast Atlantic: a comparison to ORACLES airborne observations from September of 2016 (2020) published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Above-cloud aerosol optical depth from airborne observations in the southeast Atlantic (2020) published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Modeled and observed properties related to the direct aerosol radiative effect of biomass burning aerosol over the southeastern Atlantic (2022) published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Exploring the elevated water vapor signal associated with the free tropospheric biomass burning plume over the southeast Atlantic Ocean (2021) published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Best Publications

  • The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 Onward. Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation

    C. A. Randles;A. M. da Silva;V. Buchard;V. Buchard;P. R. Colarco

  • Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition

    P. B. Russell;R. W. Bergstrom;Y. Shinozuka;A. D. Clarke

  • Emissions from biomass burning in the Yucatan

    R. J. Yokelson;J. D. Crounse;P. F. DeCarlo;P. F. DeCarlo;T. Karl

  • Size distributions and mixtures of dust and black carbon aerosol in Asian outflow: Physiochemistry and optical properties

    A. D. Clarke;Y. Shinozuka;V. N. Kapustin;S. Howell

  • ACE-ASIA Regional Climatic and Atmospheric Chemical Effects of Asian Dust and Pollution

    John H. Seinfeld;Gregory R. Carmichael;Richard Arimoto;William C. Conant

  • Fast airborne aerosol size and chemistry measurements above Mexico City and Central Mexico during the MILAGRO campaign

    P. F. DeCarlo;P. F. DeCarlo;E. J. Dunlea;J. R. Kimmel;A. C. Aiken

  • Biomass burning and pollution aerosol over North America: Organic components and their influence on spectral optical properties and humidification response

    A. Clarke;C. McNaughton;V. Kapustin;Y. Shinozuka

  • Characterization of Asian Dust during ACE-Asia

    R. Arimoto;Y.J. Kim;Y.P. Kim;P.K. Quinn

  • An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin

    Jens Redemann;Robert Wood;Paquita Zuidema;Sarah J. Doherty

  • Synthesis of satellite (MODIS), aircraft (ICARTT), and surface (IMPROVE, EPA-AQS, AERONET) aerosol observations over eastern North America to improve MODIS aerosol retrievals and constrain surface aerosol concentrations and sources

    Easan Drury;Easan Drury;Daniel James Jacob;Robert J. D. Spurr;Jun Wang

  • Aerosol direct radiative effects over the northwest Atlantic, northwest Pacific, and North Indian Oceans: estimates based on in-situ chemical and optical measurements and chemical transport modeling

    T. S. Bates;T. L. Anderson;T. Baynard;Tami C Bond

  • Evolution of Asian aerosols during transpacific transport in INTEX-B

    E. J. Dunlea;P. F. DeCarlo;P. F. DeCarlo;P. F. DeCarlo;A. C. Aiken;A. C. Aiken;J. R. Kimmel

  • Black carbon over Mexico: the effect of atmospheric transport on mixing state, mass absorption cross-section, and BC/CO ratios

    R. Subramanian;G. L. Kok;Darrel Baumgardner;A. D. Clarke

  • Intercomparison of biomass burning aerosol optical properties from in situ and remote-sensing instruments in ORACLES-2016

    Kristina Pistone;Jens Redemann;Sarah Doherty;Paquita Zuidema

  • The comparison of MODIS-Aqua (C5) and CALIOP (V2 & V3) aerosol optical depth

    J. Redemann;M. A. Vaughan;Q. Zhang;Y. Shinozuka

  • NASA LaRC airborne high spectral resolution lidar aerosol measurements during MILAGRO: observations and validation

    R. R. Rogers;J. W. Hair;C. A. Hostetler;R. A. Ferrare

  • Aerosol optical properties relevant to regional remote sensing of CCN activity and links to their organic mass fraction: airborne observations over Central Mexico and the US West Coast during MILAGRO/INTEX-B

    Y. Shinozuka;Y. Shinozuka;A. D. Clarke;P. F. DeCarlo;P. F. DeCarlo;J. L. Jimenez

  • Observations of heterogeneous reactions between Asian pollution and mineral dust over the Eastern North Pacific during INTEX-B

    C. S. McNaughton;A. D. Clarke;V. Kapustin;Y. Shinozuka;Y. Shinozuka

  • Revealing important nocturnal and day-to-day variations in fire smoke emissions through a multiplatform inversion

    Pablo E Saide;David A Peterson;Arlindo da Silva;Bruce Anderson

  • Influence of relative humidity upon pollution and dust during ACE‐Asia: Size distributions and implications for optical properties

    S. G. Howell;A. D. Clarke;Y. Shinozuka;V. Kapustin

  • The relationship between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and light extinction of dried particles: indications of underlying aerosol processes and implications for satellite-based CCN estimates

    Y. Shinozuka;A. D. Clarke;A. Nenes;A. Jefferson;A. Jefferson

  • Modeling the smoky troposphere of the southeast Atlantic: a comparison to ORACLES airborne observations from September of 2016

    Yohei Shinozuka;Yohei Shinozuka;Pablo E. Saide;Gonzalo A. Ferrada;Sharon P. Burton

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens Redemann
Jens Redemann University of Oklahoma
Antony D. Clarke
Antony D. Clarke University of Hawaii at Manoa
John M. Livingston
John M. Livingston SRI International
Steven G. Howell
Steven G. Howell University of Hawaii at Manoa
Sharon Burton
Sharon Burton Langley Research Center
Beat Schmid
Beat Schmid Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Chris A. Hostetler
Chris A. Hostetler Langley Research Center
Jason M. Tomlinson
Jason M. Tomlinson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Vladimir N. Kapustin
Vladimir N. Kapustin University of Hawaii at Manoa
Richard A. Ferrare
Richard A. Ferrare Langley Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring complementary online degrees can broaden career opportunities while offering flexible learning options. Many opt for a budget friendly online general studies degree to gain foundational skills without significant financial strain. These programs provide versatility, allowing learners to tailor courses toward environmental topics.

If you seek a straightforward academic path, some of the easy bachelor's degree programs can help you build essential knowledge quickly. Such degrees often emphasize practical skills, enhancing employability in environmental roles.

Specialized degrees like an online geologist degree allow in-depth study of Earth sciences, preparing graduates for careers in resource management or environmental consulting. Explore the details on geologist degree online programs that combine quality education with remote accessibility.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) proficiency is increasingly vital in environmental careers. Many colleges with gis programs offer specialized training that enhances data analysis and mapping skills essential for modern environmental scientists.

Best Scientists Citing Yohei Shinozuka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles