World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
61
Citations
8736
World Ranking
2835
National Ranking
1125

Beat Schmid publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat Schmid sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 269 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Beat Schmid D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat Schmid sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beat Schmid is affiliated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a focus on Atmospheric Science and related subfields.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric ozone and climate
  • Air quality and health impacts
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Geophysics and gravity measurements
  • Methane hydrates and related phenomena

Beat Schmid has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed research articles, with recent publications addressing various aspects of atmospheric and aerosol science. Some of these include:

  • "An evaluation of global organic aerosol schemes using airborne observations" (2020), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Aerosol and Cloud Experiments in the Eastern North Atlantic (ACE-ENA)" (2021), published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Exploring dimethyl sulfide (DMS) oxidation and implications for global aerosol radiative forcing" (2022), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "High concentration of ultrafine particles in the Amazon free troposphere produced by organic new particle formation" (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "New particle formation in the remote marine boundary layer" (2021), published in Nature Communications

The scientist frequently collaborates with several researchers in their field. Notable co-authors include Fan Mei, Jian Wang, R. A. Zaveri, Jerome D. Fast, and Maria A. Zawadowicz.

Beat Schmid's publications appear repeatedly in the following venues:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Best Publications

  • Comparison of methods for deriving aerosol asymmetry parameter

    Elisabeth Andrews;Patrick J. Sheridan;Markus Fiebig;Markus Fiebig;Allison McComiskey

  • Indirect and semi-direct aerosol campaign: The impact of Arctic aerosols on clouds

    Greg M. McFarquhar;Steven Ghan;Johannes Verlinde;Alexei Korolev

  • Comparison of Sun photometer calibration by use of the Langley technique and the standard lamp.

    Beat Schmid;Christoph Wehrli

  • Ground-Based Lidar Measurements of Aerosols During ACE-2 Instrument Description, Results, and Comparisons with Other Ground-Based and Airborne Measurements

    Ellsworth J. Welton;Kenneth J. Voss;Howard R. Gordon;Hal Maring

  • The Reno Aerosol Optics Study: An Evaluation of Aerosol Absorption Measurement Methods

    Patrick J. Sheridan;W. Patrick Arnott;John A. Ogren;Elisabeth Andrews

  • Polarimetric remote sensing of aerosols over land

    F. Waquet;Brian Cairns;Kirk D. Knobelspiesse;J. Chowdhary

  • Direct aerosol forcing: Calculation from observables and sensitivities to inputs

    Allison McComiskey;Stephen E. Schwartz;Beat Schmid;Hong Guan

  • Comparison of columnar water-vapor measurements from solar transmittance methods.

    Beat Schmid;Joseph J. Michalsky;Donald W. Slater;James C. Barnard

  • Comparison of Aerosol Optical Depth from Four Solar Radiometers During the Fall 1997 ARM Intensive Observation Period

    B. Schmid;J. Michalsky;R. Halthore;M. Beauharnois

  • Amazon boundary layer aerosol concentration sustained by vertical transport during rainfall

    Jian Wang;Radovan Krejci;Scott Giangrande;Chongai Kuang

  • Relating aerosol absorption due to soot, organic carbon, and dust to emission sources determined from in-situ chemical measurements

    Alberto Cazorla;Alberto Cazorla;R. Bahadur;Kaitlyn Suski;John F. Cahill

  • Influence of humidity on the aerosol scattering coefficient and its effect on the upwelling radiance during ACE-2

    S. Gassó;D. A. Hegg;D. S. Covert;D. Collins

  • Solar Spectral Radiative Forcing During the Southern African Regional Science Initiative

    P. Pilewskie;J. Pommier;R. Bergstrom;W. Gore

  • The ARM program's water vapor intensive observation periods - Overview, initial accomplishments, and future challenges

    H. E. Revercomb;D. D. Turner;D. D. Turner;D. C. Tobin;R. O. Knuteson

  • Estimates of the spectral aerosol single scattering albedo and aerosol radiative effects during SAFARI 2000

    Robert W. Bergstrom;Peter Pilewskie;Beat Schmid;Philip B. Russell

  • Testing the MODIS Satellite Retrieval of Aerosol Fine-Mode Fraction

    Theodore L. Anderson;Yonghua Wu;D. Allen Chu;D. Allen Chu;Beat Schmid

  • Airborne Multiwavelength High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL-2) observations during TCAP 2012: vertical profiles of optical and microphysical properties of a smoke/urban haze plume over the northeastern coast of the US

    Detlef Muller;Detlef Muller;Chris A. Hostetler;R. A. Ferrare;S. P. Burton

  • Comparison of modeled and empirical approaches for retrieving columnar water vapor from solar transmittance measurements in the 0.94‐μm region

    B. Schmid;K. J. Thorne;P. Demoulin;R. Peter

  • Clear-sky closure studies of lower tropospheric aerosol and water vapor during ACE-2 using airborne sunphotometer, airborne in-situ, space-borne, and ground-based measurements

    Beat Schmid;John M. Livingston;Philip B. Russell;Philip A. Durkee

  • Coordinated airborne, spaceborne, and ground‐based measurements of massive thick aerosol layers during the dry season in southern Africa

    B. Schmid;J. Redemann;P. B. Russell;P. V. Hobbs

  • Aerosol and Cloud Experiments in the Eastern North Atlantic (ACE-ENA)

    Jian Wang;Jian Wang;Rob Wood;Michael P. Jensen;J. Christine Chiu

  • Direct Aerosol Forcing: Calculation from Observables and Sensitivities to Inputs

    A. McComiskey;S. E. Schwartz;B. Schmid;P. Ricchiazzi

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens Redemann
Jens Redemann University of Oklahoma
John M. Livingston
John M. Livingston SRI International
Jason M. Tomlinson
Jason M. Tomlinson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Philip B. Russell
Philip B. Russell Ames Research Center
Brent N. Holben
Brent N. Holben Goddard Space Flight Center
Jennifer M. Comstock
Jennifer M. Comstock Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Yohei Shinozuka
Yohei Shinozuka Bay Area Environmental Research Institute
Ellsworth J. Welton
Ellsworth J. Welton Goddard Space Flight Center
Peter Pilewskie
Peter Pilewskie University of Colorado Boulder
Jian Wang
Jian Wang Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and enhance interdisciplinary skills. Programs such as online sociology bachelor programs offer insights into human behavior and social systems, which are essential for understanding environmental impacts on communities.

Those aiming to advance into educational leadership or specialized teaching roles might consider enrolling in best online eds to edd programs. These pathways support professionals in shaping environmental education and policy through evidence-based approaches without compromising their current careers.

For individuals seeking doctoral-level qualifications without the extensive research component, education doctoral programs without dissertation provide a practical alternative. These programs emphasize applied knowledge, which can directly impact environmental education strategies and community engagement.

Additionally, dsw programs prepare graduates to address social challenges related to environmental justice and advocacy. Pursuing these complementary degrees online can lead to rewarding careers in sustainability, policy development, and community leadership within the environmental sciences sector.

Best Scientists Citing Beat Schmid

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles