T. Chris Riley-Tillman mainly focuses on Direct Behavior Rating, Intervention, Applied psychology, Clinical psychology and School psychology. T. Chris Riley-Tillman regularly links together related areas like Social psychology in his Direct Behavior Rating studies. His Intervention course of study focuses on Behavior change and Behavior disorder, Report card and Vignette.
His Applied psychology study incorporates themes from Student engagement, Curriculum, Psychometrics and Generalizability theory. His Clinical psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both School based intervention and Sample. His work carried out in the field of School psychology brings together such families of science as Mental health, Factor structure, Self report and Graduate students.
T. Chris Riley-Tillman spends much of his time researching Direct Behavior Rating, Applied psychology, Social psychology, Intervention and Rating scale. T. Chris Riley-Tillman incorporates Direct Behavior Rating and Direct observation in his studies. T. Chris Riley-Tillman combines subjects such as Control and Behavior change with his study of Applied psychology.
His studies deal with areas such as Video technology, Data collection and Formative assessment as well as Social psychology. The study incorporates disciplines such as Psychological intervention, School psychology, Behavioral assessment and Medical education in addition to Intervention. His Rating scale research integrates issues from Reliability and At-risk students.
T. Chris Riley-Tillman mostly deals with Direct Behavior Rating, Applied psychology, Intervention, Evidence-based practice and At-risk students. His Direct Behavior Rating study combines topics in areas such as Reliability, Social psychology and Industrial engineering. The concepts of his Reliability study are interwoven with issues in Structural equation modeling, Bivariate analysis and Cognitive psychology.
He interconnects Internal validity, Multilevel model, Control and Classroom management in the investigation of issues within Applied psychology. His Intervention research includes themes of Physical therapy and Medical education. His Medical education research includes elements of School intervention, Research design, Single-subject design, Academic achievement and Educational interventions.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Evaluating Educational Interventions: Single-Case Design for Measuring Response to Intervention
T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Matthew K. Burns.
(2009)
Positive psychology goes to school: Are we there yet?
Sheila M. Clonan;Sandra M. Chafouleas;James L. McDougal;T. Chris Riley-Tillman.
Psychology in the Schools (2004)
Reconceptualizing intervention integrity: A partnership‐based framework for linking research with practice
Thomas J. Power;Jessica Blom-Hoffman;Angela T. Clarke;T. Chris Riley-Tillman.
Psychology in the Schools (2005)
Foundation for the Development and Use of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to Assess and Evaluate Student Behavior
Theodore J. Christ;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Sandra M. Chafouleas.
Assessment for Effective Intervention (2009)
Good, bad, or in‐between: How does the daily behavior report card rate?
Sandra M. Chafouleas;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;James L. McDougal.
Psychology in the Schools (2002)
Direct Behavior Rating (DBR): An Emerging Method for Assessing Social Behavior Within a Tiered Intervention System
Sandra M. Chafouleas;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Theodore J. Christ.
Assessment for Effective Intervention (2009)
Acceptability and Reported Use of Daily Behavior Report Cards among Teachers.
Sandra M. Chafouleas;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Kari A. Sassu.
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions (2006)
Assessing influences on intervention implementation: revision of the usage rating profile-intervention.
Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Sabina Rak Neugebauer;T. Chris Riley-Tillman.
Journal of School Psychology (2013)
What do daily behavior report cards (DBRCs) measure? An initial comparison of DBRCs with direct observation for off-task behavior
Sandra M. Chafouleas;James L. McDougal;T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Carlos J. Panahon.
Psychology in the Schools (2005)
Examining the Agreement of Direct Behavior Ratings and Systematic Direct Observation Data for On-Task and Disruptive Behavior.
T. Chris Riley-Tillman;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Kari A. Sassu;Julie A. M. Chanese.
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions (2008)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
University of Connecticut
State University of New York
University of Missouri
Syracuse University
University of Connecticut
University of Missouri
University of Missouri
University of Pennsylvania
University of Connecticut
University of Wisconsin–Madison
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hasso Plattner Institute
Sapienza University of Rome
Microsoft (United States)
Sichuan University
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing University of Technology
Drexel University
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
University College London
Northwest A&F University
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Sydney
New York University
University of Tulsa
Tufts University