World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7803
World Ranking
8172
National Ranking
4380

Tanya L. Eckert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tanya L. Eckert sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tanya L. Eckert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tanya L. Eckert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tanya L. Eckert is affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States and contributes to the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences. Their research spans main fields such as Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Clinical Psychology, Statistics and Probability, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work primarily addresses several topics including:

  • Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • School Psychology
  • Psychology in the Schools
  • Contemporary School Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Reading & Writing Quarterly

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on educational psychology and assessment:

  • "How Do School Psychologists Interpret Intelligence Tests for the Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities?" (2020), published in Contemporary School Psychology
  • "Performance feedback during writing instruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis." (2020), published in School Psychology
  • "Assessing children's perceptions of intervention acceptability ratings" (2021), published in Psychology in the Schools
  • "Retrospect and prospect regarding school psychology scholarship: Reflections of Lightner Witmer award winners." (2020), published in School Psychology
  • "You'll learn to love it? Examining the relationship between intervention dose and acceptability among third-grade students" (2023), published in Psychology in the Schools

They have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • John H. Kranzler
  • Kathrin E. Maki
  • Nicholas Benson
  • Randy G. Floyd
  • Sarah A. Fefer

Best Publications

  • Preschool children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: impairments in behavioral, social, and school functioning.

    George J. Dupaul;Kara E. Mcgoey;Tanya L. Eckert;John Vanbrakle

  • The Effects of School-Based Interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analysis 1996-2010.

    George J. DuPaul;Tanya L. Eckert;Brigid Vilardo

  • Transition to kindergarten: Family experiences and involvement

    Laura Lee McIntyre;Tanya L. Eckert;Barbara H. Fiese;Florence D. DiGennaro

  • A Brief Experimental Analysis For Identifying Instructional Components Needed To Improve Oral Reading Fluency.

    Edward J. Daly;Brian K. Martens;Kendra R. Hamler;Eric J. Dool

  • Extrinsic Reinforcement in the Classroom: Bribery or Best Practice

    K. Angeleque Akin-Little;Tanya L. Eckert;Benjamin J. Lovett;Steven G. Little

  • The Effects of Social Skills Curricula: Now You See Them, Now You Don't.

    George J. DuPaul;Tanya L. Eckert

  • Suicide Prevention Programs in the Schools: A Review and Public Health Perspective.

    David N. Miller;Tanya L. Eckert;James J. Mazza

  • Improving oral reading fluency: a brief experimental analysis of combining an antecedent intervention with consequences.

    Tanya L Eckert;Scott P Ardoin;Edward J Daly;Brian K Martens

  • Behavioral Conceptions and Applications of Acceptability: Issues Related to Service Delivery and Research Methodology.

    Tanya L. Eckert;John M. Hintze

  • ACADEMIC INTERVENTIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH ATTENTION‐DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

    George J. DuPaul;Tanya L. Eckert

  • Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 National Survey.

    Nicholas F. Benson;Randy G. Floyd;John H. Kranzler;Tanya L. Eckert

  • Early Intervention for Preschool-Age Children with ADHD: A Literature Review

    Kara E. McGoey;Tanya L. Eckert;George J. Dupaul

  • Teachers' perceptions of students' reading abilities: An examination of the relationship between teachers' judgments and students' performance across a continuum of rating methods.

    John C. Begeny;Tanya L. Eckert;Staci A. Montarello;Michelle S. Storie

  • Family Concerns Surrounding Kindergarten Transition: A Comparison of Students in Special and General Education

    Laura Lee McIntyre;Tanya L. Eckert;Barbara H. Fiese;Florence D. DiGennaro Reed

  • Interventions for students with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: One size does not fit all.

    George J. DuPaul;Tanya L. Eckert;Kara E. McGoey

  • Empirically evaluating the effectiveness of reading interventions: The use of brief experimental analysis and single case designs

    Tanya L. Eckert;Scott P. Ardoin;Donna M. Daisey;Mark D. Scarola

  • Children's Daily Routines During Kindergarten Transition

    Leah K. Wildenger;Laura Lee McIntyre;Barbara H. Fiese;Tanya L. Eckert

  • Assessment of mathematics and reading performance : An examination of the correspondence between direct assessment of student performance and teacher report

    Tanya L. Eckert;Erin K. Dunn;Robin S. Codding;John C. Begeny

  • EFFECTS OF REINFORCER QUALITY ON BEHAVIORAL MOMENTUM: COORDINATED APPLIED AND BASIC RESEARCH

    Floyd C. Mace;Benjamin C. Mauro;Amy E. Boyajian;Tanya L. Eckert

  • Identifying effective treatments from a brief experimental analysis: Using single-case design elements to aid decision making.

    Brian K. Martens;Tanya L. Eckert;Tracy A. Bradley;Scott P. Ardoin

Frequent Co-Authors

George J. DuPaul
George J. DuPaul Lehigh University
Brian K. Martens
Brian K. Martens Syracuse University
Barbara H. Fiese
Barbara H. Fiese University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael P. Carey
Michael P. Carey Brown University
Edward S. Shapiro
Edward S. Shapiro Lehigh University
Theodore J. Christ
Theodore J. Christ University of Minnesota
Kate B. Carey
Kate B. Carey Brown University
Peter A. Vanable
Peter A. Vanable Syracuse University
Laura Lee McIntyre
Laura Lee McIntyre University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open up various educational and professional opportunities. Students often seek flexible and affordable paths, especially with the rise of online learning. Financial considerations are crucial—many prospective students research options such as the cheapest psychology degrees in Utah or the cheapest psychology degrees in Vermont to keep education costs manageable while building a strong academic foundation.

Beyond affordability, program reputation is also important. Some regions offer excellent programs both online and on-campus. Aspiring psychologists can look into the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Charlotte and the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Washington, D.C. for guidance on quality educational options.

Earning a psychology degree online can offer the flexibility needed for working adults or those balancing family responsibilities. Graduates have diverse career pathways available, from counseling and social work to organizational psychology and research. The resources above can help you find a program that fits both your budget and career aspirations as you take your next steps in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Tanya L. Eckert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles