World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4446 4116 19 18 197 9574

Friederike Range publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Friederike Range between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Friederike Range published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2014. 26 of the 245 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2014. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 19 publications
2002 2025

245 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Friederike Range: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 3
2006 4
2007 5
2008 4
2009 19
2010 4
2011 16
2012 12
2013 13
2014 20
2015 7
2016 17
2017 18
2018 10
2019 12
2020 12
2021 10
2022 17
2023 13
2024 7
2025 19
Total 245
Download as CSV

Friederike Range publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Friederike Range sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 197
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Friederike Range D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Friederike Range sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Friederike Range is affiliated with the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna in Austria. Their research spans several fields with a significant focus on psychology and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work is rooted deeply in experimental and cognitive psychology as well as genetics and social psychology.

Their scientific contributions emphasize topics such as:

  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions

Friederike Range has authored multiple research papers, including the following notable publications:

  • Comparing wolves and dogs: current status and implications for human 'self-domestication', 2022, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted, 2020, Animal Cognition
  • Behavioural and cognitive changes in aged pet dogs: No effects of an enriched diet and lifelong training, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • What matters for cooperation? The importance of social relationship over cognition, 2020, Scientific Reports

The scientist frequently collaborates with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Sarah Marshall-Pescini
  • Giulia Cimarelli
  • Zsófia Virányi
  • Martina Lazzaroni
  • Gwendolyn Wirobski

Common publication venues where their work appears include:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Animal Cognition
  • iScience

In addition to journal articles, Friederike Range has contributed to book publications through Springer International Publishing, notably the book titled Wolves and Dogs, published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • The evolution of self-control

    Evan L. MacLean;Brian Hare;Charles L. Nunn;Elsa Addessi

  • The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs.

    Friederike Range;Lisa Horn;Zsófia Viranyi;Ludwig Huber

  • Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Free-Ranging Sooty Mangabeys (Cercocebus atys atys) from the Taï Forest, Côte d'Ivoire: Implications for the Origin of Epidemic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2

    Mario L. Santiago;Friederike Range;Brandon F. Keele;Yingying Li

  • Selective Imitation in Domestic Dogs

    Friederike Range;Zsófia Viranyi;Zsófia Viranyi;Ludwig Huber

  • Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills.

    Márta Gácsi;Borbála Gyoöri;Zsófia Virányi;Zsófia Virányi;Enikö Kubinyi

  • Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans

    Ulrike Aust;Friederike Range;Michael Steurer;Ludwig Huber

  • The Importance of the Secure Base Effect for Domestic Dogs – Evidence from a Manipulative Problem-Solving Task

    Lisa Horn;Ludwig Huber;Ludwig Huber;Friederike Range

  • The evolution of imitation: what do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation?

    Ludwig Huber;Friederike Range;Bernhard Voelkl;Andrea Szucsich

  • Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs.

    Friederike Range;Ulrike Aust;Michael Steurer;Ludwig Huber

  • Importance of a species’ socioecology: Wolves outperform dogs in a conspecific cooperation task

    Sarah Marshall-Pescini;Jonas F. L. Schwarz;Inga Kostelnik;Zsófia Virányi

  • Novel object exploration in ravens (Corvus corax): effects of social relationships.

    Mareike Stöwe;Thomas Bugnyar;Matthias-Claudio Loretto;Christian Schloegl

  • The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs

    Lucia Moretti;Marleen Hentrup;Kurt Kotrschal;Friederike Range

  • Tracking the evolutionary origins of dog-human cooperation: the "Canine Cooperation Hypothesis"

    Friederike Range;Zsófia Virányi

  • The Effect of Domestication on Inhibitory Control: Wolves and Dogs Compared

    Sarah Marshall-Pescini;Zsófia Virányi;Friederike Range

  • Familiarity and dominance relations among female sooty mangabeys in the Taï National Park

    Friederike Range;Ronald Noë

  • Development of Gaze Following Abilities in Wolves (Canis Lupus)

    Friederike Range;Zsófia Virányi

  • Birds of a feather flock together? Perceived personality matching in owner-dog dyads

    Borbála Turcsán;Friederike Range;Zsófia Virányi;Ádám Miklósi

  • Cognitive Aging in Dogs.

    Durga Chapagain;Friederike Range;Ludwig Huber;Zsófia Virányi

  • Discrimination of familiar human faces in dogs (Canis familiaris).

    Ludwig Huber;Anaïs Racca;Billy Scaf;Zsófia Virányi

  • ‘The bone is mine’: affective and referential aspects of dog growls

    Tamás Faragó;Péter Pongrácz;Friederike Range;Zsófia Virányi

  • The evolution of imitation: what do the capacities of nonhuman animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation?

    Ludwig Huber;Friederike Range;Bernhard Völkl;Andrea Szucsich

Frequent Co-Authors

Ludwig Huber
Ludwig Huber University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Sarah Marshall-Pescini University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Zsófia Virányi
Zsófia Virányi University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Kurt Kotrschal
Kurt Kotrschal University of Vienna
Ádám Miklósi
Ádám Miklósi Eötvös Loránd University
Thomas Bugnyar
Thomas Bugnyar University of Vienna
Ronald Noë
Ronald Noë University of Strasbourg
Márta Gácsi
Márta Gácsi Eötvös Loránd University
József Topál
József Topál Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Erich Möstl
Erich Möstl University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in psychology or a related field, exploring online degree programs can provide flexibility and access to diverse specializations. Among the most in-demand roles is that of a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which involves using behavioral principles to help individuals improve important life skills.

Becoming a BCBA requires rigorous education, supervised fieldwork, and passing a national exam. The bcba certification requirements in San Antonio offer a detailed look into the prerequisites and essential steps needed to pursue this credential. Likewise, you can discover the specifics of the San Diego bcba requirements, which outline coursework and licensure essentials unique to that location.

For those interested in California, understanding the San Francisco bcba education requirements provides insight into local educational standards and opportunities. Additionally, resources on how to become a bcba in San Jose can help guide your academic planning and career decisions.

By researching different requirements and pathways, you can tailor your education to best fit your career goals in psychology and behavioral science fields.

Best Scientists Citing Friederike Range

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles