World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Bugnyar

Thomas Bugnyar

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4074 3759 17 16 180 10250

Thomas Bugnyar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Bugnyar between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Bugnyar published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2022. 20 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2022. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 16 publications
1976 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Bugnyar: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 2
2003 0
2004 2
2005 2
2006 6
2007 8
2008 8
2009 2
2010 7
2011 5
2012 13
2013 7
2014 13
2015 9
2016 17
2017 20
2018 9
2019 12
2020 16
2021 14
2022 21
2023 8
2024 4
2025 16
Total 225
Download as CSV

Thomas Bugnyar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Bugnyar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 180
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Bugnyar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Bugnyar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Bugnyar is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and agricultural and biological sciences, with a concentrated contribution to social psychology and ecology-related subfields. Bugnyar's work intersects significantly with areas such as ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, developmental biology, and studies involving small animals.

Their main topics of study include primate behavior and ecology, animal behavior and reproduction, animal vocal communication and behavior, animal behavior and welfare studies, human-animal interaction studies, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, and wildlife ecology and conservation.

Bugnyar's recent publications reveal ongoing research interests across these domains. Noteworthy papers include:

  • "Socio-ecological correlates of neophobia in corvids" (2021, Current Biology)
  • "Prosociality, social tolerance and partner choice facilitate mutually beneficial cooperation in common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus" (2021, Animal Behaviour)
  • "Sex-specific effects of cooperative breeding and colonial nesting on prosociality in corvids" (2020, eLife)
  • "Dominance in a socially dynamic setting: hierarchical structure and conflict dynamics in ravens' foraging groups" (2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences)
  • "Beyond the dichotomy between field and lab - the importance of studying cognition in context" (2022, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences)

Collaborative work is a significant aspect of Bugnyar's research, with frequent coauthors including Jorg J. M. Massen, Palmyre H. Boucherie, Vedrana Šlipogor, Lisa Horn, and Christian R. Blum. This network indicates active engagement with scholars contributing to various aspects of animal cognition and behavior.

Their work has appeared predominantly in venues such as Animal Behaviour and Animal Cognition, each featuring seven publications, alongside multiple contributions to Scientific Reports, Royal Society Open Science, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Bugnyar has also contributed to academic literature through a book published by Cambridge University Press titled The Cambridge Handbook of Animal Cognition (2021), which has garnered citations within the field.

Best Publications

  • Cognition without Cortex

    Onur Güntürkün;Thomas Bugnyar

  • Observational learning and the raiding of food caches in ravens, Corvus corax : Is it "tactical" deception?

    Thomas Bugnyar;Kurt Kotrschal

  • Social Cognition and the Evolution of Language: Constructing Cognitive Phylogenies

    W. Tecumseh Fitch;Ludwig Huber;Thomas Bugnyar

  • Ravens, Corvus corax, differentiate between knowledgeable and ignorant competitors

    Thomas Bugnyar;Bernd Heinrich

  • Ravens, Corvus corax, follow gaze direction of humans around obstacles

    Thomas Bugnyar;Mareike Stöwe;Bernd Heinrich

  • Ravens attribute visual access to unseen competitors

    Thomas Bugnyar;Stephan Alexander Reber;Stephan Alexander Reber;Cameron Buckner

  • Push or pull: an experimental study on imitation in marmosets

    Thomas Bugnyar;Ludwig Huber

  • Do Ravens Show Consolation? Responses to Distressed Others

    Orlaith N. Fraser;Thomas Bugnyar

  • Pilfering ravens, Corvus corax, adjust their behaviour to social context and identity of competitors.

    Thomas Bugnyar;Thomas Bugnyar;Bernd Heinrich

  • Testing Problem Solving in Ravens: String-Pulling to Reach Food

    Bernd Heinrich;Thomas Bugnyar

  • Food calling in ravens: are yells referential signals?

    Thomas Bugnyar;Maartje Kijne;Kurt Kotrschal

  • Long-Term Memory for Affiliates in Ravens

    Markus Boeckle;Thomas Bugnyar

  • The quality of social relationships in ravens

    Orlaith N. Fraser;Thomas Bugnyar

  • Novel object exploration in ravens (Corvus corax): effects of social relationships.

    Mareike Stöwe;Thomas Bugnyar;Matthias-Claudio Loretto;Christian Schloegl

  • Gaze following in the red-footed tortoise (Geochelone carbonaria)

    Anna Wilkinson;Isabella Mandl;Thomas Bugnyar;Ludwig Huber

  • The use of referential gestures in ravens ( Corvus corax ) in the wild

    Simone Pika;Thomas Bugnyar

  • Gaze following in common ravens, Corvus corax: ontogeny and habituation

    Christian Schloegl;Kurt Kotrschal;Thomas Bugnyar

  • Tolerance and reward equity predict cooperation in ravens (Corvus corax)

    Jorg J. M. Massen;Caroline Ritter;Thomas Bugnyar;Thomas Bugnyar

  • Knower–guesser differentiation in ravens: others' viewpoints matter

    Thomas Bugnyar

  • Ravens Reconcile after Aggressive Conflicts with Valuable Partners

    Orlaith N. Fraser;Thomas Bugnyar

  • Ravens judge competitors through experience with play caching.

    Thomas Bugnyar;Thomas Bugnyar;Christine Schwab;Christian Schloegl;Kurt Kotrschal

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Kotrschal
Kurt Kotrschal University of Vienna
Bernd Heinrich
Bernd Heinrich University of Vermont
Ludwig Huber
Ludwig Huber University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
W. Tecumseh Fitch
W. Tecumseh Fitch University of Vienna
Friederike Range
Friederike Range University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Thomas Mussweiler
Thomas Mussweiler London Business School
Josep Call
Josep Call University of St Andrews
Onur Güntürkün
Onur Güntürkün Ruhr University Bochum
Judith M. Burkart
Judith M. Burkart University of Zurich
Claus Lamm
Claus Lamm University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Psychology in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and rewarding careers. A popular pathway is mental health counseling, with each state and city having unique requirements for licensure. For example, Washington DC mental health counselor education requirements include a specific number of graduate credits and supervised experience. Similarly, those interested in Kansas should review the mental health counselor requirements in Wichita if planning to practice there.

If your career goals lead you to North Carolina, check the steps on how to become a mental health counselor in Winston Salem. Additionally, students interested in behavioral analysis can consider training as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. Knowing the average bcba salary united states is valuable for evaluating long-term career prospects.

Online degrees in psychology and related fields offer flexibility and access to these diverse, growing careers. Research requirements and earning potential by location to make informed decisions on your educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Bugnyar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles