World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 89 994 869 122 111 286 31865

Richard W. Byrne publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard W. Byrne between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard W. Byrne published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2014. 3 of the 466 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2014. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1973 2025

466 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard W. Byrne: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 3
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 3
1987 2
1988 6
1989 4
1990 6
1991 7
1992 6
1993 10
1994 2
1995 17
1996 4
1997 7
1998 5
1999 8
2000 7
2001 11
2002 12
2003 7
2004 6
2005 7
2006 14
2007 16
2008 10
2009 14
2010 24
2011 13
2012 15
2013 25
2014 27
2015 19
2016 24
2017 21
2018 19
2019 14
2020 16
2021 19
2022 18
2023 6
2024 1
2025 2
Total 466
Download as CSV

Richard W. Byrne publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Byrne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 286 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 286
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard W. Byrne D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Byrne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83 89
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Richard W. Byrne is affiliated with Rush University Medical Center in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Neurology, Surgery, Genetics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research mainly addresses topics such as meningioma and schwannoma management, head and neck surgical oncology, cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus, epilepsy research and treatment, neurofibromatosis and schwannoma cases, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, as well as spinal dysraphism and malformations.

Recent significant publications authored or coauthored by the scientist include:

  • Are ape gestures like words? Outstanding issues in detecting similarities and differences between human language and ape gesture, 2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Context, not sequence order, affects the meaning of bonobo (Pan paniscus) gestures, 2020, Gesture
  • Using natural travel paths to infer and compare primate cognition in the wild, 2021, iScience
  • Responsive Neurostimulation of the Mesial Temporal White Matter in Bilateral Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, 2020, Neurosurgery
  • Resection of vestibular schwannomas after stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review, 2020, Journal of neurosurgery

Richard W. Byrne has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Ravi S. Nunna
  • Bledi Brahimaj
  • R. Mark Wiet
  • Syed Khalid
  • Sepehr Sani

The scientist has contributed to multiple research articles published in various venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Journal of Biocommunication
  • Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
  • Journal of neurosurgery
  • World Neurosurgery

Richard W. Byrne's work encompasses a range of research themes within clinical and surgical neurology. Their involvement in epilepsy research and treatment is notable, as is their engagement with complex surgical oncology related to head and neck neoplasms. Additionally, they have investigated cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and disorders such as hydrocephalus, along with multiple neurovascular and developmental conditions affecting the central nervous system.

Best Publications

  • Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans.

    James R. Anderson;Richard Byrne;Andrew Whiten

  • Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans

    Richard W. Byrne;Andrew Whiten

  • The Thinking Ape: Evolutionary Origins of Intelligence

    Richard W. Byrne

  • Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach

    Richard W. Byrne;Anne E. Russon

  • Cultural learning. Author's reply

    K. A. Bard;S. Baron-Cohen;B. J. Moore;C. Boesch

  • Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extensions and Evaluations

    Andrew Whiten;Richard W. Byrne

  • Tactical deception in primates.

    A. Whiten;R. W. Byrne

  • Neocortex size predicts deception rate in primates.

    Richard W. Byrne;Nadia Corp

  • The gestural repertoire of the wild chimpanzee.

    Catherine Hobaiter;Richard W. Byrne

  • Memory for urban geography

    R. W. Byrne

  • The Meanings of Chimpanzee Gestures

    Catherine Hobaiter;Richard W. Byrne

  • Hand Preferences in the Skilled Gathering Tasks of Mountain Gorillas (Gorilla g. berengei)

    R.W. Byrne;J.M. Byrne

  • Cognitive Evolution in Primates: Evidence from Tactical Deception

    R. W. Byrne;A. Whiten

  • The evolution of intelligence.

    R. W. Byrne

  • Orangutans Modify Their Gestural Signaling According to Their Audience's Comprehension

    Erica A. Cartmill;Richard W. Byrne

  • Gestural communication of the gorilla (Gorilla gorilla): repertoire, intentionality and possible origins

    Emilie Juliette Pauline Genty;Thomas Breuer;Catherine Louise Hobaiter;Richard William Byrne

  • Representation of action through iconic gesture in a captive lowland gorilla

    Joanne E. Tanner;Richard W. Byrne

  • Ecology, feeding competition and social structure in baboons

    Robert A Barton;Richard W Byrne;Andrew Whiten

  • Animal Tool-Use

    Amanda Seed;Richard Byrne

  • Complex leaf-gathering skills of mountain gorillas (Gorilla g. beringei): Variability and standardization.

    Richard W. Byrne;Jennifer M. E. Byrne

  • Poor drug distribution as a possible explanation for the results of the PRECISE trial.

    John H. Sampson;Gary Archer;Christoph Pedain;Eva Wembacher-Schröder

  • Imitation as behaviour parsing.

    R.W. Byrne

  • A lifetime psychiatric history predicts a worse seizure outcome following temporal lobectomy

    A. M. Kanner;R. Byrne;A. Chicharro;J. Wuu

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Whiten
Andrew Whiten University of St Andrews
Catherine Hobaiter
Catherine Hobaiter University of St Andrews
Michael Mendl
Michael Mendl University of Bristol
Klaus Zuberbühler
Klaus Zuberbühler University of Neuchâtel
Andres M. Kanner
Andres M. Kanner University of Miami
Martin J. Whiting
Martin J. Whiting Macquarie University
David J. Straus
David J. Straus Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Robert A. Barton
Robert A. Barton Durham University
Richard W. Wrangham
Richard W. Wrangham Harvard University
Ádám Miklósi
Ádám Miklósi Eötvös Loránd University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a variety of specializations and professional pathways. One increasingly popular option is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Each state and city may have distinct steps and certification requirements, so researching your target location is essential.

For example, you can learn how to become an mft in Anchorage or discover specific mft requirements in Arlington. If you are considering practice in the Southeast, understanding Atlanta mft certification requirements will ensure you meet local standards. Similarly, those interested in Colorado can review how to become an mft in Aurora.

Many universities offer online degrees in psychology and counseling, making it easier for students to gain foundational knowledge and flexible training. By exploring regional requirements and accredited online programs, you can confidently pursue an MFT career that adapts to your goals and location.

Best Scientists Citing Richard W. Byrne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles