World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4876 4517 345 331 118 14898

Margaret Cargo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Margaret Cargo between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Margaret Cargo published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2017. 3 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2017. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1991 2025

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Margaret Cargo: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 5
2004 4
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 6
2009 2
2010 3
2011 11
2012 8
2013 8
2014 5
2015 9
2016 6
2017 12
2018 7
2019 4
2020 3
2021 5
2022 6
2023 2
2024 0
2025 3
Total 124
Download as CSV

Margaret Cargo publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Cargo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 118
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Margaret Cargo D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Cargo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Margaret Cargo is affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia. Their research spans across health professions and social sciences, with a focus on several specialized subfields including general health professions, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, management science and operations research, and transportation.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Traffic and Road Safety

Margaret Cargo has contributed to numerous publications, frequently publishing in venues such as:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Health Promotion Journal of Australia
  • Journal of Transport & Health
  • Health Research Policy and Systems
  • Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Their recent papers include:

  • "How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field" (2020) in Health Research Policy and Systems
  • "Evaluation approaches, tools and aspects of implementation used in pharmacist interventions in residential aged care facilities: A scoping review" (2022) in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
  • "Identifying Environmental Determinants Relevant to Health and Wellbeing in Remote Australian Indigenous Communities: A Scoping Review of Grey Literature" (2021) in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Changing Primary School Children's Engagement in Active School Travel Using Safe Routes to School Interventions: A Rapid Realist Review" (2022) in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "The dichotomy of commissioning Indigenous health and wellbeing program evaluations: What the Funder wants vs what the Community needs" (2021) in Health Promotion Journal of Australia

Margaret Cargo frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Jenni Judd
  • Mark Daniel
  • James A. Smith
  • Amohia Boulton
  • Yvette Roe

Best Publications

  • The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018 for Information Professionals and Researchers.

    Quan Nha Hong;Sergi Fàbregues;Gillian Bartlett;Felicity Boardman

  • The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening Its Practice*‡

    Margaret Cargo;Shawna L. Mercer

  • Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice

    Justin Jagosh;Ann C. Macaulay;Pierre Pluye;Jon Salsberg

  • Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study.

    Quan Nha Hong;Pierre Pluye;Sergi Fàbregues;Gillian Bartlett

  • Healing traditions: culture, community and mental health promotion with Canadian Aboriginal peoples

    Laurence Kirmayer;Cori Simpson;Margaret Cargo

  • A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects

    Justin Jagosh;Paula L. Bush;Jon Salsberg;Ann C. Macaulay

  • Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings

    Jane Noyes;Andrew Booth;Kate Flemming;Ruth Garside

  • Implementing participatory intervention and research in communities: lessons from the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project in Canada.

    Louise Potvin;Margaret Cargo;Alex M McComber;Treena Delormier

  • Empowerment as Fostering Positive Youth Development and Citizenship.

    Margaret Cargo;Garry D. Grams;Judith M. Ottoson;Patricia Ward

  • Critical reflections on realist review: insights from customizing the methodology to the needs of participatory research assessment

    Justin Jagosh;Pierre Pluye;Geoff Wong;Margaret Cargo

  • Impact of a diabetes prevention program on body size, physical activity, and diet among Kanien'keha:ka (Mohawk) children 6 to 11 years old: 8-year results from the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project.

    Gilles Paradis;Lucie Lévesque;Ann C. Macaulay;Margaret Cargo

  • Overweight and obese adolescents: what turns them off physical activity?

    Ivana Stankov;Timothy Olds;Margaret Cargo

  • Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis.

    Janet L. Harris;Andrew Booth;Margaret Cargo;Karin Hannes

  • Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review.

    Justin Jagosh;Pierre Pluye;Ann C Macaulay;Jon Salsberg

  • Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 1: introduction.

    Jane Noyes;Andrew Booth;Margaret Cargo;Kate Flemming

  • Qualitative evidence

    Unknown

  • Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 5: methods for integrating qualitative and implementation evidence within intervention effectiveness reviews

    Angela Harden;James Thomas;Margaret Cargo;Janet Harris

  • Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 6: reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses.

    Katherine Ann Flemming;Andrew Booth;Karin Hannes;M Cargo

  • Context as a Fundamental Dimension of Health Promotion Program Evaluation

    Blake Poland;Katherine L. Frohlich;Margaret Cargo

  • Suicide Among Inuit: Results From a Large, Epidemiologically Representative Follow-Back Study in Nunavut.

    Eduardo Chachamovich;Laurence J Kirmayer;John M Haggarty;Margaret Cargo

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Daniel
Mark Daniel University of Canberra
Ann C. Macaulay
Ann C. Macaulay McGill University
Lawrence W. Green
Lawrence W. Green University of California, San Francisco
Andrew Booth
Andrew Booth University of Sheffield
Pierre Pluye
Pierre Pluye McGill University
Louise Potvin
Louise Potvin University of Montreal
Angela Harden
Angela Harden City, University of London
Michael Saini
Michael Saini University of Toronto
Geoff Wong
Geoff Wong University of Oxford
Trisha Greenhalgh
Trisha Greenhalgh University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities online offers flexible and accessible options for career-driven students. Many are turning to specialized programs, such as affordable msw programs online, to gain advanced skills in social work while managing costs.

For those interested in psychology or behavior analysis, there are accredited bcba programs online that prepare graduates for certification and licensure in high-demand fields. Accelerated pathways are also increasingly popular. With options like online accelerated msw programs and online accelerated psychology degree tracks, students can fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner.

Online learning in these areas is ideal for working professionals or career changers who need convenience and speed. These degrees open doors to roles in counseling, social work, education, research, and public policy, making them valuable investments in today's job market.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret Cargo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles