| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 45 | 3759 | 3465 | 645 | 593 | 156 | 14221 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Geoff Wong between 2001 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Geoff Wong published across 21 years, from 2001 to 2021, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2016. 37 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.
165 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2001 | 1 |
| 2002 | 2 |
| 2003 | 7 |
| 2004 | 3 |
| 2005 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2 |
| 2009 | 5 |
| 2010 | 3 |
| 2011 | 7 |
| 2012 | 3 |
| 2013 | 12 |
| 2014 | 18 |
| 2015 | 9 |
| 2016 | 22 |
| 2017 | 10 |
| 2018 | 11 |
| 2019 | 12 |
| 2020 | 19 |
| 2021 | 18 |
| Total | 165 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoff Wong sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 156 publications — 45th percentile
45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 44–53 | 28 | |
| 54–63 | 61 | |
| 64–73 | 161 | |
| 74–83 | 225 | |
| 84–93 | 301 | |
| 94–103 | 390 | |
| 104–113 | 406 | |
| 114–123 | 474 | |
| 124–133 | 453 | |
| 134–143 | 434 | |
| 144–153 | 407 | |
| 154–163 | 411 | 156 |
| 164–173 | 391 | |
| 174–183 | 313 | |
| 184–193 | 319 | |
| 194–203 | 304 | |
| 204–213 | 285 | |
| 214–223 | 246 | |
| 224–233 | 213 | |
| 234–243 | 170 | |
| 244–253 | 167 | |
| 254–263 | 162 | |
| 264–273 | 138 | |
| 274–283 | 138 | |
| 284–293 | 113 | |
| 294–303 | 106 | |
| 304–313 | 95 | |
| 314–323 | 101 | |
| 324–333 | 81 | |
| 334–343 | 69 | |
| 344–353 | 56 | |
| 354–363 | 36 | |
| 364–373 | 42 | |
| 374–383 | 41 | |
| 384–393 | 44 | |
| 394–403 | 27 | |
| 404–413 | 30 | |
| 414–423 | 20 | |
| 424–433 | 29 | |
| 434–443 | 29 | |
| 444–453 | 25 | |
| 454–463 | 19 | |
| 464–473 | 21 | |
| 474–483 | 11 | |
| 484–493 | 17 | |
| 494–503 | 7 | |
| 504–513 | 6 | |
| 514–523 | 12 | |
| 524–533 | 10 | |
| 534–543 | 7 | |
| 544–553 | 6 | |
| 554–563 | 12 | |
| 564–569 | 8 | |
| 570+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoff Wong sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile
52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 177 | |
| 31 | 210 | |
| 32 | 222 | |
| 33 | 188 | |
| 34 | 181 | |
| 35 | 243 | |
| 36 | 261 | |
| 37 | 272 | |
| 38 | 278 | |
| 39 | 300 | |
| 40 | 297 | |
| 41 | 308 | |
| 42 | 313 | |
| 43 | 300 | |
| 44 | 269 | |
| 45 | 260 | 45 |
| 46 | 228 | |
| 47 | 251 | |
| 48 | 203 | |
| 49 | 186 | |
| 50 | 187 | |
| 51 | 166 | |
| 52 | 138 | |
| 53 | 141 | |
| 54 | 131 | |
| 55 | 137 | |
| 56 | 109 | |
| 57 | 129 | |
| 58 | 95 | |
| 59 | 105 | |
| 60 | 106 | |
| 61 | 86 | |
| 62 | 94 | |
| 63 | 77 | |
| 64 | 79 | |
| 65 | 59 | |
| 66 | 68 | |
| 67 | 51 | |
| 68 | 49 | |
| 69 | 40 | |
| 70 | 43 | |
| 71 | 40 | |
| 72 | 50 | |
| 73 | 46 | |
| 74 | 43 | |
| 75 | 45 | |
| 76 | 45 | |
| 77 | 30 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 31 | |
| 80 | 29 | |
| 81 | 18 | |
| 82 | 21 | |
| 83 | 26 | |
| 84 | 15 | |
| 85 | 15 | |
| 86 | 19 | |
| 87 | 19 | |
| 88 | 12 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 19 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 13 | |
| 93 | 9 | |
| 94 | 13 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 7 | |
| 97 | 6 | |
| 98 | 6 | |
| 99 | 6 | |
| 100+ | 97 |
Geoff Wong;Trish Greenhalgh;Gill Westhorp;Jeanette Buckingham
Justin Jagosh;Ann C. Macaulay;Pierre Pluye;Jon Salsberg
Geoff Wong;Trish Greenhalgh;Gill Westhorp;Jeanette Buckingham
Geoff Wong;Gill Westhorp;Ana Manzano;Joanne Greenhalgh
Justin Jagosh;Paula L. Bush;Jon Salsberg;Ann C. Macaulay
Trisha Greenhalgh;Henry W W Potts;Geoff Wong;Pippa Bark
Geoff Wong;Trisha Greenhalgh;Ray Pawson
Geoff Wong;Trisha Greenhalgh;Gill Westhorp;Ray Pawson
H. E. Brown;A. J. Atkin;J. Panter;G. Wong
Sasha Shepperd;Simon Lewin;Sharon Straus;Mike Clarke;Mike Clarke
Trisha Greenhalgh;Geoff Wong;Gill Westhorp;Ray Pawson
Geoff Wong;Trish Greenhalgh;Gill Westhorp;Ray Pawson
Bruno Marchal;Gill Westhorp;Geoff Wong;Sara Van Belle
Ray Pawson;Geoff Wong;Lesley Owen
Stephanie Tierney;Geoff Wong;Nia Roberts;Anne-Marie Boylan
Trish Greenhalgh;Geoff Wong;Justin Jagosh;Joanne Greenhalgh
Justin Jagosh;Pierre Pluye;Geoff Wong;Margaret Cargo
Geoff Wong;Gillian Westhorp;Joanne Greenhalgh;Ana Manzano
Monika Kastner;Roberta Cardoso;Yonda Lai;Victoria Treister
Justin Jagosh;Pierre Pluye;Ann C Macaulay;Jon Salsberg
Irene H. Yen;Johnna Fandel Flood;Hannah Thompson;Lynda A. Anderson
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring a career in Social Sciences or Humanities opens up a wide range of opportunities—and online degree programs make it more accessible than ever. For those seeking an advanced qualification in the shortest possible time, a 1 year online master's in social work can fast-track your journey to working in social services or clinical roles.
If you're interested in psychology, an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree provides a quicker route to careers in counseling, mental health services, or continuing to graduate study.
For those focusing on counseling, choosing cacrep accredited schools ensures your degree meets the highest professional standards, which is essential for licensure and employment.
Interested in supporting families and couples? A mft degree online allows you to specialize in marriage and family therapy, paving the way to impactful work in community agencies or private practice.
Online programs offer flexibility, but it's vital to make informed choices about accreditation, program length, and career goals for long-term success.
WILUS Inc.
University of Wollongong
Hamamatsu University
University of Strasbourg
Xi'an Jiaotong University
National University of La Plata
Nzytech (Portugal)
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Université Catholique de Louvain
École de Technologie Supérieure
University of Rochester
University of Bergen
KU Leuven
University of British Columbia
Tohoku University
University of Southern California
