World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
10799
World Ranking
5520
National Ranking
924

Joanne Greenhalgh publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne Greenhalgh sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 133 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Joanne Greenhalgh D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne Greenhalgh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research

    Bryce B. Reeve;Kathleen W. Wyrwich;Albert W. Wu;Galina Velikova

  • What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation

    Sonia Michelle Dalkin;Joanne Greenhalgh;Diana Jones;Bill Cunningham

  • Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations

    Claire F. Snyder;Neil K. Aaronson;Ali K. Choucair;Thomas E. Elliott

  • RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations

    Geoff Wong;Gill Westhorp;Ana Manzano;Joanne Greenhalgh

  • Doctors' perceptions of the links between stress and lowered clinical care

    Jenny Firth-Cozens;Joanne Greenhalgh

  • How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis

    Joanne Greenhalgh;Kate Gooding;Kate Gooding;Elizabeth Gibbons;Sonia Dalkin;Sonia Dalkin

  • The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research

    Maria B Boyce;John P Browne;Joanne Greenhalgh

  • The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory?

    Joanne Greenhalgh;Andrew F Long;Rob Flynn

  • The effectiveness of the use of patient‐based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review

    Joanne Greenhalgh;Keith Meadows

  • Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient‑reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings

    Angela M Stover;Lotte Haverman;Hedy A van Oers;Joanne Greenhalgh

  • Accessing Socially Excluded People — Trust and the Gatekeeper in the Researcher-Participant Relationship

    Nick Emmel;Kahryn Hughes;Joanne Greenhalgh;Adam Sales

  • Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care

    Joanne Greenhalgh;Sonia Dalkin;Kate Gooding;Elizabeth Gibbons

  • Understanding ‘context’ in realist evaluation and synthesis

    Joanne Greenhalgh;Ana Manzano

  • Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: evidence, challenges and opportunities

    Ian Porter;Daniela Gonçalves-Bradley;Ignacio Ricci-Cabello;Chris Gibbons

  • Clinical and cost-effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy for depressive illness, schizophrenia, catatonia and mania: systematic reviews and economic modelling studies

    Joanne Greenhalgh;Christopher Knight;D Hind;C Beverley

  • Protocol-the RAMESES II study: Developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation

    Trish Greenhalgh;Geoff Wong;Justin Jagosh;Joanne Greenhalgh

  • Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice

    Chris Gibbons;Ian Porter;Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley;Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley;Stanimir Stoilov

  • Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project

    Geoff Wong;Gillian Westhorp;Joanne Greenhalgh;Ana Manzano

  • Reviewing and selecting outcome measures for use in routine practice

    Joanne Greenhalgh;Andrew F. Long;Alison J. Brettle;Maria J. Grant

  • How do aggregated patient-reported outcome measures data stimulate health care improvement? A realist synthesis.

    Joanne Greenhalgh;Sonia Dalkin;Elizabeth Gibbons;Judy Wright

  • User’s Guide to Implementing Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice

    Neil Aaronson;Thomas Elliott;Joanne Greenhalgh

Frequent Co-Authors

Ray Pawson
Ray Pawson University of Leeds
Nick Black
Nick Black London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Martin Roland
Martin Roland University of Cambridge
Ellen Nolte
Ellen Nolte London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Robert C. Anderson
Robert C. Anderson California Institute of Technology
Neil K. Aaronson
Neil K. Aaronson Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Mamas A. Mamas
Mamas A. Mamas Keele University
Geoff Wong
Geoff Wong University of Oxford
Justin Waring
Justin Waring University of Birmingham
Bryce B. Reeve
Bryce B. Reeve Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education is transforming the way students pursue Social Sciences and Humanities degrees in the USA. Many accredited institutions now offer 1 year graduate programs for those looking to fast-track their master's studies, making it easier to balance education with work or family commitments.

For undergraduates, accelerated degree programs provide an efficient path to earning a bachelor’s degree in less time than traditional routes. These flexible formats allow motivated learners to enter the workforce or advance their education more quickly.

Affordability is another key concern. Social work and behavior analysis are popular career pathways with strong demand, and students often seek the most economical education routes. Consider exploring the cheapest msw programs online if you're interested in a master’s in social work, or the cheapest bcba online program for an affordable route toward Board Certified Behavior Analyst certification.

Whether your goal is a fast degree or a cost-effective credential, online options make launching your Social Sciences and Humanities career more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Joanne Greenhalgh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles