World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
131
Citations
74343
World Ranking
2369
National Ranking
1335

Albert W. Wu publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert W. Wu sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 563 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Albert W. Wu D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert W. Wu sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 131 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Albert W. Wu is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio primarily focused on Health Professions and Medicine. Their work intersects multiple subfields, including General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, as well as Clinical Psychology.

Their research covers several prominent topics with a significant number of publications addressing Patient Safety and Medication Errors, Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues, Healthcare Professionals' Stress and Burnout, Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Disaster Response and Management, and Healthcare Cost, Quality, and Practices.

Albert W. Wu has published in numerous respected venues, frequently contributing to the Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management with 28 publications. They have also published in Nature Medicine, the Journal of General Internal Medicine, the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, and Quality of Life Research.

Frequent collaborators include Isolde Martina Busch, Cheryl Connors, Francesca Moretti, Michela Rimondini, and Claire Snyder, each contributing to multiple co-authored works.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Albert W. Wu include:

  • COVID-19: Peer Support and Crisis Communication Strategies to Promote Institutional Resilience, 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Prospective, multi-site study of patient outcomes after implementation of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system for sepsis, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • A Randomized Trial of a Multifactorial Strategy to Prevent Serious Fall Injuries, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Human-machine teaming is key to AI adoption: clinicians' experiences with a deployed machine learning system, 2022, npj Digital Medicine
  • Patient reported outcome assessment must be inclusive and equitable, 2022, Nature Medicine

Best Publications

  • Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement

    Michael D. Cabana;Cynthia S. Rand;Neil R. Powe;Albert W. Wu

  • Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance.

    Cynthia M. Boyd;Jonathan Darer;Chad Boult;Linda P. Fried

  • The Effectiveness of Right Heart Catheterization in the Initial Care of Critically Ill Patients

    Alfred F. Connors;Theodore Speroff;Neal V. Dawson;Charles Thomas

  • The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

    Connors Af;Speroff T;Dawson Nv;Thomas C

  • Medical error: the second victim: The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too

    Albert W Wu

  • Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral medications among participants in HIV clinical trials: The AACTG Adherence Instruments

    Margaret A. Chesney;J. R. Ickovics;D. B. Chambers;A. L. Gifford

  • Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures.

    Gordon H. Guyatt;David Osoba;Albert W. Wu;Kathleen W. Wyrwich

  • Noncardiac comorbidity increases preventable hospitalizations and mortality among medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure

    Joel B Braunstein;Gerard F Anderson;Gary Gerstenblith;Wendy Weller

  • Do house officers learn from their mistakes

    A W Wu;S Folkman;S J McPhee;B Lo

  • Perceptions by Family Members of the Dying Experience of Older and Seriously Ill Patients

    Joanne Lynn;Joan M. Teno;Russell S. Phillips;Albert W. Wu

  • ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research

    Bryce B. Reeve;Kathleen W. Wyrwich;Albert W. Wu;Galina Velikova

  • A health status questionnaire using 30 items from the Medical Outcomes Study. Preliminary validation in persons with early HIV infection

    Albert W. Wu;Haya R. Rubin;William C. Mathews;John E. Ware Jr.

  • The Impact of Serious Illness on Patients' Families

    Kenneth E. Covinsky;Kenneth E. Covinsky;Lee Goldman;E. Francis Cook;Robert Oye

  • Medical error: the second victim

    Albert W Wu

  • Self-reported symptoms and medication side effects influence adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in persons with HIV infection.

    Adriana Ammassari;Rita Murri;Patrizio Pezzotti;Maria Paola Trotta

  • Correlates and predictors of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: overview of published literature.

    Adriana Ammassari;Maria Paola Trotta;Rita Murri;Francesco Castelli

  • Evidence for reliability, validity and usefulness of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV)

    A. W. Wu;D. A. Revicki;D. Jacobson;F. E. Malitz

  • Incidents relating to the intra-hospital transfer of critically ill patients. An analysis of the reports submitted to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care.

    Ursula Beckmann;Donna M. Gillies;Sean M. Berenholtz;Albert W. Wu

  • A Controlled Trial of Early Adjunctive Treatment with Corticosteroids for Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

    S A Bozzette;F R Sattler;J Chiu;A W Wu

  • The Quality of Well-being Scale. Applications in AIDS, cystic fibrosis, and arthritis.

    Robert M. Kaplan;John P. Anderson;Albert W. Wu;W. M. Christopher Mathews

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. Pronovost
Peter J. Pronovost Case Western Reserve University
Joanne Lynn
Joanne Lynn Altarum Institute
Russell S. Phillips
Russell S. Phillips Harvard University
Jodi B. Segal
Jodi B. Segal Johns Hopkins University
Alfred F. Connors
Alfred F. Connors Case Western Reserve University
Joan M. Teno
Joan M. Teno Brown University
Eric B. Bass
Eric B. Bass Johns Hopkins University
Neil R. Powe
Neil R. Powe University of California, San Francisco
Frank E. Harrell
Frank E. Harrell Vanderbilt University
Samuel A. Bozzette
Samuel A. Bozzette University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine offers many rewarding career pathways beyond traditional medical school. If you’re considering a flexible, online route, a popular starting point is nursing. Numerous colleges now offer rn to bsn cheapest programs, helping registered nurses advance their education affordably—often while continuing to work.

For those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree who want to enter the nursing field quickly, online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors can provide a fast track to higher nursing credentials and new career opportunities.

If you’re concerned about admission requirements, consider researching the easiest rn program to get into. These institutions can help aspiring nurses start their journey, even with less competitive academic backgrounds.

If direct patient care isn’t your goal, allied health roles such as medical billing and coding are also in high demand. You can find accredited online medical coding classes with financial aid to quickly prepare for an administrative healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Albert W. Wu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles