World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 35 2114 1987 847 780 64 26801

Tatiana Kostova publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tatiana Kostova between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tatiana Kostova published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2019. 3 of the 69 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2019. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1995 2025

69 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tatiana Kostova: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 4
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 5
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 3
2008 1
2009 1
2010 1
2011 1
2012 1
2013 4
2014 2
2015 3
2016 5
2017 5
2018 4
2019 7
2020 5
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
2024 2
2025 1
Total 69
Download as CSV

Tatiana Kostova publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatiana Kostova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 60–64 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 64 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66 64
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Tatiana Kostova D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatiana Kostova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124 35
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Tatiana Kostova is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research contributions span across fields related to Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences. The primary subfields of study include Strategy and Management, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Communication.

Kostova's work extensively covers topics such as International Business and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Family Business Performance and Succession, Corporate Finance and Governance, Innovation and Knowledge Management, International Student and Expatriate Challenges, Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences, and Global Trade, Sustainability, and Social Impact.

Frequent publication venues for Kostova include the Journal of World Business, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Management Studies, Multinational Business Review, and Management and Organization Review.

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "Impact of informal institutions on the prevalence, strategy, and performance of family firms: A meta-analysis" (2020) published in the Journal of International Business Studies
  • "The impact of market based institutional reforms on firm strategy and performance: Review and extension" (2020) published in the Journal of World Business
  • "Integrating Diversity into Distance Research for Added Rigor, Parsimony, and Relevance" (2021) published in the Journal of Management Studies
  • "Multinational firms and sustainability in global supply chains: scope and boundaries of responsibility" (2024) published in the Journal of International Business Studies
  • "Three decades of research on practice transfer in multinational firms: Past contributions and future opportunities" (2023) published in the Journal of World Business

Collaborations have been a notable aspect of their work, with frequent co-authors including Marc van Essen, Luis Alfonso Dau, Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, Valentina Marano, and Jonathan P. Doh.

Best Publications

  • Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise

    Tatiana Kostova;Srilata Zaheer

  • Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects

    Tatiana Kostova;Kendall Roth

  • Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective

    Tatiana Kostova

  • Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations

    Jon L. Pierce;Tatiana Kostova;Kurt T. Dirks

  • The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research

    Jon L. Pierce;Tatiana Kostova;Kurt T. Dirks

  • Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions

    Tatiana Kostova;Kendall Roth;M. Tina Dacin

  • Social Capital in Multinational Corporations and a Micro-Macro Model of its Formation

    Tatiana Kostova;Kendall Roth

  • COUNTRY INSTITUTIONAL PROFILES: CONCEPT AND MEASUREMENT.

    Tatiana Kostova

  • Psychological Ownership: An Empirical Examination of its Consequences

    Don Vandewalle;Linn Van Dyne;Tatiana Kostova

  • Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting

    Linn Van Dyne;Don Vandewalle;Tatiana Kostova;Michael E. Latham

  • Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises

    Valentina Marano;Peter Tashman;Tatiana Kostova

  • An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006

    Sjoerd Beugelsdijk;Tatiana Kostova;Kendall Roth

  • Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals

    Peter Tashman;Valentina Marano;Tatiana Kostova

  • Cultural Distance and Firm Internationalization: A Meta-Analytical Review and Theoretical Implications

    Sjoerd Beugelsdijk;Tatiana Kostova;Vincent E. Kunst;Ettore Spadafora

  • Unpacking the Institutional Complexity in Adoption of CSR Practices in Multinational Enterprises

    Valentina Marano;Tatiana Kostova

  • Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects

    Unknown

  • Headquarters–subsidiary relationships in MNCs: Fifty years of evolving research

    Tatiana Kostova;Valentina Marano;Stephen Tallman

  • Organizational coping with institutional upheaval in transition economies

    Kendall Roth;Tatiana Kostova

  • A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise

    Davina Vora;Tatiana Kostova

  • The Use of the Multinational Corporation as a Research Context

    Kendall Roth;Tatiana Kostova

  • Utilizing the broader agency perspective for studying headquarters–subsidiary relations in multinational companies

    Anne Kristin Hoenen;Tatiana Kostova

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc van Essen
Marc van Essen University of South Carolina
Kendall Roth
Kendall Roth University of South Carolina
Sjoerd Beugelsdijk
Sjoerd Beugelsdijk University of South Carolina
Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens
Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Linn Van Dyne
Linn Van Dyne Michigan State University
Kurt T. Dirks
Kurt T. Dirks University of Utah
Luis R. Gomez-Mejia
Luis R. Gomez-Mejia Arizona State University
Mike W. Peng
Mike W. Peng The University of Texas at Dallas
Jon L. Pierce
Jon L. Pierce University of Minnesota
M. Tina Dacin
M. Tina Dacin Queen's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA opens doors to a variety of specialized online degrees and career options. Many students consider not only the program’s reputation but also the overall cost and the potential for flexible, remote learning.

If you're interested in the healthcare sector, pursuing a healthcare administration degree cost can be a key consideration. These programs are designed to prepare graduates for leadership roles within healthcare organizations, and affordability is crucial for many learners. For those seeking advanced roles, a healthcare administration masters may lead to higher earning potential and greater responsibility.

Business-minded students also often look at the cost of accounting degree when planning their education. An accounting degree can pave the way to careers in finance, auditing, and corporate management.

Finally, the rise of technology in business makes programs such as an artificial intelligence degree online highly relevant. These degrees prepare graduates to leverage AI in business, analytics, marketing, and operational efficiency.

Best Scientists Citing Tatiana Kostova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles