World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
54
Citations
8228
World Ranking
3667
National Ranking
1589

Vladimir Larionov publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vladimir Larionov sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 163 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Vladimir Larionov D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vladimir Larionov sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vladimir Larionov is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States and has contributed significantly to research in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans key areas including chromosomal and genetic variations, CRISPR and genetic engineering, genomics and chromatin dynamics, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, genomics and phylogenetic studies, as well as RNA modifications and cancer.

The scientist's main fields of study incorporate:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Larionov's research delves into several subfields, particularly focusing on molecular biology and plant science, supported by studies in genetics, biotechnology, and aspects of ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

Subfields of study include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Plant Science
  • Genetics
  • Biotechnology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Frequent co-authors in Larionov's publications highlight ongoing collaborations with researchers such as Natalay Kouprina, Mikhail Liskovykh, Hiroshi Masumoto, William C. Earnshaw, and Vladimir N. Noskov.

They have published extensively in venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Current Protocols
  • Journal of Cell Science
  • Oncotarget
  • Cells

Recent papers reflecting their research interests are:

  • The structure, function and evolution of a complete human chromosome 8 (2021, Nature)
  • The structure, function, and evolution of a complete human chromosome 8 (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • CENP-B creates alternative epigenetic chromatin states permissive for CENP-A or heterochromatin assembly (2020, Journal of Cell Science)
  • Selective isolation of large segments from individual microbial genomes and environmental DNA samples using transformation-associated recombination cloning in yeast (2020, Nature Protocols)
  • H3K9me3 maintenance on a human artificial chromosome is required for segregation but not centromere epigenetic memory (2020, Journal of Cell Science)

Best Publications

  • Epigenetic engineering shows H3K4me2 is required for HJURP targeting and CENP-A assembly on a synthetic human kinetochore.

    Jan H Bergmann;Mariluz Gómez Rodríguez;Nuno M C Martins;Hiroshi Kimura

  • CENP-B controls centromere formation depending on the chromatin context.

    Teruaki Okada;Jun-ichirou Ohzeki;Megumi Nakano;Kinya Yoda

  • Inactivation of a Human Kinetochore by Specific Targeting of Chromatin Modifiers

    Megumi Nakano;Stefano Cardinale;Vladimir N. Noskov;Reto Gassmann

  • The structure, function and evolution of a complete human chromosome 8

    Glennis A. Logsdon;Mitchell R. Vollger;Ping Hsun Hsieh;Yafei Mao

  • Accelerated Evolution of the ASPM Gene Controlling Brain Size Begins Prior to Human Brain Expansion

    Natalay Kouprina;Adam Pavlicek;Ganeshwaran H Mochida;Gregory Solomon

  • The microcephaly ASPM gene is expressed in proliferating tissues and encodes for a mitotic spindle protein

    Natalay Kouprina;Adam Pavlicek;N. Keith Collins;Megumi Nakano

  • Selective isolation of genomic loci from complex genomes by transformation-associated recombination cloning in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Natalay Kouprina;Vladimir Larionov

  • Specific cloning of human DNA as yeast artificial chromosomes by transformation-associated recombination

    Vladimir Larionov;Natalya Kouprina;Joan Graves;X. N. Chen

  • Breaking the HAC Barrier: histone H3K9 acetyl/methyl balance regulates CENP-A assembly.

    Jun-ichirou Ohzeki;Jan H Bergmann;Natalay Kouprina;Vladimir N Noskov

  • Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TAR cloning of genes and chromosomal loci from complex genomes in yeast

    Nicholas C.O. Lee;Vladimir Larionov;Natalay Kouprina

  • Differential cis-regulation of human versus mouse TERT gene expression in vivo: identification of a human-specific repressive element.

    Izumi Horikawa;Y. Jeffrey Chiang;Tricia Patterson;Lionel Feigenbaum

  • TAR cloning: insights into gene function, long-range haplotypes and genome structure and evolution

    Natalay Kouprina;Vladimir Larionov

  • Refined human artificial chromosome vectors for gene therapy and animal transgenesis.

    Y Kazuki;H Hoshiya;M Takiguchi;S Abe

  • Epigenetic engineering: histone H3K9 acetylation is compatible with kinetochore structure and function

    Jan H. Bergmann;Julia N. Jakubsche;Nuno M. Martins;Alexander Kagansky

  • 3D-CLEM Reveals that a Major Portion of Mitotic Chromosomes Is Not Chromatin.

    Daniel G. Booth;Alison J. Beckett;Oscar Molina;Itaru Samejima

  • Transformation-associated recombination (TAR) cloning for genomics studies and synthetic biology

    Natalay Kouprina;Vladimir Larionov

  • A minimal CENP-A core is required for nucleation and maintenance of a functional human centromere.

    Yasuhide Okamoto;Megumi Nakano;Jun-ichirou Ohzeki;Vladimir Larionov

  • The human telomerase gene: complete genomic sequence and analysis of tandem repeat polymorphisms in intronic regions.

    Sun-Hee Leem;J Arturo Londoño-Vallejo;Jung-Hyun Kim;Hung Bui

  • Evolution of the tumor suppressor BRCA1 locus in primates: implications for cancer predisposition

    Adam Pavlicek;Vladimir N. Noskov;Natalay Kouprina;J. Carl Barrett

  • The structure, function, and evolution of a complete human chromosome 8

    Glennis A. Logsdon;Mitchell R. Vollger;PingHsun Hsieh;Yafei Mao

Frequent Co-Authors

William C. Earnshaw
William C. Earnshaw University of Edinburgh
Hiroshi Masumoto
Hiroshi Masumoto Kazusa DNA Research Institute
J. Carl Barrett
J. Carl Barrett AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Hiroshi Kimura
Hiroshi Kimura Tokyo Institute of Technology
Michael A. Resnick
Michael A. Resnick National Institutes of Health
Mitsuo Oshimura
Mitsuo Oshimura Tottori University
Yves Pommier
Yves Pommier National Institutes of Health
William C. Reinhold
William C. Reinhold National Institutes of Health
David Schlessinger
David Schlessinger National Institutes of Health
Jerzy Jurka
Jerzy Jurka Genetic Information Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in Genetics opens the door to diverse healthcare and research professions. Many students explore related fields or look for flexible online programs to broaden their skills. For nurses aiming to further their education, online rn to bsn programs allow registered nurses to advance their credentials without the need for traditional clinical hours, providing a convenient path to career growth.

In advanced practice, earning a doctoral degree can be streamlined. Students interested in leadership or research roles in healthcare can consider the quickest dnp program options available online to accelerate their professional journey. For those seeking entry-level roles in the health sector, a medical.assistant program enables fast-track training—sometimes in as little as six weeks.

Even among rigorous doctoral paths, there are now dnp program alternatives designed for accessibility and efficiency. Exploring these flexible degree options can empower Genetics students to expand their expertise, adapt to evolving healthcare needs, and open new professional pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Vladimir Larionov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles