World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
4943
World Ranking
8444
National Ranking
105

Stein Haaland publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stein Haaland sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 262 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stein Haaland D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stein Haaland sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stein Haaland is affiliated with the University of Bergen in Norway and has contributed extensively to the fields of physics and astronomy, with a strong emphasis on space plasma dynamics and ionospheric processes. Their body of work is situated mainly within astronomy and astrophysics, with contributions also intersecting molecular biology, nuclear and high energy physics, atmospheric science, and surgery.

The research work of Stein Haaland often focuses on the interplay between the ionosphere and magnetosphere, solar and space plasma dynamics, and geomagnetism. Key areas of study include:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis

Stein Haaland's frequent co-authors reflect collaborations across several researchers in related fields:

  • Jone Peter Reistad
  • G. Paschmann
  • K. M. Laundal
  • Anders Ohma
  • B. Lavraud

Their publications commonly appear in specialized journals focusing on space physics and astronomy, including:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • Annales Geophysicae

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Stein Haaland are the following:

  • "Impacts of Ionospheric Ions on Magnetic Reconnection and Earth's Magnetosphere Dynamics," 2021, Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Cluster and MMS Simultaneous Observations of Magnetosheath High Speed Jets and Their Impact on the Magnetopause," 2020, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • "Particle energization in space plasmas: towards a multi-point, multi-scale plasma observatory," 2021, Experimental Astronomy
  • "Characteristics of the Flank Magnetopause: MMS Results," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • "Curlometer Technique and Applications," 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Best Publications

  • Auroral Plasma Physics

    Götz Paschmann;Stein Haaland;Rudolf A Treumann

  • Four-spacecraft determination of magnetopause orientation, motion and thickness: comparison with results from single-spacecraft methods

    S. E. Haaland;B. U. Ö. Sonnerup;M. W. Dunlop;A. Balogh

  • High-latitude plasma convection from Cluster EDI measurements: method and IMF-dependence

    S. E. Haaland;G. Paschmann;M. Förster;J. M. Quinn;J. M. Quinn

  • Transient and localized processes in the magnetotail: a review

    A. S. Sharma;R. Nakamura;A. Runov;A. Runov;E. E. Grigorenko

  • Reconstruction of two-dimensional magnetopause structures from Cluster observations: verification of method

    H. Hasegawa;B. U. Ö. Sonnerup;M. W. Dunlop;A. Balogh

  • North–South Asymmetries in Earth’s Magnetic Field

    Karl Magnus Laundal;Ingrid Cnossen;Stephen Eric Milan;Stephen Eric Milan;Stein Haaland;Stein Haaland

  • Dawn–dusk asymmetries in the coupled solar wind–magnetosphere–ionosphere system: a review

    Andrew P. Walsh;Stein Haaland;Colin Forsyth;Amy M. Keesee

  • How the IMF B-y induces a B-y component in the closed magnetosphere and how it leads to asymmetric currents and convection patterns in the two hemispheres

    Paul Tenfjord;Nikolai Østgaard;Kristian Snekvik;Karl Magnus Laundal

  • IMF dependence of high-latitude thermospheric wind pattern derived from CHAMP cross-track measurements

    M. Förster;S. Rentz;W. Köhler;H. Liu

  • Magnetopause and Boundary Layer

    J. De Keyser;M. W. Dunlop;C. J. Owen;B. U. Ö. Sonnerup

  • What is the best method to calculate the solar wind propagation delay

    B. Mailyan;C. Munteanu;S. Haaland

  • Interhemispheric differences in ionospheric convection: Cluster EDI observations revisited

    M. Förster;S. Haaland;S. Haaland

  • Turbulence Heating ObserveR – satellite mission proposal

    A. Vaivads;A. Retinò;J. Soucek;Yu.V. Khotyaintsev

  • High-latitude plasma convection from Cluster EDI: variances and solar wind correlations

    M. Förster;G. Paschmann;S. E. Haaland;S. E. Haaland;J. M. Quinn

  • Solar cycle variations of the Cluster spacecraft potential and its use for electron density estimations

    B. Lybekk;A. Pedersen;S. Haaland;K. Svenes

  • Outflow of low-energy ions and the solar cycle

    Mats André;K. Li;K. Li;Anders I. Eriksson

  • How the IMF $\mathit{B}_{y}$ induces a $\mathit{B}_{y}$ component in the closed magnetosphere and how it leads to asymmetric currents and convection patterns in the two hemispheres

    P. Tenfjord;N. Østgaard;K. Snekvik;K.M. Laundal

  • Characteristics of the near-tail dawn magnetopause and boundary layer

    G. Paschmann;S. Haaland;B. U. Ö. Sonnerup;H. Hasegawa

  • Orientation and motion of a plasma discontinuity from single‐spacecraft measurements: Generic residue analysis of Cluster data

    B. U. Ö. Sonnerup;S. Haaland;G. Paschmann;M. W. Dunlop

  • North-South Asymmetries in Earth's Magnetic Field: Effects on High-Latitude Geospace

    K.M. Laundal;I. Cnossen;S.E. Milan;S.E. Haaland

  • Dawn-dusk asymmetries in the coupled Solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere system

    A. P. Walsh;S. Haaland;C. Forsyth;A. M. Keesee

Frequent Co-Authors

Nikolai Østgaard
Nikolai Østgaard University of Bergen
Kjellmar Oksavik
Kjellmar Oksavik University of Bergen
G. Paschmann
G. Paschmann Max Planck Society
Mats André
Mats André Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Iannis Dandouras
Iannis Dandouras British Antarctic Survey
Steve E. Milan
Steve E. Milan University of Leicester
Jesper Gjerloev
Jesper Gjerloev Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
L. M. Kistler
L. M. Kistler University of New Hampshire
James L. Burch
James L. Burch Southwest Research Institute
Benoit Lavraud
Benoit Lavraud Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in enhancing their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees offers valuable opportunities. Many professionals pursue advanced education such as an edd no dissertation to gain leadership skills without the burden of extensive research projects.

Transitioning from a Master of Education to a Doctor of Education can be seamless with programs recognized among the best eds to edd programs. These pathways can prepare environmental educators or policymakers to effect change at higher levels.

Social work is another field connected to environmental justice and community well-being. Pursuing the cheapest dsw program online allows students to engage in doctoral studies with minimal financial barriers while contributing to social impact efforts.

For learners seeking flexibility and broad knowledge bases, enrolling in an affordable online general studies degree program provides customizable curricula that can complement careers in environmental science, policy, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Stein Haaland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles