World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
5952
World Ranking
9404
National Ranking
3371

Jesper Gjerloev publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesper Gjerloev sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 207 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jesper Gjerloev D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesper Gjerloev sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jesper Gjerloev is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily centers on physics and astronomy, earth and planetary sciences, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broader fields, their work extensively covers subfields such as astronomy and astrophysics, molecular biology, geophysics, electrical and electronic engineering, and atomic and molecular physics, and optics.

The scientist has focused on topics including ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, geomagnetism and paleomagnetism studies, solar and space plasma dynamics, earthquake detection and analysis, astro and planetary science, atomic and subatomic physics research, and complex systems and time series analysis.

Jesper Gjerloev has published frequently in several venues, notably:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Space Weather
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences

Among recent papers associated with Gjerloev's research are:

  • Is the Substorm Current Wedge an Ensemble of Wedgelets?: Revisit to Midlatitude Positive Bays, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • A global climatological model of extreme geomagnetic field fluctuations, 2020, Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
  • Distribution and Occurrence Frequency of dB/dt Spikes During Magnetic Storms 1980-2020, 2022, Space Weather
  • AE, DST, and Their SuperMAG Counterparts: The Effect of Improved Spatial Resolution in Geomagnetic Indices, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Solar Cycle and Solar Wind Dependence of the Occurrence of Large dB/dt Events at High Latitudes, 2023, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

The scientist collaborates regularly with several researchers, including:

  • S. Ohtani
  • S. E. Milan
  • S. K. Vines
  • M. Friel
  • Audrey Schillings

Best Publications

  • The SuperMAG data processing technique

    J. W. Gjerloev;J. W. Gjerloev

  • Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power

    P. T. Newell;J. W. Gjerloev

  • Geotail observations of magnetic flux ropes in the plasma sheet

    J. A. Slavin;R. P. Lepping;J. Gjerloev;D. H. Fairfield

  • Field‐aligned currents' scale analysis performed with the Swarm constellation

    Hermann Lühr;Jaeheung Park;Jesper W. Gjerloev;Jesper W. Gjerloev;Jan Rauberg

  • Substorm and magnetosphere characteristic scales inferred from the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices

    P. T. Newell;J. W. Gjerloev

  • A Global Ground‐Based Magnetometer Initiative

    J. W. Gjerloev

  • SuperMAG‐based partial ring current indices

    P. T. Newell;J. W. Gjerloev

  • A new technique for determining Substorm Onsets and Phases from Indices of the Electrojet (SOPHIE)

    C. Forsyth;I. J. Rae;J. C. Coxon;M. P. Freeman

  • Extremely intense (SML l–2500 nT) substorms: isolated events that are externally triggered?

    B. T. Tsurutani;R. Hajra;E. Echer;J. W. Gjerloev;J. W. Gjerloev

  • First observations of the temporal/spatial variation of the sub‐auroral polarization stream from the SuperDARN Wallops HF radar

    Kjellmar Oksavik;R. A. Greenwald;J. M. Ruohoniemi;M. R. Hairston

  • Cluster electric current density measurements within a magnetic flux rope in the plasma sheet

    J. A. Slavin;R. P. Lepping;J. Gjerloev;M. L. Goldstein

  • Characteristics of the terrestrial field-aligned current system

    J. W. Gjerloev;J. W. Gjerloev;S. Ohtani;T. Iijima;B. Anderson

  • Observations of ionospheric convection from the Wallops SuperDARN radar at middle latitudes

    J. B. H. Baker;R. A. Greenwald;J. M. Ruohoniemi;K. Oksavik

  • Is the Substorm Current Wedge an Ensemble of Wedgelets?: Revisit to Midlatitude Positive Bays

    Shinichi Ohtani;Jesper W. Gjerloev;Jesper W. Gjerloev

  • A relation between the energy deposition by electron precipitation and geomagnetic indices during substorms

    N. Østgaard;N. Østgaard;R. R. Vondrak;J. W. Gjerloev

  • Magnetospheric current systems during stormtime sawtooth events

    T. I. Pulkkinen;T. I. Pulkkinen;N. Y. Ganushkina;E. I. Tanskanen;M. Kubyshkina

  • Geomagnetically Induced Currents Caused by Interplanetary Shocks With Different Impact Angles and Speeds

    D. M. Oliveira;D. M. Oliveira;D. Arel;J. Raeder;E. Zesta

  • Supersubstorms (SML < −2500 nT): Magnetic storm and solar cycle dependences

    Rajkumar Hajra;Rajkumar Hajra;Bruce T. Tsurutani;Ezequiel Echer;Walter D. Gonzalez

  • The large‐scale current system during auroral substorms

    J. W. Gjerloev;J. W. Gjerloev;R. A. Hoffman

  • Height-integrated conductivity in auroral substorms. 1. Data

    J. W. Gjerloev;R. A. Hoffman

  • A global climatological model of extreme geomagnetic field fluctuations

    Neil C. Rogers;James A. Wild;Emma F. Eastoe;Jesper W. Gjerloev

  • Currents in auroral substorms

    J. W. Gjerloev;R. A. Hoffman

Frequent Co-Authors

Shinichi Ohtani
Shinichi Ohtani Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Brian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Stein Haaland
Stein Haaland University of Bergen
Mervyn P. Freeman
Mervyn P. Freeman British Antarctic Survey
Ian R. Mann
Ian R. Mann University of Alberta
James A. Slavin
James A. Slavin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. M. Ruohoniemi
J. M. Ruohoniemi Virginia Tech
R. A. Hoffman
R. A. Hoffman Goddard Space Flight Center
Bruce T. Tsurutani
Bruce T. Tsurutani California Institute of Technology
Nikolai Østgaard
Nikolai Østgaard University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, a variety of related online degrees can enhance career prospects. Educators aiming for leadership roles may explore accredited eds to edd programs, which provide advanced training in education administration and policy.

Social work professionals passionate about community and environmental health might consider pursuing online dsw programs. These programs offer affordable pathways to doctoral degrees focused on social interventions and advocacy.

For students seeking flexible and affordable options, earning an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can be a practical choice. Such degrees allow for interdisciplinary study, which can complement an environmental sciences background.

Additionally, those looking for a more straightforward academic route may find value in exploring what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get. Understanding these options can help streamline degree attainment while maintaining career relevance.

Best Scientists Citing Jesper Gjerloev

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles