World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
64
Citations
13138
World Ranking
1516
National Ranking
156

Steve E. Milan publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve E. Milan sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 403 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Steve E. Milan D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve E. Milan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve E. Milan is affiliated with the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines within physics and astronomy, with a focus on space and atmospheric phenomena. They have contributed extensively to the understanding of ionospheric and magnetospheric dynamics.

The main fields of study for Steve E. Milan include Physics and Astronomy and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work emphasizes cross-disciplinary approaches, particularly within the subfields of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, and Aerospace Engineering.

The predominant topics addressed by their research include:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Solar and space plasma dynamics
  • Geomagnetism and paleomagnetism studies
  • Astro and planetary science
  • Earthquake detection and analysis
  • Atmospheric ozone and climate
  • Planetary science and exploration

In terms of publication venues, Steve E. Milan has published most frequently in the following journals:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics (37 publications)
  • Space Science Reviews (2 publications)
  • Earth and Planetary Physics (1 publication)
  • Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate (1 publication)
  • Radio Science (1 publication)

Some notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Steve E. Milan include:

  • "Dual-Lobe Reconnection and Horse-Collar Auroras," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • "Solar Cycle and Solar Wind Dependence of the Occurrence of Large dB/dt Events at High Latitudes," 2023, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • "Aurora in the Polar Cap: A Review," 2020, Space Science Reviews
  • "Do Statistical Models Capture the Dynamics of the Magnetopause During Sudden Magnetospheric Compressions?," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Paper by E. J. Bunce, 2020, Aberystwyth Research portal (Aberystwyth University)

Steve E. Milan collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Gemma Bower
  • L. J. Paxton
  • B. J. Anderson
  • Jennifer Carter
  • S. M. Imber

Their research contributions reflect a strong presence in the study of space environments and their interactions with the Earth's magnetic and atmospheric systems. This work supports advancing knowledge in both observational and theoretical aspects of geophysics and space science.

Best Publications

  • A decade of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN): scientific achievements, new techniques and future directions

    G. Chisham;M. Lester;Steve E. Milan;M.P. Freeman

  • Magnetic flux transport in the Dungey cycle: A survey of dayside and nightside reconnection rates

    S. E. Milan;G. Provan;Benoît Hubert

  • Variations in the polar cap area during two substorm cycles

    Steve E. Milan;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;K. Oksavik

  • Review of the accomplishments of mid-latitude Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) HF radars

    Nozomu Nishitani;John Michael Ruohoniemi;Mark Lester;Joseph Benjamin Harold Baker

  • Initial backscatter occurrence statistics from the CUTLASS HF radars

    S. E. Milan;T. K. Yeoman;M. Lester;E. C. Thomas

  • Convection and auroral response to a southward turning of the IMF : Polar UVI, CUTLASS, and IMAGE signatures of transient magnetic flux transfer at the magnetopause

    S. E. Milan;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;M. Brittnacher

  • Relationship between interplanetary parameters and the magnetopause reconnection rate quantified from observations of the expanding polar cap

    S. E. Milan;J. S. Gosling;B. Hubert

  • Overview of Solar Wind–Magnetosphere–Ionosphere–Atmosphere Coupling and the Generation of Magnetospheric Currents

    Stephen Eric Milan;Stephen Eric Milan;Lasse Boy Novock Clausen;John Charles Coxon;Jenny A. Carter

  • Reconnection in a rotation-dominated magnetosphere and its relation to Saturn's auroral dynamics

    S. W. H. Cowley;Sarah V. Badman;E. J. Bunce;J. T. Clarke

  • Interplanetary coronal mass ejection observed at STEREO-A, Mars, comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, Saturn, and New Horizons en route to Pluto: Comparison of its Forbush decreases at 1.4, 3.1, and 9.9 AU

    Olivier Witasse;Beatriz Sánchez-Cano;M. L. Mays;P. Kajdič

  • Meridian-scanning photometer, coherent HF radar, and magnetometer observations of the cusp: a case study

    S. E. Milan;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;J. Moen

  • Dayside convection and auroral morphology during an interval of northward interplanetary magnetic field

    S. E. Milan;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;M. Brittnacher

  • Influences on the radius of the auroral oval

    Stephen E. Milan;J. Hutchinson;P. D. Boakes;P. D. Boakes;B. Hubert

  • Interplanetary magnetic field at ∼9 AU during the declining phase of the solar cycle and its implications for Saturn's magnetospheric dynamics

    C. M. Jackman;N. Achilleos;E. J. Bunce;S. W. H. Cowley

  • Formation and motion of a transpolar arc in response to dayside and nightside reconnection

    Steve E. Milan;B. Hubert;B. Hubert;Adrian Grocott

  • Dynamics of the region 1 Birkeland current oval derived from the active magnetosphere and planetary electrodynamics response experiment (AMPERE)

    L. B. N. Clausen;J. B. H. Baker;J. M. Ruohoniemi;S. E. Milan

  • CUTLASS Finland radar observations of the ionospheric signatures of flux transfer events and the resulting plasma flows

    G. Provan;Tim K Yeoman;Stephen E. Milan

  • First simultaneous observations of flux transfer events at the high-latitude magnetopause by the Cluster spacecraft and pulsed radar signatures in the conjugate ionosphere by the CUTLASS and EISCAT radars

    J. A. Wild;Stanley William Herbert Cowley;J. A. Davies;H. Khan

  • Stereo CUTLASS - A new capability for the SuperDARN HF radars

    M. Lester;P. J. Chapman;S. W. H. Cowley;S. J. Crooks

  • Interferometric evidence for the observation of ground backscatter originating behind the CUTLASS coherent HF radars

    S. E. Milan;T. B. Jones;T. R. Robinson;E. C. Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Lester
Mark Lester University of Leicester
Tim K. Yeoman
Tim K. Yeoman University of Leicester
Stanley W. H. Cowley
Stanley W. H. Cowley University of Leicester
Adrian Grocott
Adrian Grocott Lancaster University
Nikolai Østgaard
Nikolai Østgaard University of Bergen
Stein Haaland
Stein Haaland University of Bergen
Christopher J. Owen
Christopher J. Owen University College London
Harald U. Frey
Harald U. Frey University of California, Berkeley
Andrew Fazakerley
Andrew Fazakerley University College London
Mike Lockwood
Mike Lockwood University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens diverse educational and professional avenues, often intersecting with other fields. For those looking to broaden their expertise, pursuing a best online human resource management masters degree can complement scientific knowledge with valuable leadership and organizational skills.

Many learners, including seniors, seek flexible and accelerated programs. Options such as one year degrees for seniors provide accessible pathways to update qualifications or shift careers efficiently without compromising quality.

Additionally, information management plays a key role in Earth Science, especially in data-heavy research environments. Programs like mlis ala accredited programs offer specialized training in information science, equipping graduates to manage scientific data and resources effectively.

Considering a is a library science degree worth it? For Earth Science professionals, it can enhance skills in data curation and archival work, adding long-term value to both academic and applied research careers.

Best Scientists Citing Steve E. Milan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles