World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
12773
World Ranking
2934
National Ranking
232

Christopher J. Owen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher J. Owen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 371 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Christopher J. Owen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher J. Owen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher J. Owen is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans primarily the field of Physics and Astronomy, with a significant focus on Astronomy and Astrophysics as a subfield.

Their contributions are distributed across a variety of specific topics including:

  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
  • Planetary Science and Exploration

Christopher J. Owen has published extensively, with recent papers featured in notable journals. Selected recent publications include:

  • The Solar Orbiter mission, 2020, Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Emergence of genomic diversity and recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2, 2020, Infection Genetics and Evolution
  • The Solar Orbiter Solar Wind Analyser (SWA) suite, 2020, Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • The Solar Orbiter magnetometer, 2020, Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • The Solar Orbiter Radio and Plasma Waves (RPW) instrument, 2020, Astronomy and Astrophysics

The venues in which they most frequently publish include:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)

Repeated collaboration characterizes much of their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • T. S. Horbury
  • P. Louarn
  • Daniel Verscharen
  • Georgios Nicolaou
  • M. Maksimović

Best Publications

  • The Solar Orbiter mission. Science overview

    D. Müller;O. C. St. Cyr;I. Zouganelis;H. R. Gilbert

  • Emergence of genomic diversity and recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2.

    Lucy van Dorp;Mislav Acman;Damien Richard;Liam P. Shaw

  • In situ evidence of magnetic reconnection in turbulent plasma

    Alessandro Retinò;Alessandro Retinò;David Sundkvist;Andris Vaivads;F. Mozer

  • Geotail observations of magnetic flux ropes in the plasma sheet

    J. A. Slavin;R. P. Lepping;J. Gjerloev;D. H. Fairfield

  • The Solar Orbiter Solar Wind Analyser (SWA) suite

    C. J. Owen;R. Bruno;S. Livi;P. Louarn

  • Plasma Jet Braking : Energy Dissipation and Nonadiabatic Electrons

    Yuri Khotyaintsev;Christopher Cully;Andris Vaivads;Mats André

  • Comprehensive study of the magnetospheric response to a hot flow anomaly

    D. G. Sibeck;N. L. Borodkova;S. J. Schwartz;C. J. Owen

  • Observations of the lunar plasma wake from the WIND spacecraft on December 27, 1994

    K. W. Ogilvie;J. T. Steinberg;R. J. Fitzenreiter;C. J. Owen

  • The Solar Orbiter magnetometer

    T. S. Horbury;H. O’Brien;I. Carrasco Blazquez;M. Bendyk

  • A SIMPLE ILLUSTRATIVE MODEL OF OPEN FLUX TUBE MOTION OVER THE DAYSIDE MAGNETOPAUSE

    S.W.H. Cowley;C.J. Owen

  • Role of the magnetosheath flow in determining the motion of open flux tubes

    B. M. A. Cooling;C. J. Owen;S. J. Schwartz

  • Dynamics of thin current sheets associated with magnetotail reconnection

    R. Nakamura;W. Baumjohann;Y. Asano;Y. Asano;A. Runov

  • The Energetic Particle Detector - Energetic particle instrument suite for the Solar Orbiter mission

    J. Rodríguez-Pacheco;R. F. Wimmer-Schweingruber;G. M. Mason;G. C. Ho

  • Evolution of Kelvin‐Helmholtz activity on the dusk flank magnetopause

    Claire Foullon;Charles J. Farrugia;Andrew Fazakerley;Christopher J. Owen

  • Temporal evolution of the electric field accelerating electrons away from the auroral ionosphere

    Göran T. Marklund;Nickolay V. Ivchenko;Tomas Karlsson;A. Fazakerley

  • The structure of flux transfer events recovered from Cluster data

    H. Hasegawa;B. U. Ö. Sonnerup;C. J. Owen;B. Klecker

  • Three spacecraft observations of solar wind discontinuities

    Timothy S. Horbury;David Burgess;Markus Fränz;Christopher J. Owen

  • Transient and localized processes in the magnetotail: a review

    A. S. Sharma;R. Nakamura;A. Runov;A. Runov;E. E. Grigorenko

  • Meridian-scanning photometer, coherent HF radar, and magnetometer observations of the cusp: a case study

    S. E. Milan;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;J. Moen

  • Dynamics of thin current sheets: Cluster observations

    W. Baumjohann;A. Roux;O. Le Contel;R. Nakamura

  • Observations of Slow Electron Holes at a Magnetic Reconnection Site

    Yuri V. Khotyaintsev;Andris Vaivads;Mats André;M. Fujimoto

  • Cluster observations of an ion-scale current sheet in the magnetotail under the presence of a guide field

    R. Nakamura;W. Baumjohann;M. Fujimoto;Y. Asano

  • The Solar Orbiter Radio and Plasma Waves (RPW) instrument

    M. Maksimovic;S. D. Bale;T. Chust;Y. Khotyaintsev

  • EL CVn-type binaries - Discovery of 17 helium white dwarf precursors in bright eclipsing binary star systems

    P. F. L. Maxted;S. Bloemen;U. Heber;S. Geier

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Fazakerley
Andrew Fazakerley University College London
H. Rème
H. Rème Paul Sabatier University
E. A. Lucek
E. A. Lucek Imperial College London
Rumi Nakamura
Rumi Nakamura Austrian Academy of Sciences
James A. Slavin
James A. Slavin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Iannis Dandouras
Iannis Dandouras British Antarctic Survey
Malcolm Dunlop
Malcolm Dunlop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
André Balogh
André Balogh Imperial College London
Wolfgang Baumjohann
Wolfgang Baumjohann Austrian Academy of Sciences
J. A. Sauvaud
J. A. Sauvaud Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education alongside a career in Environmental Sciences, exploring flexible online options can be a great choice. Many professionals find that pursuing doctoral programs online no dissertation offers a practical path to earn advanced degrees without the added pressure of lengthy dissertations.

If you’re considering further specialization in education or leadership within the environmental field, transitioning through eds to edd programs online can help bridge the gap between a master's and a doctorate, all through accessible online platforms.

Those passionate about social impact in environmental policy or community work might explore affordable qualifications. Programs like the cheapest dsw program provide cost-effective routes to doctorate degrees that complement environmental expertise.

Additionally, broadening foundational knowledge through a budget friendly online general studies degree can enhance interdisciplinary skills, improving eligibility for diverse career pathways in environmental science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher J. Owen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles