World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Adrian Grocott publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Grocott sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Adrian Grocott D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Grocott sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adrian Grocott is affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom, contributing to multiple fields within Physics and Astronomy as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research spans a diverse range of subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Oceanography, Geophysics, and Aerospace Engineering.

The primary focus of Grocott's work lies in ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, solar and space plasma dynamics, and geomagnetism and paleomagnetism studies. Additional research topics include geophysics and gravity measurements, earthquake detection and analysis, GNSS positioning and interference, and methane hydrates and related phenomena.

Frequent publication venues for Grocott include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Space Weather
  • Annales Geophysicae
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Geophysical Monograph

Notable recent papers authored by Adrian Grocott include:

  • Multi-Instrument Observations of Ion-Neutral Coupling in the Dayside Cusp (2020, Geophysical Research Letters)
  • Average Ionospheric Electric Field Morphologies During Geomagnetic Storm Phases (2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics)
  • Super Dual Auroral Radar Network Expansion and Its Influence on the Derived Ionospheric Convection Pattern (2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics)
  • A Quantitative Comparison of High Latitude Electric Field Models During a Large Geomagnetic Storm (2022, Space Weather)
  • North-South Asymmetric Nightside Distorted Transpolar Arcs Within A Framework of Deformed Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling: IMF- B y Dependence, Ionospheric Currents, and Magnetotail Reconnection (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics)

Collaborations have been frequent with other researchers including:

  • Maria-Theresia Walach
  • Nathan Case
  • S. E. Milan
  • E. G. Thomas
  • James Lane

Grocott's publications reflect a strong engagement with the dynamics of the Earth's upper atmosphere and space environment, focusing particularly on the ionosphere and magnetosphere and their interactions with geomagnetic phenomena. This work contributes to understanding space weather effects, electric field morphologies, and magnetospheric coupling processes.

Best Publications

  • A decade of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN): scientific achievements, new techniques and future directions

    G. Chisham;M. Lester;Steve E. Milan;M.P. Freeman

  • Formation and motion of a transpolar arc in response to dayside and nightside reconnection

    Steve E. Milan;B. Hubert;B. Hubert;Adrian Grocott

  • Dayside and nightside reconnection rates inferred from IMAGE FUV and Super Dual Auroral Radar Network data

    Benoît Hubert;S. E. Milan;A. Grocott;Caroline Blockx

  • A superposed epoch analysis of auroral evolution during substorm growth, onset and recovery: open magnetic flux control of substorm intensity

    Steve E. Milan;Adrian Grocott;Colin Forsyth;Colin Forsyth;S.M. Imber;S.M. Imber

  • Ionospheric flow during extended intervals of northward but B y -dominated IMF

    Adrian Grocott;S.W.H. Cowley;J.B. Sigwarth

  • Superposed epoch analysis of the ionospheric convection evolution during substorms : onset latitude dependence

    Adrian Grocott;J.A. Wild;Steve E. Milan;Tim K. Yeoman

  • Excitation of twin-vortex flow in the nightside high-latitude ionosphere during an isolated substorm

    Adrian Grocott;Swh W. H. Cowley;Jb B. Sigwarth;Jf F. Watermann

  • Interhemispheric observations of the ionospheric signature of tail reconnection during IMF-northward non-substorm intervals

    Adrian Grocott;Tim K. Yeoman;Steve E. Milan;S. W. H. Cowley

  • Localized fast flow disturbance observed in the plasma sheet and in the ionosphere

    R. Nakamura;O. Amm;H. Laakso;N.C. Draper

  • The influence of IMF By on the nature of the nightside high-latitude ionospheric flow during intervals of positive IMF Bz

    Adrian Grocott;S. V. Badman;S. W. H. Cowley;Tim K. Yeoman

  • Multi-instrument observations of the ionospheric counterpart of a bursty bulk flow in the near-Earth plasma sheet

    Adrian Grocott;Tim K. Yeoman;R. Nakamura;S. W. H. Cowley

  • Cluster and Double Star multipoint observations of a plasma bubble

    A. P. Walsh;A. N. Fazakerley;A. D. Lahiff;M. Volwerk

  • Dynamic auroral storms on Saturn as observed by the Hubble Space Telescope.

    J. D. Nichols;S. V. Badman;K. H. Baines;R. H. Brown

  • Magnetosonic Mach number dependence of the efficiency of reconnection between planetary and interplanetary magnetic fields

    Adrian Grocott;S. V. Badman;S. W. H. Cowley;Steve E. Milan

  • SuperDARN Observations During Geomagnetic Storms, Geomagnetically Active Times, and Enhanced Solar Wind Driving

    Maria Walach;Adrian Grocott

  • Characteristics of medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances observed near the Antarctic Peninsula by HF radar

    A. Grocott;K. Hosokawa;T. Ishida;M. Lester

  • The influence of IMF clock angle timescales on the morphology of ionospheric convection

    A. Grocott;Stephen Eric Milan

  • Multi-scale observations of magnetotail flux transport during IMF-northward non-substorm intervals

    Adrian Grocott;Tim K. Yeoman;Steve E. Milan;O. Amm

  • Superposed epoch analysis of the ionospheric convection evolution during substorms:IMF BY dependence

    A. Grocott;S. E. Milan;T. K. Yeoman;N. Sato

  • Observed tail current systems associated with bursty bulk flows and auroral streamers during a period of multiple substorms

    Colin Forsyth;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;I. Dandouras

  • Timescales for the penetration of IMF By into the Earth's magnetotail

    Stephen Browett;R.C. Fear;Adrian Grocott;S. E. Milan;S. E. Milan

  • Interplanetary magnetic field control of fast azimuthal flows in the nightside high-latitude ionosphere

    Adrian Grocott;Steve E. Milan;Tim K. Yeoman

  • A superposed epoch analysis of auroral evolution during substorm growth, onset, and recovery

    S. E. Milan;A. Grocott;C. Forsyth;S. M. Imber

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve E. Milan
Steve E. Milan University of Leicester
Mark Lester
Mark Lester University of Leicester
Stanley W. H. Cowley
Stanley W. H. Cowley University of Leicester
Tim K. Yeoman
Tim K. Yeoman University of Leicester
Stein Haaland
Stein Haaland University of Bergen
Kjellmar Oksavik
Kjellmar Oksavik University of Bergen
Andrew Fazakerley
Andrew Fazakerley University College London
Martin Volwerk
Martin Volwerk Austrian Academy of Sciences
Harald U. Frey
Harald U. Frey University of California, Berkeley
Rumi Nakamura
Rumi Nakamura Austrian Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths, but many students also explore complementary fields to broaden their expertise. For those interested in organizational leadership and team management within scientific institutions, programs like the best online master degree in human resource management offer valuable skills that enhance workplace efficiency.

Additionally, non-traditional students and seniors often seek flexible options. One-year degrees can be particularly appealing, delivering targeted knowledge without a lengthy time commitment. Resources such as the one year degrees for seniors highlight programs designed with this demographic in mind, making continuing education accessible and practical.

For Earth Science graduates interested in managing extensive scientific data and research archives, pursuing a online mlis degree ala accredited can be a strategic choice. This qualification supports careers in information management, vital for preserving environmental research and resources.

Similarly, a degree in library science complements Earth Science by developing expertise in organizing, accessing, and disseminating scientific knowledge, which is essential in academic and governmental research settings.

Best Scientists Citing Adrian Grocott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles