World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
67
Citations
16444
World Ranking
8201
National Ranking
3706

Dolores R. Piperno publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dolores R. Piperno sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 126 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Dolores R. Piperno D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dolores R. Piperno sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2005 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2003 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Dolores R. Piperno is affiliated with the National Museum of Natural History in the United States. Their research focuses on various scientific fields, with a primary emphasis on Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Arts and Humanities. Subfields covered include History, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, and General Health Professions.

Their main research topics include:

  • Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Cassava research and cyanide
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Plant Diversity and Evolution
  • Indigenous Health and Education
  • Mining and Resource Management
  • Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies

The scientist has contributed to several recent papers which encompass a range of subjects primarily related to vegetation, phytoliths, and environmental history. Notable publications include:

  • "Tropical forests as key sites of the "Anthropocene": Past and present perspectives" (2021) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Phytoliths in modern plants from amazonia and the neotropics at large: Implications for vegetation history reconstruction" (2020) published in Quaternary International
  • "A 5,000-year vegetation and fire history for tierra firme forests in the Medio Putumayo-Algodón watersheds, northeastern Peru" (2021) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

They have also been involved in coauthored research with colleagues such as Crystal N. H. McMichael, William D. Gosling, Marcos Ríos Paredes, Britte M. Heijink, and Nina H. Witteveen.

Frequent publication venues where their research appears include:

  • Quaternary International
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
  • Biotropica
  • Plants People Planet

Recognition for the scientist's work includes several awards and distinctions such as:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2005)
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (2005)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2003)

Best Publications

  • Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies

    Greger Larson;Dolores R. Piperno;Robin G. Allaby;Michael D. Purugganan

  • Starch grain and phytolith evidence for early ninth millennium B.P. maize from the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico

    Dolores R. Piperno;Anthony J. Ranere;Irene Holst;Jose Iriarte

  • Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium)

    Amanda G. Henry;Alison S. Brooks;Dolores R. Piperno

  • The earliest archaeological maize (Zea mays L.) from highland Mexico: New accelerator mass spectrometry dates and their implications

    Dolores R. Piperno;Kent V. Flannery

  • Processing of wild cereal grains in the Upper Palaeolithic revealed by starch grain analysis

    Dolores R. Piperno;Dolores R. Piperno;Ehud Weiss;Irene Holst;Dani Nadel

  • The Origins of Plant Cultivation and Domestication in the New World Tropics

    Dolores R. Piperno

  • Starch grains reveal early root crop horticulture in the Panamanian tropical forest

    Dolores R. Piperno;Anthony J. Ranere;Irene Holst;Patricia Hansell

  • The presence of starch grains on prehistoric stone tools from the humid neotropics : Indications of early tuber use and agriculture in Panama

    D.R. Piperno;I. Holst

  • The silica bodies of tropical American grasses : morphology, taxonomy, and implications for grass systematics and fossil phytolith identification

    Dolores R. Piperno;Deborah M. Pearsall

  • A 14 300-YR PALEOECOLOGICAL PROFILE OF A LOWLAND TROPICAL LAKE IN PANAMA'

    Mark B. Bush;Dolores R. Piperno;Paul A. Colinvaux;Paulo E. De Oliveira

  • Changes in starch grain morphologies from cooking

    Amanda G. Henry;Amanda G. Henry;Holly F. Hudson;Dolores R. Piperno;Dolores R. Piperno

  • The cultural and chronological context of early Holocene maize and squash domestication in the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico

    Anthony J. Ranere;Dolores R. Piperno;Irene Holst;Ruth Dickau

  • Starch grains on human teeth reveal early broad crop diet in northern Peru

    Dolores R. Piperno;Tom D. Dillehay

  • Using plant microfossils from dental calculus to recover human diet: a case study from Tell al-Raqā'i, Syria

    Amanda G. Henry;Dolores R. Piperno;Dolores R. Piperno

  • Late pleistocene temperature depression and vegetation change in Ecuadorian Amazonia

    Mark B. Bush;Paul A. Colinvaux;Michael C. Wiemann;Dolores R. Piperno

  • Phylogenetic relationships among domesticated and wild species of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) inferred from a mitochondrial gene: Implications for crop plant evolution and areas of origin

    Oris I. Sanjur;Dolores R. Piperno;Thomas C. Andres;Linda Wessel-Beaver

  • Plant foods and the dietary ecology of Neanderthals and early modern humans

    Amanda G. Henry;Alison S. Brooks;Dolores R. Piperno;Dolores R. Piperno

  • Climate Change and the Integrity of Science

    Jennifer Sills;P. H. Gleick;R. M. Adams;R. M. Amasino

  • Distinguishing rice ( Oryza sativa poaceae) from wild Oryza species through phytolith analysis, II Finalized method

    Zhijun Zhao;Deborah M. Pearsall;Robert A. Benfer;Dolores R. Piperno

  • Phytolith Analysis: An Archaeological and Geological Perspective

    Stanton W. Green;Dolores R. Piperno

Frequent Co-Authors

Crystal N. H. McMichael
Crystal N. H. McMichael University of Amsterdam
Mark B. Bush
Mark B. Bush Florida Institute of Technology
José Iriarte
José Iriarte University of Exeter
Tom D. Dillehay
Tom D. Dillehay Vanderbilt University
Klaus Winter
Klaus Winter Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Miles R. Silman
Miles R. Silman Wake Forest University
Matthew S. Lachniet
Matthew S. Lachniet University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Kent V. Flannery
Kent V. Flannery University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael W. Palace
Michael W. Palace University of New Hampshire
Leif Andersson
Leif Andersson Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dolores R. Piperno

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles