World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
8316
World Ranking
6002
National Ranking
2624

Hinrich Staecker publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hinrich Staecker sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 306 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Hinrich Staecker D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hinrich Staecker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hinrich Staecker is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on areas within neuroscience, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with notable emphases on sensory systems, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and otorhinolaryngology.

The scientist has made contributions across several topics related to auditory and vestibular health, including hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, hearing loss and rehabilitation, vestibular and auditory disorders, ear surgery and otitis media, extracellular vesicles in disease, RNA regulation and disease, and noise effects and management.

Staecker's frequent co-authors include:

  • Athanasia Warnecke
  • Thomas Lenarz
  • Jennifer Harre
  • Paul Van de Heyning
  • Mario Zernotti

They have published in various academic venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being:

  • Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Otology & Neurotology
  • Molecular Therapy
  • Frontiers in Neurology

Some recent and relevant papers by Hinrich Staecker include:

  • First-in-human intracochlear application of human stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles, 2021, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
  • Extracellular vesicles from human multipotent stromal cells protect against hearing loss after noise trauma in vivo, 2020, Clinical and Translational Medicine
  • Rescue of auditory function by a single administration of AAV-TMPRSS3 gene therapy in aged mice of human recessive deafness DFNB8, 2023, Molecular Therapy
  • Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy, 2022, The Journal of International Advanced Otology
  • Distinct MicroRNA Profiles in the Perilymph and Serum of Patients With Menière's Disease, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology

Best Publications

  • The effect of diabetes on sensorineural hearing loss.

    Venkata Kakarlapudi;Robert Sawyer;Hinrich Staecker

  • NT-3 and/or BDNF therapy prevents loss of auditory neurons following loss of hair cells.

    H. Staecker;R. Kopke;R. Kopke;Brigitte Malgrange;Philippe Lefèbvre

  • Oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of cochlear sensory cells: otoprotective strategies

    Tina C Huang;Alan G. Cheng;Howard Stupak;Wei Liu

  • Caspase inhibitors prevent cisplatin-induced apoptosis of auditory sensory cells.

    W. Liu;H. Staecker;H. Staecker;H. Stupak;Brigitte Malgrange

  • Steroid perfusion of the inner ear for sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of conventional therapy: a pilot study.

    Philippe P Lefebvre;Hinrich Staecker

  • Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system.

    H. Skarz̈yński;P.H. Van De Heyning;S. Agrawal;S.L. Arauz

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene therapy prevents spiral ganglion degeneration after hair cell loss

    Hinrich Staecker;Ramin Gabaizadeh;Howard Federoff;Thomas R. Van De Water

  • Vestibular hair cell regeneration and restoration of balance function induced by math1 gene transfer.

    Hinrich Staecker;Mark Praetorius;Kim Baker;Douglas E. Brough

  • Retinoic acid stimulates regeneration of mammalian auditory hair cells

    Philippe Lefèbvre;Brigitte Malgrange;H. Staecker;H. Staecker;Gustave Moonen

  • Gene Expression in the Mammalian Cochlea: A Study of Multiple Vector Systems

    Hinrich Staecker;Daqing Li;Bert W. O'Malley;Thomas R. Van De Water

  • Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: middle fossa versus retrosigmoid approach.

    Staecker H;Nadol Jb;Ojeman R;Ronner S

  • Local perfusion of the tumor necrosis factor alpha blocker infliximab to the inner ear improves autoimmune neurosensory hearing loss.

    F. Van Wijk;H. Staecker;E. Keithley;Philippe Lefèbvre

  • Caspases, the enemy within, and their role in oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of inner ear sensory cells.

    T. R. Van De Water;François Lallemend;A. A. Eshraghi;S. Ahsan

  • Impact of Diabetic Complications on Balance and Falls: Contribution of the Vestibular System

    Linda J. D'Silva;James Lin;Hinrich Staecker;Susan L. Whitney

  • Oxidative Stress in Aging in the C57B16/J Mouse Cochlea

    Hinrich Staecker;Qing Yin Zheng;Thomas R. Van De Water

  • Mechanisms of cell death in the injured auditory system: Otoprotective strategies

    Philippe P. Lefebvre;Brigitte Malgrange;François Lallemend;Hinrich Staecker

  • Neurotrophins affect survival and neuritogenesis by adult injured auditory neurons in vitro.

    Philippe Lefèbvre;Brigitte Malgrange;H. Staecker;M. Moghadass

  • Protection of both auditory hair cells and auditory neurons from cisplatin induced damage

    R. Gabaizadeh;H. Staecker;W. Liu;R. Kopke

  • Selective atonal gene delivery improves balance function in a mouse model of vestibular disease

    Christina Schlecker;Mark Praetorius;Mark Praetorius;Douglas E. Brough;Robert G. Presler

  • Patient-Based Outcomes in Patients With Primary Tinnitus Undergoing Tinnitus Retraining Therapy

    Julie A. Berry;Susan L. Gold;Ellen Alvarez Frederick;William C. Gray

Frequent Co-Authors

Brigitte Malgrange
Brigitte Malgrange University of Liège
Shin-ichi Usami
Shin-ichi Usami Shinshu University
Paul Van de Heyning
Paul Van de Heyning University of Antwerp
Luis Lassaletta
Luis Lassaletta Technical University of Madrid
Michael S. Detamore
Michael S. Detamore University of Oklahoma
Joseph B. Nadol
Joseph B. Nadol Harvard University
Mario Gimona
Mario Gimona Paracelsus Medical University
Michael J. McKenna
Michael J. McKenna Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Howard J. Federoff
Howard J. Federoff University of California, Irvine
Bernard Rogister
Bernard Rogister University of Liège

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Hinrich Staecker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles