World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
19181
World Ranking
17291
National Ranking
576

Graeme M. Clark publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme M. Clark sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 553 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Graeme M. Clark D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme M. Clark sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors
  • 2011 - Florey Medal, Australian Institute of Policy & Science for his invention of the bionic ear
  • 2004 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 2004 - Prime Minister's Prize for Science, Australia For the discoveries which led to the bionic ear
  • 1998 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science

Overview

Graeme M. Clark is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research is primarily situated in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a significant contribution to Medicine. Within these domains, their focused subfields include Molecular Biology, Genetics, Oncology, Cancer Research, and Hepatology.

Their academic work spans an array of main research topics such as Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research, Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting, Genomic Variations and Chromosomal Abnormalities, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Liver Diseases and Immunity, and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments.

Frequent publication venues for their work include Endocrine Abstracts, Human Molecular Genetics, Nature Metabolism, Genetics in Medicine, and Epigenomics.

Significant recent publications demonstrate their diverse research interests:

  • "Elongin C (ELOC/TCEB1)-associated von Hippel-Lindau disease," 2022, Human Molecular Genetics
  • "Metabolic profiling stratifies colorectal cancer and reveals adenosylhomocysteinase as a therapeutic target," 2023, Nature Metabolism
  • "ImprintSeq, a novel tool to interrogate DNA methylation at human imprinted regions and diagnose multilocus imprinting disturbance," 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • "Comparison of Methylation Episignatures in KMT2B- and KMT2D-Related Human Disorders," 2022, Epigenomics
  • "Human-correlated genetic models identify precision therapy for liver cancer," 2025, Nature

Their frequent co-authors include Jose-Ezequiel Martín, Eamonn R. Maher, Colin Nixon, Eguzkine Ochoa, and Sunwoo Lee, reflecting collaborative work in various aspects of genetics and molecular biology.

Throughout their career, Graeme M. Clark has been recognized by multiple awards:

  • Fellow, National Academy of Inventors, 2013
  • Florey Medal, Australian Institute of Policy & Science, 2011, for the invention of the bionic ear
  • Prime Minister's Prize for Science, Australia, 2004, for discoveries leading to the bionic ear
  • Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom, 2004
  • Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science, 1998

Best Publications

  • Clinical Findings for a Group of Infants and Young Children with Auditory Neuropathy

    Gary Rance;David E. Beer;Barbara Cone-Wesson;Robert K. Shepherd

  • Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation

    R. K. Shepherd;S. Hatsushika;Graeme M. Clark

  • Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation.

    Jin Xu;Shi-Ang Xu;Lawrence T. Cohen;Graeme M. Clark

  • Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.

    Skinner Mw;Clark Gm;Whitford La;Seligman Pm

  • Speech Perception as a Function of Electrical Stimulation Rate: Using the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System

    Andrew E. Vandali;Lesley A. Whitford;Kerrie L. Plant;Graeme M. Clark

  • Cochlear Implants: Fundamentals and Applications

    Graeme Clark

  • The Automated Prediction of Hearing Thresholds in Sleeping Subjects Using Auditory Steady-State Evoked Potentials

    Gary Rance;Field W. Rickards;Lawrence T. Cohen;Sandra De Vidi

  • Polypyrrole-coated electrodes for the delivery of charge and neurotrophins to cochlear neurons

    Rachael T Richardson;Andrew K Wise;Brianna C Thompson;Brianna O Flynn

  • Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients.

    Peter J. Blamey;Brian C. Pyman;Michael Gordon;Graeme M. Clark

  • The effect of polypyrrole with incorporated neurotrophin-3 on the promotion of neurite outgrowth from auditory neurons.

    Rachael T. Richardson;Brianna Thompson;Simon Moulton;Carrie Newbold

  • Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: A physiological and histopathological study

    Jin Xu;Robert K. Shepherd;Robert K. Shepherd;Rodney E. Millard;Rodney E. Millard;Graeme M. Clark;Graeme M. Clark

  • Skeletal muscle cell proliferation and differentiation on polypyrrole substrates doped with extracellular matrix components

    Kerry J. Gilmore;Magdalena Kita;Yao Han;Amy Gelmi

  • Resprouting and survival of guinea pig cochlear neurons in response to the administration of the neurotrophins brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3.

    Andrew K. Wise;Rachael Richardson;Jennifer Hardman;Graeme Clark

  • The University of Melbourne-Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant

    Clark Gm;Blamey Pj;Brown Am;Gusby Pa

  • Conducting polymers, dual neurotrophins and pulsed electrical stimulation - Dramatic effects on neurite outgrowth

    Brianna C. Thompson;Rachael T. Richardson;Rachael T. Richardson;Simon E. Moulton;Alison J. Evans;Alison J. Evans

  • Steady-state Evoked Potential and Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Group of Children with Absent Click-evoked Auditory Brain Stem Response

    Gary Rance;Richard C. Dowell;Field W. Rickards;David E. Beer

  • Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation

    A. Kawano;H. L. Seldon;G. M. Clark;R. T. Ramsden

  • Optimising the incorporation and release of a neurotrophic factor using conducting polypyrrole

    Brianna C Thompson;Simon E Moulton;Jie Ding;Rachael Richardson

  • BDNF-induced survival of auditory neurons in vivo: Cessation of treatment leads to accelerated loss of survival effects.

    Lisa N. Gillespie;Graeme M. Clark;Perry F. Bartlett;Phillip L. Marzella

  • Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants

    J.Z. Sarant;P.J. Blamey;R.C. Dowell;G.M. Clark

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert K. Shepherd
Robert K. Shepherd University of Melbourne
Gordon G. Wallace
Gordon G. Wallace University of Wollongong
Simon E. Moulton
Simon E. Moulton Swinburne University of Technology
Anthony N. Burkitt
Anthony N. Burkitt University of Melbourne
Colette M. McKay
Colette M. McKay Bionics Institute
Hugh J. McDermott
Hugh J. McDermott University of Melbourne
Roy M. Robins-Browne
Roy M. Robins-Browne University of Melbourne
Joselito M. Razal
Joselito M. Razal Deakin University
David B. Grayden
David B. Grayden University of Melbourne
Perry F. Bartlett
Perry F. Bartlett University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare can offer flexibility and affordability—particularly for students balancing work, family, or financial constraints. For current Registered Nurses who want to advance their qualifications, there are many rn to bsn cheapest programs online, making it easier and more affordable to further your education. These programs are designed to build on existing nursing knowledge and skills while accommodating busy schedules.

If you have a non-nursing bachelor's degree but are considering a fast transition into advanced nursing roles, non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs provide a direct route to a master’s in nursing, saving time and opening doors to more advanced positions.

Finding what is the easiest nursing school to get into can also help prospective students pursue a healthcare career without overly competitive admissions, ensuring more accessible education pathways.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are accredited medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, allowing students to pursue online certification with the support of financial aid.

Best Scientists Citing Graeme M. Clark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles