World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
6541
World Ranking
5842
National Ranking
2564

Bryan E. Pfingst publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan E. Pfingst sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 148 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bryan E. Pfingst D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan E. Pfingst sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bryan E. Pfingst is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their primary field of study is neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, speech and hearing, biomedical engineering, and plant science. The bulk of their research contributions fall within the scope of hearing loss and rehabilitation, cochlear and tinnitus studies, noise effects and management, and neural dynamics related to brain function.

The scientist has made contributions across several main topics including:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies

Pfingst's research has been published widely, particularly in venues related to auditory neuroscience and hearing research. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Hearing Research
  • Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Ear and Hearing
  • JASA Express Letters

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Pfingst are:

  • "Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants," 2020, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
  • "Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function," 2023, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
  • "Relationships between Intrascalar Tissue, Neuron Survival, and Cochlear Implant Function," 2020, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
  • "How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance," 2020, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "A Broadly Applicable Method for Characterizing the Slope of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude Growth Function," 2021, Ear and Hearing

Pfingst has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Kara C. Schvartz-Leyzac
  • Deborah J. Colesa
  • Donald L. Swiderski
  • Yehoash Raphael
  • Christopher J. Buswinka

Best Publications

  • Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition

    Li Xu;Catherine S. Thompson;Bryan E. Pfingst

  • Relation of psychophysical data to histopathology in monkeys with cochlear implants.

    Bryan E. Pfingst;Dwight Sutton;Josef M. Miller;Barbara A. Bohne

  • Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.

    Li Xu;Yuhjung Tsai;Bryan E. Pfingst

  • Reaction−time procedure for measurement of hearing. I. Suprathreshold functions

    Bryan E. Pfingst;Robert Hienz;Joseph Kimm;Josef Miller

  • Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception (L)

    Li Xu;Li Xu;Bryan E. Pfingst

  • Single cell activity in the auditory cortex of rhesus monkeys: Behavioral dependency

    J. M. Miller;D. Sutton;B. Pfingst;A. Ryan

  • The use of a dual PEDOT and RGD-functionalized alginate hydrogel coating to provide sustained drug delivery and improved cochlear implant function

    Jennifer A. Chikar;Jeffrey L. Hendricks;Sarah M. Richardson-Burns;Yehoash Raphael

  • Transgenic BDNF induces nerve fiber regrowth into the auditory epithelium in deaf cochleae.

    Seiji B. Shibata;Sarah R. Cortez;Lisa A. Beyer;James A. Wiler

  • Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: implications for auditory prostheses.

    Li Xu;Bryan E. Pfingst

  • Importance of cochlear health for implant function

    Bryan E. Pfingst;Ning Zhou;Deborah J. Colesa;Melissa M. Watts

  • Characteristics of neurons in auditory cortex of monkeys performing a simple auditory task.

    Unknown

  • Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants

    Bryan E. Pfingst;Teresa A. Zwolan;Lisa A. Holloway

  • Relation of cochlear implant function to histopathology in monkeys.

    Bryan E. Pfingst;Dwight Sutton

  • Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.

    Spelman Fa;Clopton Bm;Pfingst Be

  • Effects of Electrode Configuration and Place of Stimulation on Speech Perception with Cochlear Prostheses

    Bryan E. Pfingst;Kevin H. Franck;Li Xu;Erik M. Bauer

  • Nerve Maintenance and Regeneration in the Damaged Cochlea

    Seiji B. Shibata;Cameron L. Budenz;Sara A. Bowling;Bryan E. Pfingst

  • Pure tone thresholds for the rhesus monkey

    Bryan E. Pfingst;Jim Laycock;Frank Flammino;Brenda Lonsbury-Martin

  • Over-expression of BDNF by adenovirus with concurrent electrical stimulation improves cochlear implant thresholds and survival of auditory neurons.

    Jennifer A. Chikar;Deborah J. Colesa;Donald L. Swiderski;Adriana Di Polo

  • Response plasticity of neurons in auditory cortex of the rhesus monkey.

    B. E. Pfingst;T. A. O'Connor;J. M. Miller

  • Using Temporal Modulation Sensitivity to Select Stimulation Sites for Processor MAPs in Cochlear Implant Listeners

    Soha N. Garadat;Teresa A. Zwolan;Bryan E. Pfingst

  • Effects of Hearing Preservation on Psychophysical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation

    Stephen Y. Kang;Deborah J. Colesa;Donald L. Swiderski;Gina L. Su

Frequent Co-Authors

Yehoash Raphael
Yehoash Raphael University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Josef M. Miller
Josef M. Miller University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jochen Schacht
Jochen Schacht University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John C. Middlebrooks
John C. Middlebrooks University of California, Irvine
Tomas Albrektsson
Tomas Albrektsson University of Gothenburg
Mats Ulfendahl
Mats Ulfendahl Karolinska Institute
Sandra L. McFadden
Sandra L. McFadden University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Haim Sohmer
Haim Sohmer Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Merav Ahissar
Merav Ahissar Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Anne E. Kwitek
Anne E. Kwitek Medical College of Wisconsin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience often opens doors to diverse online degrees and career opportunities in related fields. Many students find connections between neuroscience, social work, psychology, and applied behavioral analysis, leading them to seek further education or professional credentials online.

For those interested in clinical or community support roles, consider the cheapest online master's in social work or look into online msw programs tailored for speed and affordability. These prepare graduates for rewarding positions supporting individuals and communities.

If your interests align with behavior analysis, there are targeted bcba online masters programs designed to support careers as Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBA), a growing area in therapy and education.

Those seeking an accelerated route into mental health and counseling should also explore colleges with accelerated psychology programs. These programs can fast-track your journey toward professional qualifications in psychology, opening up various career pathways closely related to neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Bryan E. Pfingst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles