World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
6746
World Ranking
9432
National Ranking
4996

J. Bruce Overmier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Bruce Overmier sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

J. Bruce Overmier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Bruce Overmier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1976 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

J. Bruce Overmier is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 1976.

Overmier's academic contributions are recorded without specific details on recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues. No data on book publications or exact main and subfields of study are provided.

The available record does not include titles or years of publication for any papers, nor a listing of research topics or specialized fields of study. Consequently, no enumerations of such items can be provided.

The acknowledgment as an APA Fellow indicates engagement with the broader field of psychology, though exact areas of research focus, including main topics or subfields, remain unspecified.

There is no indication that Overmier is deceased, suggesting ongoing affiliation with the University of Minnesota.

Best Publications

  • Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding.

    J. Bruce Overmier;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Pavlovian conditioned stimulus effects upon instrumental choice behavior are reinforcer specific

    John M. Kruse;J.Bruce Overmier;Wilbert A. Konz;Eric Rokke

  • The neurobiology of stress ulcers

    G B Glavin;R Murison;J B Overmier;W P Pare

  • Affect, conditioning, and cognition : essays on the determinants of behavior

    F. Robert Brush;J. Bruce Overmier;Richard L. Solomon

  • Pavlovian Conditioning and the Mediation of behavior1

    J. Bruce Overmier;Janice A. Lawry

  • On learned helplessness.

    J. Bruce Overmier;J. Bruce Overmier

  • Inflammatory pathogenesis in Alzheimer's disease: biological mechanisms and cognitive sequeli.

    Ethan Gahtan;J.Bruce Overmier

  • Effects of an exogenous β-amyloid peptide on retention for spatial learning

    Michael P. McDonald;Eric E. Dahl;J. Bruce Overmier;Patrick Mantyh;Patrick Mantyh

  • Sensitization, conditioning, and learning: can they help us understand somatization and disability?

    J. Bruce Overmier

  • Teleost telencephalon and learning: An interpretive review of data and hypotheses☆

    Nancy C. Flood;J.Bruce Overmier;George E. Savage

  • Discriminative cue properties of different fears and their role in response selection in dogs.

    Unknown

  • Expectancies as Factors Influencing Conditional Discrimination Performance of Children

    Pauline Maki;J. Bruce Overmier;Sandra Delos;Arlyne J. Gutmann

  • Cardiac responses to shock in curarized dogs: effects of shock intensity and duration, warning signal, and prior experience with shock.

    Church Rm;LoLordo;Overmier Jb;Solomon Rl

  • A reevaluation of Rescorla's early dictums about Pavlovian conditioned inhibition.

    Douglas A. Williams;J. Bruce Overmier;Vincent M. LoLordo

  • Environmental Contingencies as Sources of Stress in Animals

    J. Bruce Overmier;Jeff Patterson;Richard M. Wielkiewicz

  • Interference with avoidance behavior: Failure to avoid traumatic shock.

    Unknown

  • Within-compound associations modulate the relative effectiveness of differential and Pavlovian conditioned inhibition procedures.

    Douglas A. Williams;Gary M. Travis;J. Bruce Overmier

  • Improving Face Recognition in Alcohol Dementia

    Angela K. Hochhalter;Whitney A. Sweeney;Bruce L. Bakke;Richard J. Holub

  • Anxiety and helplessness in the face of stress predisposes, precipitates, and sustains gastric ulceration.

    J B Overmier;R Murison

  • Inhibition of return in aging and Alzheimer's disease: performance as a function of task demands and stimulus timing.

    L K Langley;L J Fuentes;A K Hochhalter;J Brandt

  • Differential outcomes effect in children and adults with down syndrome.

    Angeles F. Estévez;Luis J. Fuentes;J. Bruce Overmier;Carmen González

  • On unpredictability as a causal factor in “learned helplessness”

    J.Bruce Overmier;Richard M Wielkiewicz

  • IAAP Handbook of Applied Psychology

    Paul R. Martin;Fanny M. Cheung;Michael C. Knowles;Michael Kyrios

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Murison
Robert Murison University of Bergen
Luis J. Fuentes
Luis J. Fuentes University of Murcia
Paul Martin
Paul Martin University of Bristol
Ovidiu Lungu
Ovidiu Lungu University of Montreal
Patrick W. Mantyh
Patrick W. Mantyh University of Arizona
Michael Kyrios
Michael Kyrios Flinders University
Holger Ursin
Holger Ursin University of Bergen
Fanny M. Cheung
Fanny M. Cheung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Kathleen M. Thomas
Kathleen M. Thomas University of Minnesota
Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding career paths. One popular option for graduates is pursuing Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification. Becoming a BCBA typically requires a graduate degree in psychology or a related field, supervised practical experience, and passing a certification exam.

Each location may have unique requirements or processes. For example, you can learn about bcba certification requirements in Arlington or explore the steps for becoming a bcba in Atlanta. In addition, if you are interested in pursuing this pathway in Colorado, you should review details on how to become a bcba in Aurora, and for Texans, the guide to becoming a bcba in Austin is particularly relevant.

Online psychology degrees provide flexibility for students balancing school, work, and family. Graduates can pursue roles in counseling, human resources, social work, education, and research. Exploring regional BCBA requirements will help you prepare for certification and expand your career opportunities within the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing J. Bruce Overmier

Trending Scientists