World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5210 4833 49 48 160 10801

Fanny M. Cheung publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fanny M. Cheung between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fanny M. Cheung published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2009. 1 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2009. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fanny M. Cheung: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 2
1983 1
1984 2
1985 2
1986 2
1987 2
1988 2
1989 3
1990 1
1991 4
1992 3
1993 4
1994 0
1995 2
1996 3
1997 4
1998 3
1999 0
2000 3
2001 1
2002 5
2003 8
2004 5
2005 3
2006 7
2007 2
2008 13
2009 17
2010 8
2011 7
2012 8
2013 6
2014 5
2015 7
2016 5
2017 3
2018 4
2019 7
2020 8
2021 0
2022 1
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 177
Download as CSV

Fanny M. Cheung publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fanny M. Cheung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 160
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Fanny M. Cheung D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fanny M. Cheung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fanny M. Cheung is affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong in China. Their research spans multiple interrelated fields within the social sciences, primarily focusing on psychology and health professions. The body of work covers various subfields, including sociology and political science, gender studies, clinical psychology, applied psychology, and social psychology.

Their research topics encompass a range of themes such as gender roles and identity studies, psychological testing and assessment, academic and historical perspectives in psychology, personality traits and psychology, psychotherapy techniques and applications, early childhood education and development, and social and intergroup psychology.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Editorial to special issue "Personality and individual differences and healthy organizations", 2020, published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • Culture and Personality Assessment, 2023, published in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology
  • Index, 2020, published by Cambridge University Press eBooks

Fanny M. Cheung has collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Diane F. Halpern, Sumaya Laher, Annamaria Di Fabio, José María Peiró Silla, and Mary P. Koss. Diane F. Halpern is the most frequent coauthor, with eleven joint publications.

Their work is primarily published in venues such as:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks

Best Publications

  • The role of meaning in life and optimism in promoting well-being

    Man Yee Ho;Fanny M. Cheung;Shu Fai Cheung

  • Differences in Managerial Values: A Study of U.S., Hong Kong and PRC Managers

    David A. Ralston;David J. Gustafson;Fanny M. Cheung;Robert H. Terpstra

  • Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory

    Fanny M. Cheung;Kwok Leung;Ruth M. Fan;Wei-Zheng Song

  • Indigenous Chinese Personality Constructs Is the Five-Factor Model Complete?

    Fanny M. Cheung;Kwok Leung;Jian-Xin Zhang;Hai-Fa Sun

  • Women at the top: powerful leaders define success as work + family in a culture of gender.

    Fanny M. Cheung;Diane F. Halpern

  • Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture

    Fanny M. Cheung;Fons J. R. van de Vijver;Frederick T. L. Leong

  • Eastern values : a comparison of managers in the United States, Hong Kong, and the People's Republic of China

    David A. Ralston;David J. Gustafson;Priscilla M. Elsass;Fanny Cheung

  • Comparative stigma of HIV/AIDS, SARS, and tuberculosis in Hong Kong.

    Winnie W.S. Mak;Phoenix K.H. Mo;Rebecca Y.M. Cheung;Jean Woo

  • Indigenous Personality Measures Chinese Examples

    Fanny M. Cheung;Kwok Leung

  • A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology

    Barbara M. Byrne;Thomas Oakland;Frederick T. L. Leong;Fons J. R. van de Vijver

  • The English Version of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory

    Fanny M. Cheung;Shu Fai Cheung;Kwok Leung;Colleen Ward

  • Somatization among Chinese depressives in general practice.

    Fanny M. Cheung;Bernard W. K. Lau;Edith Waldmann

  • Relevance of Openness as a Personality Dimension in Chinese Culture Aspects of its Cultural Relevance

    Fanny M. Cheung;Shu Fai Cheung;Jianxin Zhang;Kwok Leung

  • Going beyond self‐esteem to predict life satisfaction: The Chinese case

    Sylvia Xiaohua Chen;Fanny M. Cheung;Michael Harris Bond;Jin-Pang Leung

  • Use of Western and Indigenously Developed Personality Tests in Asia

    Fanny M. Cheung

  • Decomposing the construct of ambivalence over emotional expression in a Chinese cultural context

    Sylvia Xiaohua Chen;Fanny M. Cheung;Michael Harris Bond;Jin‐Pang Leung

  • Psychological symptoms among Chinese in urban Hong Kong

    Fanny M. Cheung

  • Social support and psychological adjustment to SARS: the mediating role of self-care self-efficacy.

    Winnie W.S. Mak;Rita W. Law;Jean Woo;Fanny M. Cheung

  • Indigenous Measures of Personality Assessment in Asian Countries: A Review.

    Fanny M. Cheung;Shu Fai Cheung;Sayuri Wada;Jianxin Zhang

  • Women at the Top

    Diane F. Halpern;Fanny M. Cheung

  • Personality and Life Events as Predictors of Adolescents’ Life Satisfaction: Do Life Events Mediate the Link Between Personality and Life Satisfaction?

    Man Yee Ho;Fanny M. Cheung;Shu Fai Cheung

  • From Chinese to Cross-Cultural Personality Inventory A Combined Emic-Etic Approach to the Study of Personality in Culture

    Fanny M. Cheung Shu Fai Cheung;Weiqiao Fan

  • Social Origins of Distress and Disease: Depression, Neurasthenia, and Pain in Modern China.

    Fanny M. Cheung;Arthur Kleinman

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick T. L. Leong
Frederick T. L. Leong Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Diane F. Halpern
Diane F. Halpern Claremont McKenna College
Kwok Leung
Kwok Leung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Winnie W. S. Mak
Winnie W. S. Mak Chinese University of Hong Kong
Jean Woo
Jean Woo Chinese University of Hong Kong
Catherine So-kum Tang
Catherine So-kum Tang Hong Kong Shue Yan University
Barbara M. Byrne
Barbara M. Byrne University of Ottawa
Michael Bond
Michael Bond Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Sylvia Xiaohua Chen
Sylvia Xiaohua Chen Hong Kong Polytechnic University
James N. Butcher
James N. Butcher University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to diverse opportunities, especially in the field of mental health counseling. Many students choose to pursue online psychology degrees, which offer flexible pathways to licensure and a variety of specializations.

Requirements to become a counselor vary by location. For instance, those interested in how to become a mental health counselor in Austin should be aware of the unique local regulations and educational needs for practice. Similarly, understanding the Bakersfield mental health counselor certification requirements can help you prepare for the right licensing paths in California.

In Maryland, individuals can review guides on how to become a mental health counselor in Baltimore to get details on coursework, supervised experience, and state exams. For those planning to work in Idaho, the mental health counselor requirements in Boise provide a roadmap to entering the profession.

Whether you’re passionate about clinical practice, research, or community outreach, earning an online psychology degree can help you meet state-specific requirements while building a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Fanny M. Cheung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles