World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Barbara M. Byrne

Barbara M. Byrne

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
99146
World Ranking
2883
National Ranking
171

Barbara M. Byrne publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara M. Byrne sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Barbara M. Byrne D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara M. Byrne sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barbara M. Byrne is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with specific attention to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Additional subfields include Social Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications, Sociology and Political Science, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The main topics covered in their work comprise:

  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Potassium and Related Disorders
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Their recent published papers include:

  • Use of metolazone in the community setting for heart failure decompensation: is it worthwhile?, 2022, British Journal of Cardiac Nursing
  • Aetiologies of heart failure in Nepal: a scoping review, 2025, British Journal of Cardiac Nursing

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Urmila Phuyal
  • David Matsumoto
  • Alan Williams

Barbara M. Byrne has contributed most frequently to the British Journal of Cardiac Nursing where multiple publications have appeared.

Best Publications

  • Structural Equation Modeling With Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, And Programming

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • Structural Equation Modeling With Lisrel, Prelis, and Simplis: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance.

    Barbara M. Byrne;Richard J. Shavelson;Bengt Muthén

  • Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Measuring Instrument

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/WINDOWS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • A Multifaceted Academic Self-Concept: Its Hierarchical Structure and Its Relation to Academic Achievement

    Herbert W. Marsh;Barbara M. Byrne;Richard J. Shavelson

  • Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows

    George R. Franke;Barbara M. Byrne

  • The General/Academic Self-Concept Nomological Network: A Review of Construct Validation Research

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using AMOS Graphics: A Road Less Traveled

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • Burnout: Testing for the Validity, Replication, and Invariance of Causal Structure Across Elementary, Intermediate, and Secondary Teachers:

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • Cross-Cultural Comparisons and the Presumption of Equivalent Measurement and Theoretical Structure A Look Beneath the Surface

    Barbara M. Byrne;T. Leanne Campbell

  • Testing for Measurement and Structural Equivalence in Large-Scale Cross-Cultural Studies: Addressing the Issue of Nonequivalence

    Barbara M. Byrne;Fons J. R. van de Vijver

  • Measuring Self-Concept Across the Life Span: Issues and Instrumentation

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • The Issue Of Measurement Invariance Revisited

    Barbara M. Byrne;David Watkins

  • Factor analytic models: viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives.

    Barbara M. Byrne

  • On the Structure of Adolescent Self-Concept.

    Barbara M. Byrne;Richard J. Shavelson

  • Teacher's Corner: The MACS Approach to Testing for Multigroup Invariance of a Second-Order Structure--A Walk through the Process.

    Barbara M. Byrne;Sunita M. Stewart

  • Measurement equivalence: a comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory.

    Nambury S. Raju;Larry J. Laffitte;Barbara M. Byrne

  • Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations

    Herbert W. Marsh;Barbara M. Byrne;Alexander Seeshing Yeung

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry H. Schneider
Barry H. Schneider Boston College
Herbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh Australian Catholic University
Frederick T. L. Leong
Frederick T. L. Leong Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Fons J. R. van de Vijver Tilburg University
Fanny M. Cheung
Fanny M. Cheung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Sunita M. Stewart
Sunita M. Stewart The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lennart Melin
Lennart Melin Uppsala University
Rhonda Craven
Rhonda Craven Australian Catholic University
Marise Ph. Born
Marise Ph. Born Erasmus University Rotterdam
Alexander Seeshing Yeung
Alexander Seeshing Yeung Australian Catholic University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens up a wide variety of career pathways, both in clinical and applied settings. With the rise of online programs, more students are taking flexible routes to advance in specialized areas, such as applied behavior analysis.

Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a sought-after credential for those interested in behavioral therapy and interventions. The process for becoming a bcba in Stockton or other cities involves completing a graduate degree, supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA exam.

Local requirements can vary, so it's essential to understand specific guidelines, such as bcba certification requirements in Tampa or how the pathway might differ if you're becoming a bcba in Toledo.

When exploring options, students should also be aware of unique Tucson bcba education requirements to ensure all local criteria are met. Online degrees can pave the way to these rewarding careers, especially for those who need the convenience of remote learning while meeting certification standards.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara M. Byrne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles