World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
57059
World Ranking
5079
National Ranking
498

Peter Langhorne publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Langhorne sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 469 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Langhorne D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Langhorne sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Langhorne is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly focusing on stroke and related cardiovascular health topics. Their work spans epidemiology, rehabilitation, cardiology, psychiatry, and general health professions, reflecting a broad engagement with diverse medical subfields.

The research undertaken by Peter Langhorne places significant emphasis on stroke rehabilitation and recovery as well as acute ischemic stroke management. Other main topics addressed in their publications include dementia and cognitive impairment research, blood pressure and hypertension studies, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, cardiac health, mental health, and neurological disorders involving botulinum toxin.

Peter Langhorne's recent notable publications include:

  • Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta-analysis, 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • The state of stroke services across the globe: Report of World Stroke Organization-World Health Organization surveys, 2021, International Journal of Stroke
  • Is Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Admission Avoidance Hospital at Home an Alternative to Hospital Admission for Older Persons?, 2021, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Alcohol Intake as a Risk Factor for Acute Stroke, 2022, Neurology
  • Sleep Patterns and the Risk of Acute Stroke, 2023, Neurology

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Peter Langhorne include Salim Yusuf, Martin O'Donnell, Graeme J. Hankey, Shahram Oveisgharan, and Helle K. Iversen. These collaborative relationships suggest active engagement with prominent researchers in related fields.

The primary venues where Peter Langhorne's work has been published are:

  • International Journal of Stroke
  • Neurology
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • Stroke
  • BMJ Open

Through their extensive output of publications, Peter Langhorne has contributed 191 works to the field of medicine, with a strong focus on epidemiology and rehabilitation. The thematic focus on stroke rehabilitation and acute stroke management marks a consistent thread throughout their research career.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008

    Peter A. Ringleb;Marie Germaine Bousser;Gary Ford;Philip Bath

  • Stroke Care 2: Stroke rehabilitation

    Peter Langhorne;Julie Bernhardt;Gert Kwakkel

  • Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review

    Peter Langhorne;Fiona Coupar;Alex Pollock

  • Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study

    Martin J O'Donnell;Martin J O'Donnell;Siu Lim Chin;Sumathy Rangarajan;Denis Xavier

  • Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital

    Graham Ellis;Mike Gardner;Apostolos Tsiachristas;Peter Langhorne

  • Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke

    Lindsay Govan;Peter Langhorne;Martin Dennis;Graeme Hankey

  • Medical Complications After Stroke A Multicenter Study

    P. Langhorne;D. J. Stott;L. Robertson;J. MacDonald

  • Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke A Meta-Analysis

    Gert Kwakkel;Roland van Peppen;Robert C. Wagenaar;Sharon Wood Dauphinee

  • Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Graham Ellis;Martin A Whitehead;David Robinson;Desmond O’Neill

  • Thrombophilia in pregnancy: a systematic review

    L. Robertson;O. Wu;P. Langhorne;S. Twaddle

  • European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management-update 2003.

    Gunnel E. Carlsson;Anders Möller;Christian Blomstrand;Takashi Ueda

  • Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke

    Alex Pollock;Sybil E Farmer;Marian C Brady;Peter Langhorne

  • Do stroke units save lives

    P. Langhorne;B.O. Williams;W. Gilchrist;K. Howie

  • Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised in-patient (stroke unit) care after stroke.

    K Asplund;P Berman;C Blomstrand;M Dennis

  • Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke

    Alex Pollock;Gillian Baer;Pauline Campbell;Pei Ling Choo

  • Screening for thrombophilia in high-risk situations: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) study

    O. Wu;L. Robertson;S. Twaddle;G. D. Lowe

  • Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial

    Julie Bernhardt;Peter Langhorne;Richard I. Lindley;Amanda G. Thrift

  • Barthel Index for Stroke Trials: Development, Properties, and Application

    Terence J. Quinn;Peter Langhorne;David J. Stott

  • Association of gait and balance disorders with age-related white matter changes The LADIS Study

    H. Baezner;C. Blahak;A. Poggesi;L. Pantoni

  • Thyroid Hormone Therapy for Older Adults with Subclinical Hypothyroidism.

    David J. Stott;Nicolas Rodondi;Patricia M. Kearney;Ian Ford

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Stott
David J. Stott University of Glasgow
Julie Bernhardt
Julie Bernhardt Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Martin Dennis
Martin Dennis University of Edinburgh
Amanda G. Thrift
Amanda G. Thrift Monash University
José M. Ferro
José M. Ferro University of Lisbon
Anthony Rudd
Anthony Rudd King's College London
Michael G. Hennerici
Michael G. Hennerici Heidelberg University
Domenico Inzitari
Domenico Inzitari University of Florence
Timo Erkinjuntti
Timo Erkinjuntti University of Helsinki
Charles Warlow
Charles Warlow University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering a career in healthcare, there are several flexible and accelerated pathways available online. Many students look for programs that offer greater convenience, whether that means fewer clinical requirements or a faster route to graduation.

Nurses interested in advancing their qualifications can explore an rn to bsn with no clinicals degree, enabling them to earn a bachelor's with less time in clinical settings. For those seeking the highest level of nursing practice, the demand for the fastest dnp program is on the rise, as these allow experienced RNs to earn their doctorate swiftly.

Additionally, students who need even more flexibility can consider online dnp programs without clinicals. These options help working professionals balance demands of study and career. Those aiming to enter nursing quickly may want to research what is the fastest way to become an lpn to begin their employment in healthcare with efficient training.

By exploring these various online degree options, aspiring medical professionals can tailor their education to fit their schedules and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Langhorne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles