World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
72
Citations
24334
World Ranking
2269
National Ranking
55

Julie Bernhardt publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Bernhardt sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 347 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Julie Bernhardt D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Bernhardt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie Bernhardt is affiliated with the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on medicine with a significant emphasis on rehabilitation.

The main fields of study addressed in their work include:

  • Medicine

Within medicine, the key subfields they have contributed to are:

  • Rehabilitation
  • Epidemiology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • General Health Professions

Bernhardt's work covers a range of topics connected to stroke and rehabilitation, including:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Significant recent publications include:

  • "The state of stroke services across the globe: Report of World Stroke Organization-World Health Organization surveys" (2021), published in International Journal of Stroke
  • "Stroke rehabilitation in low-income and middle-income countries: a call to action" (2020), published in The Lancet
  • "A randomized control trial of intensive aphasia therapy after acute stroke: The Very Early Rehabilitation for SpEech (VERSE) study" (2020), published in International Journal of Stroke
  • "Advancing Stroke Recovery Through Improved Articulation of Nonpharmacological Intervention Dose" (2021), published in Stroke
  • "Cognitive Deficits After Stroke" (2022), published in Stroke

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Leonid Churilov
  • Kathryn S. Hayward
  • Vincent Thijs
  • Ruby Lipson-Smith
  • Hannah Johns

Bernhardt publishes predominantly in the following journals:

  • Stroke
  • International Journal of Stroke
  • Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal

Best Publications

  • Stroke Care 2: Stroke rehabilitation

    Peter Langhorne;Julie Bernhardt;Gert Kwakkel

  • Physical Activity and Exercise Recommendations for Stroke Survivors A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Sandra A. Billinger;Ross A. Arena;Julie Bernhardt;Janice J. Eng

  • Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce:

    Julie Bernhardt;Kathryn S Hayward;Kathryn S Hayward;Gert Kwakkel;Gert Kwakkel;Nick S Ward

  • Inactive and Alone Physical Activity Within the First 14 Days of Acute Stroke Unit Care

    Julie Bernhardt;Helen M Dewey;Helen M Dewey;Amanda G Thrift;Amanda G Thrift;Geoffrey A Donnan;Geoffrey A Donnan

  • Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial

    Julie Bernhardt;Peter Langhorne;Richard I. Lindley;Amanda G. Thrift

  • Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

    Gert Kwakkel;Natasha A. Lannin;Karen Borschmann;Coralie English

  • A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial for Stroke (AVERT) Phase II Safety and Feasibility

    Julie Bernhardt;Julie Bernhardt;Helen M Dewey;Amanda G Thrift;Janice M Collier

  • Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Bruce C V Campbell;Henry Ma;Henry Ma;Peter A Ringleb;Mark W Parsons

  • Motivational interviewing to increase physical activity in people with chronic health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Paul O'Halloran;Felicity Blackstock;Nora Shields;Anne E Holland

  • Very Early Mobilization After Stroke Fast-Tracks Return to Walking Further Results From the Phase II AVERT Randomized Controlled Trial

    Toby B. Cumming;Amanda G. Thrift;Janice M. Collier;Leonid Churilov

  • How Physically Active Are People Following Stroke? Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis

    Natalie A. Fini;Anne E. Holland;Jenny Keating;Jacinta Simek

  • Stroke Survivors' Experiences of Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

    Julie Luker;Julie Luker;Elizabeth Lynch;Susanne Bernhardsson;Leanne Bennett

  • Balance and mobility outcomes for stroke patients: a comprehensive audit.

    Kieth Hill;Paul Ellis;Julie Bernhardt;Patricia Maggs

  • Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors in People With Stroke Living in the Community: A Systematic Review

    Coralie English;Patricia J. Manns;Claire Tucak;Julie Bernhardt

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination are both valid cognitive tools in stroke.

    T. B. Cumming;L. Churilov;T. Linden;T. Linden;J. Bernhardt

  • An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke

    Joel Salinas;Sara M. Sprinkhuizen;Teri Ackerson;Julie Bernhardt

  • An enriched environment increases activity in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in a mixed rehabilitation unit: a pilot non-randomized controlled trial

    Heidi Janssen;Louise Ada;Julie Bernhardt;Patrick McElduff

  • Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients.

    Tanya West;Julie Bernhardt

  • Sitting and Activity Time in People With Stroke

    Coralie English;Genevieve N. Healy;Alison Coates;Lucy Lewis

  • Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)

    Julie Bernhardt;Leonid Churilov;Fiona Ellery;Janice Collier

  • Loss of skeletal muscle mass after stroke: a systematic review.

    Coralie English;Holly McLennan;Kerry Thoirs;Alison Coates

  • Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care.

    Julie Bernhardt;James Chan;Ilona Nicola;Janice M Collier

Frequent Co-Authors

Amanda G. Thrift
Amanda G. Thrift Monash University
Peter Langhorne
Peter Langhorne University of Glasgow
Geoffrey A. Donnan
Geoffrey A. Donnan University of Melbourne
Graeme J. Hankey
Graeme J. Hankey University of Western Australia
Michael Nilsson
Michael Nilsson University of Newcastle Australia
Miranda Rose
Miranda Rose La Trobe University
Audrey Holland
Audrey Holland University of Arizona
Vincent Thijs
Vincent Thijs Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Amy Brodtmann
Amy Brodtmann Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Gert Kwakkel
Gert Kwakkel University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Julie Bernhardt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles