World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
30358
World Ranking
13566
National Ranking
1260

Peter von Dadelszen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter von Dadelszen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 482 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter von Dadelszen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter von Dadelszen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter von Dadelszen is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions to the subfields of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

The main topics addressed in their work encompass pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, birth, development, and health, maternal and fetal healthcare, global maternal and child health, the impact of COVID-19 on reproduction, gestational diabetes research and management, and maternal and perinatal health interventions.

The scientist has published extensively in various academic venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Pregnancy Hypertension
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • The Lancet Global Health

Recent notable papers include:

  • Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet Global Health
  • The 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice, 2021, Pregnancy Hypertension
  • Change in the Incidence of Stillbirth and Preterm Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, JAMA
  • Preeclampsia, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy: coverage and safety, 2021, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Frequent collaborators include Laura A. Magee, Marianne Vidler, Jeffrey N. Bone, Asma Khalil, and Hiten D. Mistry, with collaboration counts reflecting ongoing partnerships across various studies and publications.

Best Publications

  • Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Barbara Chmielewska;Imogen Barratt;Rosemary Townsend;Erkan Kalafat;Erkan Kalafat

  • Subclassification of Preeclampsia

    Peter von Dadelszen;Laura A. Magee;James M. Roberts

  • The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention.

    Liona C. Poon;Andrew Shennan;Jonathan A. Hyett;Anil Kapur

  • Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Executive Summary

    Laura A. Magee;Anouk Pels;Michael Helewa;Evelyne Rey

  • Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy

    Laura A. Magee;Peter von Dadelszen;Evelyne Rey;Susan Ross

  • Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model

    Peter von Dadelszen;Beth Payne;Jing Li;J Mark Ansermino

  • Hydralazine for treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy: meta-analysis

    Laura A Magee;Chris Cham;Elizabeth J Waterman;Arne Ohlsson

  • Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

    Laura A. Magee;Anouk Pels;Michael Helewa;Evelyne Rey

  • Change in the Incidence of Stillbirth and Preterm Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Asma Khalil;Peter von Dadelszen;Tim Draycott;Austin Ugwumadu

  • Redefining preeclampsia using placenta-derived biomarkers.

    Anne Cathrine Staff;Samantha J. Benton;Peter von Dadelszen;James M. Roberts

  • The Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: The 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertesion in Pregnancy Classification, Diagnosis & Management Recommendations for International Practice

    Laura A Magee;Mark A Brown;David R Hall;Sanjay Gupte

  • COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy: Coverage and Safety.

    Helena Blakeway;Smriti Prasad;Erkan Kalafat;Paul T. Heath

  • SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical features and pregnancy outcomes.

    Asma Khalil;Asma Khalil;Erkan Kalafat;Erkan Kalafat;Can Benlioglu;Pat O'Brien;Pat O'Brien

  • Measuring maternal health: focus on maternal morbidity

    Tabassum Firoz;Doris Chou;Peter von Dadelszen;Priya Agrawal

  • Therapy with both magnesium sulfate and nifedipine does not increase the risk of serious magnesium-related maternal side effects in women with preeclampsia.

    Laura A. Magee;Saman Miremadi;Jing Li;Carol Cheng

  • Diagnostic accuracy of urinary spot protein:creatinine ratio for proteinuria in hypertensive pregnant women: systematic review

    Anne-Marie Côté;Mark A Brown;Elaine Lam;Peter von Dadelszen

  • Gestational diabetes: opportunities for improving maternal and child health.

    Ponnusamy Saravanan;Ponnusamy Saravanan;Laura A Magee;Anita Banerjee;Matthew Anthony Coleman

  • DNA methylation profiling of human placentas reveals promoter hypomethylation of multiple genes in early-onset preeclampsia.

    Ryan K. C. Yuen;Maria S. Penaherrera;Peter Von Dadelszen;Deborah E. Mcfadden

  • The 24-hour urine collection: gold standard or historical practice?

    Anne-Marie Côté;Tabassum Firoz;André Mattman;Elaine M. Lam

  • Chorioamnionitis with a fetal inflammatory response is associated with higher neonatal mortality, morbidity, and resource use than chorioamnionitis displaying a maternal inflammatory response only

    Jacqueline Lau;Fergall Magee;Zhenguo Qiu;Jill Houbé

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura A. Magee
Laura A. Magee King's College London
Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Zulfiqar A Bhutta Aga Khan University
Asma Khalil
Asma Khalil St George's, University of London
Yuxiang Hu
Yuxiang Hu Materials Science & Engineering
Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University
Wendy P. Robinson
Wendy P. Robinson University of British Columbia
Lucilla Poston
Lucilla Poston King's College London
Louise C. Kenny
Louise C. Kenny University of Liverpool
Joel Singer
Joel Singer University of British Columbia
James M. Roberts
James M. Roberts University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens doors to dynamic careers, and online education options can streamline your journey. Many students begin their healthcare careers through nursing, taking advantage of flexible nursing degree online programs. These offer foundational medical knowledge while accommodating your schedule.

For registered nurses looking to advance, the rn to bsn cheapest programs help deepen skills and boost job prospects, often at a lower cost than traditional options. Ambitious nurses might consider advancing to becoming a nurse practitioner—affordable online fnp programs are widely available and provide specialized training for primary care roles.

If research or academic leadership is your goal, exploring online phd programs in nursing can open doors to higher education and research-focused positions. With these online pathways, you can start or accelerate your healthcare career while balancing personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter von Dadelszen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles