World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 102 7691 7230 295 281 383 36650

Janice J. Eng publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janice J. Eng between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janice J. Eng published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2021. 44 of the 437 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2021. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 27 publications
1989 2025

437 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janice J. Eng: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 3
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 8
2003 11
2004 22
2005 18
2006 12
2007 14
2008 15
2009 16
2010 20
2011 13
2012 18
2013 7
2014 25
2015 19
2016 21
2017 18
2018 12
2019 24
2020 18
2021 28
2022 19
2023 22
2024 17
2025 27
Total 437
Download as CSV

Janice J. Eng publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice J. Eng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 383 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 383
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Janice J. Eng D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice J. Eng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 102
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Janice J. Eng is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with a specific emphasis on Rehabilitation.

Their work spans multiple subfields within Medicine, including:

  • Rehabilitation
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Epidemiology
  • Neurology
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

The main topics covered in Janice J. Eng's research include:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

Janice J. Eng has published in several frequent venues, including:

  • Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • Physical Therapy
  • Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • Stroke

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Janice J. Eng include:

  • 'Higher Doses Improve Walking Recovery During Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation' (2020) published in Stroke
  • 'Capturing complex hand movements and object interactions using machine learning-powered stretchable smart textile gloves' (2024) published in Nature Machine Intelligence
  • 'Exoskeleton for post-stroke recovery of ambulation (ExStRA): study protocol for a mixed-methods study investigating the efficacy and acceptance of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program during stroke inpatient rehabilitation' (2020) published in BMC Neurology
  • 'Efficacy of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program for non-ambulatory patients during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial' (2021) published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • 'Challenges of Estimating Accurate Prevalence of Arm Weakness Early After Stroke' (2021) published in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

The scientist collaborates frequently with colleagues such as:

  • Mark Bayley
  • Jennifer Yao
  • Ada Tang
  • Chieh-ling Yang
  • W. Ben Mortenson

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Carolee J. Winstein;Joel Stein;Ross Arena;Barbara Bates

  • Physical Activity and Exercise Recommendations for Stroke Survivors A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Sandra A. Billinger;Ross A. Arena;Julie Bernhardt;Janice J. Eng

  • Kinetic analysis of the lower limbs during walking: what information can be gained from a three-dimensional model?

    Janice J. Eng;David A. Winter

  • The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review

    Lisa A. Simpson;Janice J. Eng;Jane T.C. Hsieh;Dalton L. Wolfe

  • Resistance and agility training reduce fall risk in women aged 75 to 85 with low bone mass: a 6-month randomized, controlled trial.

    Teresa Liu-Ambrose;Karim M Khan;Janice J Eng;Patti A Janssen

  • Relationship of balance and mobility to fall incidence in people with chronic stroke.

    Jocelyn E Harris;Janice J Eng;Daniel S Marigold;Craig D Tokuno

  • Strategies for recovery from a trip in early and late swing during human walking

    Janice J. Eng;David A. Winter;Aftab E. Patla

  • A systematic review of the management of autonomic dysreflexia after spinal cord injury.

    Andrei Krassioukov;Darren E. Warburton;Robert Teasell;Janice J. Eng

  • A community-based fitness and mobility exercise program for older adults with chronic stroke : a randomized, controlled trial

    Marco Yiu Chung Pang;Janice J. Eng;Andrew S. Dawson;Heather A. McKay

  • Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: A synthesis of the evidence

    Janice J Eng;Pei Fang Tang

  • The relationship of lower-extremity muscle torque to locomotor performance in people with stroke.

    C Maria Kim;Janice J Eng

  • Submaximal exercise in persons with stroke : test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with maximal oxygen consumption

    Janice J Eng;Janice J Eng;Andrew S Dawson;Kelly S Chu;Kelly S Chu

  • Symmetry in vertical ground reaction force is accompanied by symmetry in temporal but not distance variables of gait in persons with stroke.

    C.Maria Kim;Janice J Eng;Janice J Eng

  • Older Adults, Chronic Disease and Leisure-Time Physical Activity

    Maureen C. Ashe;William C. Miller;Janice J. Eng;Luc Noreau

  • Functional Walk Tests in Individuals With Stroke Relation to Perceived Exertion and Myocardial Exertion

    Janice J. Eng;Kelly S. Chu;Andrew S. Dawson;C.Maria Kim

  • Reliability and comparison of weight-bearing ability during standing tasks for individuals with chronic stroke

    Janice J. Eng;Kelly S. Chu

  • How active are people with stroke?: use of accelerometers to assess physical activity.

    Debbie Rand;Janice J. Eng;Pei-Fang Tang;Jiann-Shing Jeng

  • The use of aerobic exercise training in improving aerobic capacity in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis

    Marco Y. C. Pang;Janice J. Eng;Andrew S. Dawson;Sif Gylfadottir

  • Magnitude and pattern of 3D kinematic and kinetic gait profiles in persons with stroke: relationship to walking speed

    C.Maria Kim;C.Maria Kim;Janice J. Eng;Janice J. Eng

  • Evaluation of Soft Foot Orthotics in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

    Janice J Eng;Michael R Pierrynowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrei V. Krassioukov
Andrei V. Krassioukov University of British Columbia
Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Teresa Liu-Ambrose University of British Columbia
Robert Teasell
Robert Teasell University of Western Ontario
Heather A. McKay
Heather A. McKay University of British Columbia
Lara A. Boyd
Lara A. Boyd University of British Columbia
Karim M. Khan
Karim M. Khan University of British Columbia
Charles H. Goldsmith
Charles H. Goldsmith Simon Fraser University
Stephen R. Lord
Stephen R. Lord University of New South Wales
Julie Bernhardt
Julie Bernhardt Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Noah D. Silverberg
Noah D. Silverberg University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine does not always mean becoming a physician. There are a variety of rewarding paths in healthcare that can be started or advanced through flexible online degree options. Students seeking leadership roles in healthcare can benefit from the cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration, which offers the skills needed to manage hospitals or health organizations.

For nurses aiming to attain the highest level of clinical expertise, the cheapest dnp programs online make advanced education more accessible. Similarly, those interested in pharmacy can pursue a pharmacy degree online, enabling students to balance work and study while qualifying for in-demand roles in pharmaceuticals.

Technology and data are also vital in healthcare. Earning RHIA certification through rhia certification programs online opens pathways in health information management, an essential field for maintaining the integrity and privacy of patient records.

These online degrees offer flexibility, affordability, and diverse career opportunities beyond the traditional medical school route.

Best Scientists Citing Janice J. Eng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles