World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
33
Citations
3912
World Ranking
9455
National Ranking
2661

Mark Campbell publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Campbell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 107 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Mark Campbell D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Pseudo-LiDAR From Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving

    Yan Wang;Wei-Lun Chao;Divyansh Garg;Bharath Hariharan

  • (Open Access) Supercapacitor and supercapattery as emerging electrochemical energy stores

    Unknown

  • Autonomous driving in urban environments: approaches, lessons and challenges

    Mark E. Campbell;Magnus Egerstedt;Jonathan P. How;Richard M Murray

  • Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving

    Yurong You;Yan Wang;Wei-Lun Chao;Divyansh Garg

  • Single‐Atom Catalytic Materials for Advanced Battery Systems

    Unknown

  • Li7PS6 and Li6PS5X (X: Cl, Br, I): Possible Three‐dimensional Diffusion Pathways for Lithium Ions and Temperature Dependence of the Ionic Conductivity by�…

    Unknown

  • Team Cornell's Skynet: Robust perception and planning in an urban environment

    Isaac Miller;Mark Campbell;Dan Huttenlocher;Frank-Robert Kline

  • End-to-End Pseudo-LiDAR for Image-Based 3D Object Detection

    Rui Qian;Divyansh Garg;Yan Wang;Yurong You

  • Multiple agent-based autonomy for satellite constellations

    Thomas Schetter;Mark Campbell;Derek Surka

  • Train in Germany, Test in the USA: Making 3D Object Detectors Generalize

    Yan Wang;Xiangyu Chen;Yurong You;Li Erran Li

  • Anytime Stereo Image Depth Estimation on Mobile Devices

    Yan Wang;Zihang Lai;Gao Huang;Brian H. Wang

  • The MIT–Cornell collision and why it happened

    Luke Fletcher;Seth Teller;Edwin Olson;David Moore

  • Single-atom Catalytic Materials for Lean-electrolyte Ultrastable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

    Unknown

  • A nonlinear set-membership filter for on-line applications

    Eelco Scholte;Mark E. Campbell

  • Cooperative Tracking Using Vision Measurements on SeaScan UAVs

    M.E. Campbell;W.W. Whitacre

  • Joint transmit and reflective beamforming for IRS-assisted integrated sensing and communication

    Unknown

  • Contingency Planning Over Probabilistic Obstacle Predictions for Autonomous Road Vehicles

    Jason Hardy;Mark Campbell

  • A theoretical study of the lateral impact of fully clamped pipelines

    Unknown

  • Six-Axis Vibration Isolation System Using Soft Actuators and Multiple Sensors

    Doug Thayer;Mark Campbell;Juris Vagners;Andrew von Flotow

  • Planning Algorithm for Multiple Satellite Clusters

    Mark E. Campbell

  • Forest landscape restoration. Integrating natural and social sciences

    Unknown

  • A Tutorial on Environment-Aware Communications via Channel Knowledge Map for 6G

    Unknown

  • A D-shaped polymer optical fiber surface plasmon resonance biosensor for breast cancer detection applications

    Unknown

  • Identification of genes involved in regulatory mechanism of pigments in broiler chickens

    Unknown

  • ISAC meets SWIPT: Multi-functional wireless systems integrating sensing, communication, and powering

    Unknown

  • Optimal Coordinated Transmit Beamforming for Networked Integrated Sensing and Communications

    Unknown

  • Reverse osmosis pretreatment: Challenges with conventional treatment

    Unknown

  • Sensing with random signals

    Unknown

  • Understanding the electro-reduction of metal oxides in molten salts.

    Unknown

  • Mechanisms and designs of asymmetrical electrochemical capacitors

    Unknown

  • MIMO integrated sensing and communication: CRB-rate tradeoff

    Unknown

  • Comparative study of local and Karhunen–Lo�ve-based ST–T indexes in recordings from human subjects with induced myocardial ischemia

    Unknown

  • QRS detection and waveform boundary recognition using ecgpuwave

    Unknown

  • Meningeal carcinomatosis as the first manifestation of a transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Wei-Lun Chao
Wei-Lun Chao Boston University
Aidan Moran
Aidan Moran University College Dublin
Kilian Q. Weinberger
Kilian Q. Weinberger Cornell University
Matthew P. Herring
Matthew P. Herring University of Limerick
Bharath Hariharan
Bharath Hariharan Cornell University
Ephrahim Garcia
Ephrahim Garcia Cornell University
Mark Yim
Mark Yim University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related online degrees and career opportunities. Many students consider interdisciplinary programs that blend technical skills with business, legal, or communication expertise, enhancing their employability across industries.

For those interested in management, a cheapest online aacsb mba can be an affordable way to gain essential business leadership knowledge. This can complement your engineering background and prepare you for executive roles.

If legal and compliance issues appeal to you, exploring aba-approved online paralegal programs can help you work in patent law, contracts, or technology regulations.

Human capital is critical in tech organizations. A masters of human resources can open doors to strategic HR and talent management roles within tech-driven companies.

Finally, communication is key for successful engineers and technologists. An online master's in communication is ideal for those aiming to improve their ability to convey complex technical ideas. 

Best Scientists Citing Mark Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles