World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
5144
World Ranking
8388
National Ranking
3582

Russell L. Snyder publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell L. Snyder sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Russell L. Snyder D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell L. Snyder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Russell L. Snyder is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their academic career is connected primarily to this institution, indicating a focus likely aligned with its research environment and priorities.

No recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications have been documented for this researcher in the provided data. This absence of detailed publication information limits the ability to specify the exact research contributions or collaboration networks within their field.

Similarly, there is no available information regarding their main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work. The lack of such data suggests that either their research output has not been widely cataloged or the provided source data is incomplete concerning their specific research areas.

Russell L. Snyder has not been recorded as having received any awards, which indicates that no publicly noted honors have been attributed to their academic or scientific contributions based on the current dataset.

The available information confirms that Russell L. Snyder is currently living.

Best Publications

  • Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness.

    Patricia A. Leake;Gary T. Hradek;Russell L. Snyder

  • Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats.

    Patricia A Leake;Gary T Hradek;Stephen J Rebscher;Russell L Snyder

  • The topographic organization of corticocollicular projections from physiologically identified loci in the AI, AII, and anterior auditory cortical fields of the cat

    Richard A. Andersen;Russell L. Snyder;Michael M. Merzenich

  • Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation.

    Russell L Snyder;Stephen J Rebscher;Keli Cao;Patricia A Leake

  • A comparative study of the neurons of origin of the spinocerebellar afferents in the rat, Cat and squirrel monkey based on the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase

    Russell L. Snyder;Richard L. M. Faull;William R. Mehler

  • Auditory Prosthesis with a Penetrating Nerve Array

    John C. Middlebrooks;Russell L. Snyder;Russell L. Snyder

  • Topographic Spread of Inferior Colliculus Activation in Response to Acoustic and Intracochlear Electric Stimulation

    Russell L. Snyder;Julie A. Bierer;John C. Middlebrooks

  • Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity

    John C. Middlebrooks;Russell L. Snyder

  • Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation

    R. Snyder;P. Leake;S. Rebscher;R. Beitel

  • Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location.

    Patricia A. Leake;Russell L. Snyder;Gary T. Hradek;Stephen J. Rebscher

  • Spontaneous discharge patterns in cochlear spiral ganglion cells before the onset of hearing in cats.

    Timothy A Jones;Patricia A. Leake;Russell L Snyder;Olga Stakhovskaya

  • The auditory neurophonic: basic properties

    R.L. Snyder;C.E. Schreiner

  • Changes in the cat cochlear nucleus following neonatal deafening and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation

    Lawrence R. Lustig;Patricia A. Leake;Russell L. Snyder;Stephen J. Rebscher

  • Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II: Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus

    Russell L. Snyder;Stephen J. Rebscher;Patricia A. Leake;Kevin Kelly

  • Topographic organization of the central projections of the spiral ganglion in cats.

    Patricia A. Leake;Russell L. Snyder

  • Cochlear implants: the view from the brain

    John C Middlebrooks;Julie Arenberg Bierer;Russell L Snyder

  • Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats

    Patricia A. Leake;Russell L. Snyder;Gary T. Hradek;Stephen J. Rebscher

  • Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

    Russell L. Snyder;John C. Middlebrooks;Ben H. Bonham

  • Neonatal deafness results in degraded topographic specificity of auditory nerve projections to the cochlear nucleus in cats.

    Patricia A. Leake;Gary T. Hradek;Russell L. Snyder

  • Postnatal refinement of auditory nerve projections to the cochlear nucleus in cats.

    Patricia A. Leake;Russell L. Snyder;Gary T. Hradek

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia A. Leake
Patricia A. Leake University of California, San Francisco
John C. Middlebrooks
John C. Middlebrooks University of California, Irvine
Christoph E. Schreiner
Christoph E. Schreiner University of California, San Francisco
Michael M. Merzenich
Michael M. Merzenich University of California, San Francisco
Richard A. Andersen
Richard A. Andersen California Institute of Technology
Robert V. Shannon
Robert V. Shannon University of Southern California
Brian M. Johnstone
Brian M. Johnstone University of Western Australia
Bertrand Delgutte
Bertrand Delgutte Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Richard L.M. Faull
Richard L.M. Faull University of Auckland
David J. Anderson
David J. Anderson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Russell L. Snyder