World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
5809
World Ranking
9155
National Ranking
3864

Claus Peter Richter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus Peter Richter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 143 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Claus Peter Richter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus Peter Richter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claus Peter Richter is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, sensory systems, and surgery.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics, with a strong focus on hearing loss and rehabilitation, cochlear function, and related genetic factors. Other areas of interest include neuroscience and neural engineering, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, ear surgery and otitis media, healthcare technology and patient monitoring, as well as connective tissue disorders.

Richter has published in numerous venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
  • Bioactive Materials
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent co-authors in Richter's publications include Xiaodong Tan, Joaquín Cury, Alessandra Carriero, Donna S. Whitlon, and Aditi Agarwal. Collaboration with these researchers reflects a sustained engagement in multidisciplinary and cooperative studies.

Selected recent papers by Claus Peter Richter include:

  • CAMSAP3 facilitates basal body polarity and the formation of the central pair of microtubules in motile cilia, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Enhancing biocompatibility of the brain-machine interface: A review, 2024, Bioactive Materials
  • Increased cochlear otic capsule thickness and intracortical canal porosity in the oim mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta, 2021, Journal of Structural Biology
  • Statins protect mice from high-decibel noise-induced hearing loss, 2023, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
  • Infrared neural stimulation at different wavelengths and pulse shapes, 2020, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology

Best Publications

  • Infrared light excites cells by changing their electrical capacitance

    Mikhail G. Shapiro;Kazuaki Homma;Sebastian Villarreal;Claus Peter Richter

  • Hyperelastic “bone”: A highly versatile, growth factor–free, osteoregenerative, scalable, and surgically friendly biomaterial

    Adam E. Jakus;Alexandra L. Rutz;Sumanas W. Jordan;Abhishek Kannan

  • Laser stimulation of the auditory nerve

    Agnella D. Izzo;Claus Peter Richter;Claus Peter Richter;E. Duco Jansen;Joseph T. Walsh

  • Optical Parameter Variability in Laser Nerve Stimulation: A Study of Pulse Duration, Repetition Rate, and Wavelength

    A.D. Izzo;J.T. Walsh;E.D. Jansen;M. Bendett

  • Laser Stimulation of Auditory Neurons: Effect of Shorter Pulse Duration and Penetration Depth

    Agnella D. Izzo;Joseph T. Walsh;Heather Ralph;Jim Webb

  • Neural stimulation with optical radiation.

    CP Richter;AI Matic;JD Wells;ED Jansen

  • Apparatus and methods for optical stimulation of the auditory nerve

    Joseph T. Walsh;E. Duco Jansen;Agnella Izzo;Claus-Peter Richter

  • Stiffness of the gerbil basilar membrane: radial and longitudinal variations.

    Gulam Emadi;Claus Peter Richter;Peter Dallos

  • Optical stimulation of auditory neurons: effects of acute and chronic deafening.

    Claus Peter Richter;Rodrigo Bayon;Agnella D. Izzo;Margarete Otting

  • Morphology of the unfixed cochlea.

    R.M Edge;B.N Evans;M Pearce;C.-P Richter

  • Selectivity of neural stimulation in the auditory system: a comparison of optic and electric stimuli.

    Agnella D. Izzo;Eul Suh;Jyoti Pathria;Joseph T. Walsh

  • Optical Stimulation of the Facial Nerve: A New Monitoring Technique?

    Ingo Ulrik Teudt;Adam E. Nevel;Agnella D. Izzo;Joseph T. Walsh

  • Tectorial Membrane Stiffness Gradients

    Claus Peter Richter;Gulam Emadi;Geoffrey Getnick;Alicia Quesnel

  • Spread of cochlear excitation during stimulation with pulsed infrared radiation: inferior colliculus measurements

    Claus-Peter Richter;S. M. Rajguru;A. I. Matic;E. L. Moreno

  • Optical cochlear implants: evaluation of surgical approach and laser parameters in cats.

    Suhrud M. Rajguru;Agnella Izzo Matic;Alan M. Robinson;Andrew J. Fishman

  • Infrared photostimulation of the crista ampullaris

    Suhrud M. Rajguru;Claus Peter Richter;Agnella I. Matic

  • Evaluation of Electroencephalography Source Localization Algorithms with Multiple Cortical Sources

    Allison Bradley;Jun Yao;Jules Dewald;Claus Peter Richter

  • Acoustic Events and “Optophonic” Cochlear Responses Induced by Pulsed Near-Infrared LASER

    Ingo Ulrik Teudt;Hannes Maier;Claus-Peter Richter;Andrej Kral

  • Roles of the espin actin-bundling proteins in the morphogenesis and stabilization of hair cell stereocilia revealed in CBA/CaJ congenic jerker mice.

    Gabriella Sekerková;Claus Peter Richter;James R. Bartles

  • Photons and neurons.

    Claus Peter Richter;Xiaodong Tan

Frequent Co-Authors

Rainer Klinke
Rainer Klinke Goethe University Frankfurt
Ian K. Robinson
Ian K. Robinson University College London
Peter Dallos
Peter Dallos Northwestern University
Francisco Bezanilla
Francisco Bezanilla University of Chicago
Tai-Chang Chiang
Tai-Chang Chiang University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paul V. Braun
Paul V. Braun University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Xinge Yu
Xinge Yu City University of Hong Kong
Stephen M. Highstein
Stephen M. Highstein Marine Biological Laboratory
Robert C. Kern
Robert C. Kern Northwestern University
Andreas Mandelis
Andreas Mandelis University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Claus Peter Richter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles