World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Astrid Van Wieringen

Astrid Van Wieringen

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
7554
World Ranking
5814
National Ranking
73

Astrid Van Wieringen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Astrid Van Wieringen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 314 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Astrid Van Wieringen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Astrid Van Wieringen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Astrid Van Wieringen is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Health Professions, with a significant focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Sensory Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Signal Processing.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics, including:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Ear Surgery and Otitis Media

Van Wieringen has published numerous papers, some of the recent ones being:

  • "The digit triplet test: a scoping review," 2021, International Journal of Audiology
  • "Brain mapping of auditory steady-state responses: A broad view of cortical and subcortical sources," 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • "Longitudinal auditory data of children with prelingual single-sided deafness managed with early cochlear implantation," 2022, Scientific Reports
  • "Assessment of Receptive and Expressive Language Skills Among Young Children With Prelingual Single-Sided Deafness Managed With Early Cochlear Implantation," 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • "Stimulus-evoked phase-locked activity along the human auditory pathway strongly varies across individuals," 2021, Scientific Reports

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Van Wieringen include:

  • Jan Wouters
  • Mira Van Wilderode
  • Tine Arras
  • Nathan Van Humbeeck
  • Ralf Krampe

They have contributed extensively to high-impact publication venues such as:

  • Ear and Hearing
  • International Journal of Audiology
  • Trends in Hearing
  • Scientific Reports
  • Hearing Research

Best Publications

  • Predictors of spoken language development following pediatric cochlear implantation.

    Tinne Boons;Jan P. L. Brokx;Ingeborg Dhooge;Johan H. M. Frijns

  • APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments

    Tom Francart;Astrid van Wieringen;Jan Wouters

  • Auditory processing, speech perception and phonological ability in pre-school children at high-risk for dyslexia: A longitudinal study of the auditory temporal processing theory

    Bart Boets;Jan Wouters;Astrid van Wieringen;Pol Ghesquière

  • LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands

    Astrid van Wieringen;Jan Wouters

  • Expressive Vocabulary, Morphology, Syntax and Narrative Skills in Profoundly Deaf Children after Early Cochlear Implantation

    Tinne Boons;Leo De Raeve;Margreet Langereis;Louis Peeraer

  • Modelling Relations between Sensory Processing, Speech Perception, Orthographic and Phonological Ability, and Literacy Achievement.

    Bart Boets;Jan Wouters;Astrid van Wieringen;Bert De Smedt

  • Effect of pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation on language development

    Tinne Boons;Jan P. L. Brokx;Johan H. M. Frijns;Louis Peeraer

  • Psychophysical evidence for a general temporal processing deficit in children with dyslexia.

    Mieke Van Ingelghem;Astrid Van Wieringen;Jan Wouters;Erik Vandenbussche

  • Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study

    Sofie Jansen;Heleen Luts;Kirsten Carola Wagener;Birger Kollmeier

  • Sound Localization, Sound Lateralization, and Binaural Masking Level Differences in Young Children with Normal Hearing.

    Lieselot Van Deun;Astrid van Wieringen;Tim Van den Bogaert;Fanny Scherf

  • Unilateral congenital hearing loss in children: Challenges and potentials.

    Astrid van Wieringen;An Boudewyns;Anouk Sangen;Jan Wouters

  • Hearing disability measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale in clinically normal-hearing and hearing-impaired middle-aged persons, and disability screening by means of a reduced SSQ (the SSQ5).

    Kelly Demeester;Vedat Topsakal;Jan-Jaap Hendrickx;Erik Fransen

  • Auditory Temporal Information Processing in Preschool Children at Family Risk for Dyslexia: Relations with Phonological Abilities and Developing Literacy Skills.

    Bart Boets;Jan Wouters;Astrid van Wieringen;Pol Ghesquière

  • Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.

    Lieselot Van Deun;Astrid van Wieringen;Jan Wouters

  • Asymmetric Pulses in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Pulse Shape, Polarity, and Rate

    Olivier Macherey;Astrid van Wieringen;Robert P. Carlyon;John M. Deeks

  • Earlier intervention leads to better sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants

    Lieselot Van Deun;Astrid van Wieringen;Fanny Scherf;Naima Deggouj

  • Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents

    Olivier Macherey;Olivier Macherey;Robert P. Carlyon;Astrid van Wieringen;John M. Deeks

  • Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.

    Tine Goossens;Charlotte Vercammen;Jan Wouters;Astrid van Wieringen

  • Speech perception in preschoolers at family risk for dyslexia: relations with low-level auditory processing and phonological ability.

    Bart Boets;Pol Ghesquière;Astrid van Wieringen;Jan Wouters

  • Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing.

    Robert P. Carlyon;Astrid van Wieringen;Christopher J. Long;John M. Deeks

  • Aging Affects Neural Synchronization to Speech-Related Acoustic Modulations.

    Tine Goossens;Charlotte Vercammen;Jan Wouters;Astrid van Wieringen

  • Auditory Environment Across the Life Span of Cochlear Implant Users: Insights From Data Logging

    Tobias Busch;Tobias Busch;Filiep Vanpoucke;Astrid van Wieringen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Wouters
Jan Wouters KU Leuven
Paul Van de Heyning
Paul Van de Heyning University of Antwerp
Robert P. Carlyon
Robert P. Carlyon University of Cambridge
Marc Moonen
Marc Moonen KU Leuven
Bart Boets
Bart Boets KU Leuven
Vincent Thijs
Vincent Thijs Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Simon Doclo
Simon Doclo Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, a range of related online degrees can help broaden your career opportunities. Many choose to complement neuroscience with further study in counseling, psychology, or marriage and family therapy—fields often interconnected in both research and clinical practice.

If you're looking for cost-effective options, several cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online can prepare you for professional counseling careers with recognized credentials. Those interested in mental health might also consider affordable online masters counseling programs, which offer flexible study while fulfilling licensure requirements.

For a focus on family dynamics and therapy, an lmft degree (Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist) is a valuable option—especially for those interested in the neurological aspects of relationships. Similarly, an affordable online masters in clinical psychology can further your practical skills for roles in clinical, academic, or research settings.

Exploring these pathways alongside neuroscience can open doors to diverse roles in healthcare, research, and therapy, while allowing for flexible, affordable online study.

Best Scientists Citing Astrid Van Wieringen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles