World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul Van de Heyning

Paul Van de Heyning

Award Badge
Neuroscience
Belgium
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
34615
World Ranking
9282
National Ranking
104

Neuroscience

D-Index
96
Citations
32803
World Ranking
862
National Ranking
6

Paul Van de Heyning publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Van de Heyning sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 500 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul Van de Heyning D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Van de Heyning sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Belgium Leader Award

Overview

Paul Van de Heyning is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, neurology, otorhinolaryngology, and speech and hearing.

Their work covers several key topics within the field, including:

  • Hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics
  • Hearing loss and rehabilitation
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Ear surgery and otitis media
  • Noise effects and management
  • Obstructive sleep apnea research
  • Hearing impairment and communication

Van de Heyning has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
  • Otology & Neurotology
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Ear and Hearing
  • B-ENT

Selected recent research papers authored or co-authored by Van de Heyning include:

  • "Unilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe, Profound, or Moderate Sloping to Profound Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss," 2020, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
  • "Endotypic Mechanisms of Successful Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea," 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • "Cognitive Improvement After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults With Severe or Profound Hearing Impairment: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Controlled, Multicenter Study," 2020, Ear and Hearing
  • "Consensus Statement on Bone Conduction Devices and Active Middle Ear Implants in Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss," 2022, Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
  • "The smaller the frequency-to-place mismatch the better the hearing outcomes in cochlear implant recipients?," 2021, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Van de Heyning collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Vincent Van Rompaey
  • Griet Mertens
  • Vedat Topsakal
  • Olivier M. Vanderveken
  • Annick Gilles

Best Publications

  • A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS).

    Philippe H. Dejonckere;Patrick Bradley;Pais Clemente;Guy Cornut

  • The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach

    Floris L. Wuyts;Marc S. De Bodt;Geert Molenberghs;Marc Remacle

  • Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients

    Peter Blamey;Françoise Artieres;Deniz Başkent;François Bergeron

  • GJB2 mutations and degree of hearing loss: a multicenter study.

    Rikkert L. Snoeckx;Patrick L M Huygen;Delphine Feldmann;Sandrine Marlin

  • Upper-Airway Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

    Patrick J. Strollo;Ryan J. Soose;Joachim T. Maurer;Nico de Vries

  • Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: Influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality

    Marc S. De Bodt;Marc S. De Bodt;Floris L. Wuyts;Paul H. Van de Heyning;Christophe Croux;Christophe Croux

  • Body surface area in normal-weight, overweight, and obese adults. A comparison study

    Johan Verbraecken;Johan Verbraecken;Paul Van de Heyning;Wilfried De Backer;Luc Van Gaal

  • Incapacitating Unilateral Tinnitus in Single-Sided Deafness Treated by Cochlear Implantation

    Paul Van de Heyning;Katrien Vermeire;Martina Diebl;Peter Nopp

  • Pre-, Per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time

    Diane S. Lazard;Christophe Vincent;Frédéric Venail;Paul Van de Heyning

  • Mutations in the human |[alpha]|-tectorin gene cause autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing impairment

    Kristien Verhoeven;Lut Van Laer;Karin Kirschhofer;P Kevin Legan

  • The neural correlates of tinnitus-related distress

    Sven Vanneste;Mark Plazier;Elsa van der Loo;Paul Van de Heyning

  • Nonsyndromic hearing impairment is associated with a mutation in DFNA5

    Lut Van Laer;Egbert H Huizing;Margriet Verstreken;Diederick van Zuijlen

  • Consensus for tinnitus patient assessment and treatment outcome measurement: Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting, Regensburg, July 2006.

    B. Langguth;R. Goodey;A. Azevedo;A. Bjorne

  • Therapeutic electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve in obstructive sleep apnea

    Alan R. Schwartz;Alan R. Schwartz;Marc L. Bennett;Philip L. Smith;Philip L. Smith;Wilfried De Backer;Wilfried De Backer

  • Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus.

    Katrien Vermeire;Paul Van de Heyning

  • Occupational noise, smoking, and a high body mass index are risk factors for age-related hearing impairment and moderate alcohol consumption is protective: a European population-based multicenter study.

    Erik Fransen;Vedat Topsakal;Jan Jaap Hendrickx;Lut Van Laer

  • Evaluation of drug-induced sleep endoscopy as a patient selection tool for implanted upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea.

    Olivier M. Vanderveken;Joachim T. Maurer;Winfried Hohenhorst;Evert Hamans

  • Visualizing Out-of-Body Experience in the Brain

    Dirk De Ridder;Koen Van Laere;Patrick Dupont;Tomas Menovsky

  • Comparison of a Custom-made and a Thermoplastic Oral Appliance for the Treatment of Mild Sleep Apnea

    Olivier M. Vanderveken;Annick Devolder;Marie Marklund;An N. Boudewyns

  • Impacts of unit-level nurse practice environment and burnout on nurse-reported outcomes: a multilevel modelling approach

    Peter Van Bogaert;Sean Clarke;Ella Roelant;Herman Meulemans

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder University of Otago
Sven Vanneste
Sven Vanneste Trinity College Dublin
Guy Van Camp
Guy Van Camp University of Antwerp
Erik Fransen
Erik Fransen University of Antwerp
Lut Van Laer
Lut Van Laer University of Antwerp
Paul M. Parizel
Paul M. Parizel University of Western Australia
Richard J.H. Smith
Richard J.H. Smith University of Iowa
Aage R. Møller
Aage R. Møller The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and flexible career pathways. Students frequently consider complementary programs that can deepen their knowledge or diversify their expertise, all while studying remotely.

For those interested in behavior and mental processes, an online degree psychology program is a popular and affordable route. These degrees provide foundational knowledge applicable to Neuroscience practice and research. If you are passionate about social work and its neurological impacts, consider exploring msw degree programs, which are designed for those seeking to help individuals in clinical or community settings.

Aspiring clinical practitioners often look into advanced options like psyd programs usa, which emphasize the clinical application of psychological science, or lmft online programs for those wanting to specialize in marriage and family therapy. Each of these degrees offers unique career routes closely connected to neuroscience, mental health, and human well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Van de Heyning

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles