World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cor W. R. J. Cremers

Cor W. R. J. Cremers

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16674 15687 632 610 422 23538

Cor W. R. J. Cremers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cor W. R. J. Cremers between 1976 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cor W. R. J. Cremers published across 46 years, from 1976 to 2021, averaging 10.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2002. 3 of the 492 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2002. 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 22 publications 1996: 20 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 19 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 31 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications
1976 2021

492 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cor W. R. J. Cremers: publications per year, 1976 to 2021
Year Publications
1976 2
1977 3
1978 1
1979 4
1980 3
1981 5
1982 3
1983 3
1984 5
1985 7
1986 2
1987 2
1988 4
1989 3
1990 3
1991 10
1992 6
1993 5
1994 16
1995 22
1996 20
1997 10
1998 14
1999 19
2000 18
2001 15
2002 31
2003 21
2004 20
2005 20
2006 22
2007 19
2008 26
2009 27
2010 16
2011 29
2012 16
2013 10
2014 2
2015 9
2016 7
2017 4
2018 2
2019 3
2020 1
2021 2
Total 492
Download as CSV

Cor W. R. J. Cremers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cor W. R. J. Cremers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 422 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 422
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Cor W. R. J. Cremers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cor W. R. J. Cremers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cor W. R. J. Cremers is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and specializes in research spanning neuroscience, medicine, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work intersects with subfields including cognitive neuroscience, otorhinolaryngology, sensory systems, molecular biology, and neurology.

The scientist's research focuses on topics such as hearing loss and rehabilitation, ear surgery and otitis media, hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, facial nerve paralysis treatment and research, RNA regulation and disease, as well as RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms.

Recent publications by Cremers include:

  • Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review, 2020, Clinical Otolaryngology
  • Sound localization with bilateral bone conduction devices, 2021, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
  • A RIPOR2 in-frame deletion is a frequent and highly penetrant cause of adult-onset hearing loss, 2020, Journal of Medical Genetics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cremers include:

  • Helén Lagerkvist
  • Kárin Santana de Carvalho
  • Marcus Holmberg
  • Ulrika Petersson
  • Malou Hultcrantz

Their published work often appears in venues such as:

  • Clinical Otolaryngology
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
  • Journal of Medical Genetics

Best Publications

  • SDH5, a Gene Required for Flavination of Succinate Dehydrogenase, Is Mutated in Paraganglioma

    Huai Xiang Hao;Oleh Khalimonchuk;Margit Schraders;Noah Dephoure

  • Mutations in the gene encoding B1 subunit of H+-ATPase cause renal tubular acidosis with sensorineural deafness

    FE Karet;KE Finberg;RD Nelson;A Nayir

  • GJB2 mutations and degree of hearing loss: a multicenter study.

    Rikkert L. Snoeckx;Patrick L M Huygen;Delphine Feldmann;Sandrine Marlin

  • Mutation of a gene encoding a protein with extracellular matrix motifs in Usher syndrome type IIa

    James D. Eudy;Michael D. Weston;Su Fang Yao;Denise M. Hoover

  • Heterozygous mutations in the gene encoding noggin affect human joint morphogenesis.

    Yaoqin Gong;Deborah Krakow;Deborah Krakow;Jose Marcelino;Douglas Wilkin

  • Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present?

    Ad F. M. Snik;Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus;David W. Proops;John F. Wolfaardt

  • Occupational noise, smoking, and a high body mass index are risk factors for age-related hearing impairment and moderate alcohol consumption is protective: a European population-based multicenter study.

    Erik Fransen;Vedat Topsakal;Jan Jaap Hendrickx;Lut Van Laer

  • Mutations in the Wolfram syndrome 1 gene (WFS1) are a common cause of low frequency sensorineural hearing loss

    Irina N. Bespalova;Irina N. Bespalova;Guy Van Camp;Steven J.H. Bom;David J. Brown

  • SDHAF2 mutations in familial and sporadic paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma

    Jean Pierre Bayley;Henricus P.M. Kunst;Alberto Cascon;Maria Lourdes Sampietro

  • Mutations in COL11A2 cause non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNA13).

    W. T. Mcguirt;S. D. Prasad;A. J. Griffith;H. P. M. Kunst

  • Identification of 51 Novel Exons of the Usher Syndrome Type 2A (USH2A) Gene That Encode Multiple Conserved Functional Domains and That Are Mutated in Patients with Usher Syndrome Type II

    Erwin van Wijk;Ronald J.E. Pennings;Heleen te Brinke;Annemarie Claassen

  • CDH23 Mutation and Phenotype Heterogeneity: A Profile of 107 Diverse Families with Usher Syndrome and Nonsyndromic Deafness

    L.M. Astuto;J.M. Bork;M.D. Weston;J.W. Askew

  • The DFNB31 gene product whirlin connects to the Usher protein network in the cochlea and retina by direct association with USH2A and VLGR1

    Erwin van Wijk;Bert van der Zwaag;Theo Peters;Ulrike Zimmermann

  • GRM7 variants confer susceptibility to age-related hearing impairment

    Rick A. Friedman;Lut Van Laer;Matthew J. Huentelman;Sonal S. Sheth

  • Mutations in different components of FGF signaling in LADD syndrome

    E. Rohmann;H.G. Brunner;H. Kayserili;O. Uyguner

  • Phenotypic manifestations of branchiootorenal syndrome

    Achih Chen;Mary Francis;Li Ni;Cor W. R. J. Cremers

  • Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements.

    Myrthe K. S. Hol;Arjan J. Bosman;Ad F. M. Snik;Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus

  • Mutational spectrum of the WFS1 gene in Wolfram syndrome, nonsyndromic hearing impairment, diabetes mellitus, and psychiatric disease.

    Kim Cryns;Theru A. Sivakumaran;Jody M.W. Van den Ouweland;Ronald J.E. Pennings

  • Genomic structure and identification of novel mutations in Usherin, the gene responsible for Usher syndrome type IIa.

    M. D. Weston;J. D. Eudy;S. Fujita;S.-F. Yao

  • Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival.

    Catharina A. J. Dun;Hubert T. Faber;Maarten J. F. de Wolf;Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus

Frequent Co-Authors

Hannie Kremer
Hannie Kremer Radboud University
William J. Kimberling
William J. Kimberling University of Iowa
Frans P.M. Cremers
Frans P.M. Cremers Radboud University
Guy Van Camp
Guy Van Camp University of Antwerp
Lies H. Hoefsloot
Lies H. Hoefsloot Erasmus University Rotterdam
Han G. Brunner
Han G. Brunner Radboud University
Rob W.J. Collin
Rob W.J. Collin Radboud University
Richard J.H. Smith
Richard J.H. Smith University of Iowa
Paul Van de Heyning
Paul Van de Heyning University of Antwerp
Erik Fransen
Erik Fransen University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers beyond becoming a physician. Many students interested in healthcare choose alternative online degree pathways that lead to high-demand roles across hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

For those seeking leadership positions in healthcare settings, a degree in healthcare administration offers fast-track online options emphasizing management, policy, and operational skills. Registered nurses can further their impact by enrolling in adn to msn bridge programs, which streamline academic progression into advanced clinical or leadership roles.

Nutrition and wellness are also key components of healthcare today. The best online nutrition degree programs prepare students for careers as nutritionists, educators, or health consultants, combining scientific foundations with flexible e-learning formats.

Additionally, those pursuing executive roles may consider accredited mha programs online. These degrees are recognized for meeting high standards in healthcare administration education and can advance your career opportunities in management. Online pathways make it possible to balance work, academic goals, and personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Cor W. R. J. Cremers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles