World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
Belgium
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10563 9917 121 116 473 29308
Genetics 94 938 884 10 10 371 28225

Guy Van Camp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guy Van Camp between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guy Van Camp published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 17.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 103 publications in 2023. 54 of the 666 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 103. Peak 103 publications in 2023. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 8 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 24 publications 1999: 25 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 103 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 22 publications
1988 2025

666 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guy Van Camp: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 3
1992 1
1993 8
1994 6
1995 8
1996 11
1997 20
1998 24
1999 25
2000 14
2001 15
2002 19
2003 23
2004 13
2005 19
2006 14
2007 20
2008 14
2009 23
2010 17
2011 24
2012 18
2013 15
2014 28
2015 12
2016 16
2017 17
2018 18
2019 11
2020 12
2021 23
2022 11
2023 103
2024 32
2025 22
Total 666
Download as CSV

Guy Van Camp publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Van Camp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 365–374 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 371 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47 371
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Guy Van Camp D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Van Camp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70 94
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Genetics in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in Belgium Leader Award

Overview

Guy Van Camp is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium and has contributed extensively to research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields, most notably Molecular Biology, Oncology, Sensory Systems, Cancer Research, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics, with significant publications addressing Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, and Genetics; Epigenetics and DNA Methylation; Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics; RNA modifications and cancer; Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies; Vestibular and auditory disorders; and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation.

Among the recent papers produced by Guy Van Camp are the following:

  • Punching Holes in Cellular Membranes: Biology and Evolution of Gasdermins, 2021, Trends in Cell Biology
  • GSDME and its role in cancer: From behind the scenes to the front of the stage, 2020, International Journal of Cancer
  • Methylation biomarkers for early cancer detection and diagnosis: Current and future perspectives, 2022, European Journal of Cancer
  • DNA Methylation as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Malignant Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2021, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Disease-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines improve sequence variant interpretation for hearing loss, 2021, Genetics in Medicine

Guy Van Camp frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Ken Op de Beeck
  • Marc Peeters
  • Erik Fransén
  • Joe Ibrahim
  • Vincent Van Rompaey

Major publication venues for Guy Van Camp include:

  • Otology & Neurotology
  • Molecular Oncology
  • Clinical Epigenetics
  • ESMO Open
  • Genes

Best Publications

  • GJB2 mutations and degree of hearing loss: a multicenter study.

    Rikkert L. Snoeckx;Patrick L M Huygen;Delphine Feldmann;Sandrine Marlin

  • Forty-six genes causing nonsyndromic hearing impairment: which ones should be analyzed in DNA diagnostics?

    Nele Hilgert;Richard J.H. Smith;Guy Van Camp

  • Nano-targeted induction of dual ferroptotic mechanisms eradicates high-risk neuroblastoma

    Behrouz Hassannia;Bartosz Wiernicki;Irina Ingold;Feng Qu

  • Congenital hearing loss.

    Anna M.H. Korver;Richard J.H. Smith;Guy Van Camp;Mark R. Schleiss

  • NONSYNDROMIC HEARING IMPAIRMENT: UNPARALLELED HETEROGENEITY

    G. Van Camp;P. J. Willems;R. J. H. Smith

  • Mutations in the human |[alpha]|-tectorin gene cause autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing impairment

    Kristien Verhoeven;Lut Van Laer;Karin Kirschhofer;P Kevin Legan

  • A novel deletion involving the connexin-30 gene, del(GJB6-d13s1854), found in trans with mutations in the GJB2 gene (connexin-26) in subjects with DFNB1 non-syndromic hearing impairment

    F. J. Del Castillo;M. Rodriguez-Ballesteros;A. Alvarez;T. Hutchin

  • Nonsyndromic hearing impairment is associated with a mutation in DFNA5

    Lut Van Laer;Egbert H Huizing;Margriet Verstreken;Diederick van Zuijlen

  • Mutations in the gene encoding pejvakin, a newly identified protein of the afferent auditory pathway, cause DFNB59 auditory neuropathy

    Sedigheh Delmaghani;Francisco J del Castillo;Vincent Michel;Michel Leibovici

  • Non-syndromic hearing loss associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct is caused by PDS mutations

    Shin Ichi Usami;Satoko Abe;Mike D. Weston;Hideichi Shinkawa

  • Prevalence and Evolutionary Origins of the del(GJB6-D13S1830) Mutation in the DFNB1 Locus in Hearing-Impaired Subjects: a Multicenter Study

    Ignacio Del Castillo;Miguel A. Moreno-Pelayo;Francisco J. Del Castillo;Zippora Brownstein

  • The Complexity of Age-Related Hearing Impairment: Contributing Environmental and Genetic Factors

    E. Van Eyken;G. Van Camp;L. Van Laer

  • Occupational noise, smoking, and a high body mass index are risk factors for age-related hearing impairment and moderate alcohol consumption is protective: a European population-based multicenter study.

    Erik Fransen;Vedat Topsakal;Jan Jaap Hendrickx;Lut Van Laer

  • Mutations in the novel protocadherin PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F

    Kumar N. Alagramam;Huijun Yuan;Markus H. Kuehn;Crystal L. Murcia

  • Mutations in the Wolfram syndrome 1 gene (WFS1) are a common cause of low frequency sensorineural hearing loss

    Irina N. Bespalova;Irina N. Bespalova;Guy Van Camp;Steven J.H. Bom;David J. Brown

  • Mutations in COL11A2 cause non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNA13).

    W. T. Mcguirt;S. D. Prasad;A. J. Griffith;H. P. M. Kunst

  • Identification of mutations in the connexin 26 gene that cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss

    D. A. Scott;M. L. Kraft;R. Carmi;A. Ramesh

  • Mutations in the transcriptional activator EYA4 cause late-onset deafness at the DFNA10 locus

    Sigrid Wayne;Nahid G. Robertson;Frank DeClau;Nancy Chen

  • A genotype-phenotype correlation for GJB2 (connexin 26) deafness.

    K Cryns;E Orzan;A Murgia;P L M Huygen

  • The hereditary hearing loss homepage

    G. Van Camp;R.J.H. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Lut Van Laer
Lut Van Laer University of Antwerp
Erik Fransen
Erik Fransen University of Antwerp
Richard J.H. Smith
Richard J.H. Smith University of Iowa
Paul Van de Heyning
Paul Van de Heyning University of Antwerp
Cor W. R. J. Cremers
Cor W. R. J. Cremers Radboud University
Marc Peeters
Marc Peeters University of Antwerp
Wim Vanden Berghe
Wim Vanden Berghe University of Antwerp
Patrick Pauwels
Patrick Pauwels University of Antwerp
Hannie Kremer
Hannie Kremer Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in genetics, there are closely related fields and flexible education pathways that can complement your studies, or offer alternative careers in healthcare. One popular path is earning a medical billing and coding certification. This credential can provide quick entry into healthcare administration and support services—even for those without a science degree.

If you prefer working directly with patients, exploring easy to get into nursing programs can be a smart move. These programs often have lower barriers to entry and can lead to fulfilling, in-demand nursing careers.

Leadership and organizational roles are also accessible, with the option to pursue a healthcare administration online degree. Many universities offer accelerated courses, letting you earn your degree quickly and conveniently.

Cost is also an important factor. For students seeking affordable options, consider finding the cheapest online healthcare administration degree to minimize student debt and maximize career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Guy Van Camp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles