World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 17770 16700 272 260 593 78794

Bernard Waeber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bernard Waeber between 1978 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bernard Waeber published across 44 years, from 1978 to 2021, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 1987. 1 of the 599 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 1987. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 8 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 12 publications 1984: 17 publications 1985: 19 publications 1986: 30 publications 1987: 37 publications 1988: 26 publications 1989: 19 publications 1990: 18 publications 1991: 18 publications 1992: 20 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 22 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1978 2021

599 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bernard Waeber: publications per year, 1978 to 2021
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 7
1980 3
1981 8
1982 6
1983 12
1984 17
1985 19
1986 30
1987 37
1988 26
1989 19
1990 18
1991 18
1992 20
1993 18
1994 15
1995 22
1996 15
1997 9
1998 6
1999 11
2000 6
2001 15
2002 9
2003 11
2004 10
2005 16
2006 14
2007 15
2008 28
2009 19
2010 17
2011 17
2012 16
2013 22
2014 20
2015 13
2016 4
2017 2
2018 4
2019 2
2020 0
2021 1
Total 599
Download as CSV

Bernard Waeber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Waeber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 593 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 593
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bernard Waeber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Waeber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bernard Waeber is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, especially within the subfields of infectious diseases and neurology. The scientist's work has addressed topics related to COVID-19 clinical research studies, the long-term effects of COVID-19, and broader SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research.

Their recent publications include the following papers, all published in 2021 in the journal Praxis:

  • CME: L'hypertension artérielle et la pandémie COVID-19: Ce qu'il faut retenir en pratique médicale (2021, Praxis)
  • CME: Hypertonie und die COVID-19-Pandemie: Was in der medizinischen Praxis zu beachten ist (2021, Praxis)
  • CME/Antworten: Hypertonie und die COVID-19-Pandemie: Was in der medizinischen Praxis zu beachten ist (2021, Praxis)
  • CME/Réponses: L'hypertension artérielle et la pandémie COVID-19: Ce qu'il faut retenir en pratique médicale (2021, Praxis)

In collaboration, Bernard Waeber frequently coauthors works with Grégoire Wuerzner, with whom they share authorship on multiple papers.

Their contributions to the scientific literature are predominantly featured in the journal Praxis, evidencing a focused publication pattern within this venue.

  • Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Neurology

  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redon

  • 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redon

  • 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

    Giuseppe Mancia;Guy De Backer;Anna Dominiczak;Renata Cifkova

  • European Society of Hypertension Position Paper on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Eoin O’Brien;Gianfranco Parati;George Stergiou;Roland Asmar

  • European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

    Gianfranco Parati;George S. Stergiou;Eoin O'Brien;Roland P Asmar

  • 2013 ESH/ESC Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redon

  • European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.

    Gianfranco Parati;George S. Stergiou;Roland Asmar;Grzegorz Bilo

  • Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults

    Eoin O'Brien;Eoin O'Brien;Thomas Pickering;Thomas Pickering;Roland Asmar;Martin Myers;Martin Myers

  • European Society of Hypertension Practice Guidelines for home blood pressure monitoring

    G. Parati;G. S. Stergiou;R. Asmar;G. Bilo

  • Influence of age, risk factors, and cardiovascular and renal disease on arterial stiffness: Clinical applications

    Athanase Benetos;Bernard Waeber;Joseph Izzo;Gary Mitchell

  • Practice guidelines for primary care physicians: 2003 ESH/ESC hypertension guidelines.

    R. Cifkova;S. Erdine;R. Fagard;C. Farsang

  • Oral Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in Long-Term Treatment of Hypertensive Patients

    Hans R. Brunner;Haralambos Gavras;Bernard Waeber;Glen R. Kershaw

  • Hypertension A Disease of the Microcirculation

    François Feihl;Lucas Liaudet;Bernard Waeber;Bernard I. Levy

  • Oral administration of DuP 753, a specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist, to normal male volunteers. Inhibition of pressor response to exogenous angiotensin I and II.

    Y. Christen;B. Waeber;J. Nussberger;M. Porchet

  • Antihypertensive therapy with MK 421: angiotensin II--renin relationships to evaluate efficacy of converting enzyme blockade.

    Jerôme Biollaz;Hans R. Brunner;Irène Gavras;Bernard Waeber

  • Conduit artery compliance and distensibility are not necessarily reduced in hypertension.

    D Hayoz;B Rutschmann;F Perret;M Niederberger

  • Determinants of angiotensin II generation during converting enzyme inhibition.

    L Juillerat;J Nussberger;J Ménard;V Mooser

  • Salt-dependent renal effects of an angiotensin II antagonist in healthy subjects.

    Michel Burnier;Blaise Rutschmann;Jurg Nussberger;Joan Versaggi

  • ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFECT OF THE NEW ORAL ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITOR "MK-421".

    Haralambos Gavras;Bernard Waeber;Irene Gavras;Jerome Biollaz

  • Reproducibility of laser Doppler imaging of skin blood flow as a tool to assess endothelial function.

    Sandrine Kubli;Bernard Waeber;Anne Dalle-Ave;François Feihl

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans R. Brunner
Hans R. Brunner University of Lausanne
Michel Burnier
Michel Burnier University of Lausanne
Lucas Liaudet
Lucas Liaudet University of Lausanne
Luis M. Ruilope
Luis M. Ruilope European University of Madrid
Haralambos Gavras
Haralambos Gavras Boston University
Gérard Waeber
Gérard Waeber University of Lausanne
Alberto Zanchetti
Alberto Zanchetti University of Milan
Pascal Nicod
Pascal Nicod University Hospital of Lausanne
Giuseppe Mancia
Giuseppe Mancia University of Milano-Bicocca
Stéphane Laurent
Stéphane Laurent Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and advanced pathways is increasingly common for those interested in medicine and healthcare careers in the USA. Many aspiring nurses and practitioners are considering online programs for their flexibility and speed, providing fast-track options to career advancement.

For those aiming to advance to leadership roles, the fastest dnp online program options can help you earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree in a shorter time. Some prospective students are also looking for the easiest dnp program online to balance academic demands with work and life commitments.

If you’re eager to enter the workforce quickly, fast track medical programs like online Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) courses offer a accelerated route. For those interested in mental health, there are also online pmhnp programs that allow you to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner in less time.

These online healthcare degrees and certifications open new career opportunities while allowing learners to balance professional, academic, and personal responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard Waeber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles