World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 68 2445 2322 92 88 158 14396

Lies H. Hoefsloot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lies H. Hoefsloot between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lies H. Hoefsloot published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2013. 10 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2013. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 2 publications
1988 2026

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lies H. Hoefsloot: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 5
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 3
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 6
2003 7
2004 4
2005 6
2006 7
2007 7
2008 6
2009 5
2010 14
2011 14
2012 15
2013 19
2014 10
2015 9
2016 5
2017 3
2018 3
2019 4
2020 3
2021 2
2022 6
2023 6
2024 5
2025 8
2026 2
Total 197
Download as CSV

Lies H. Hoefsloot publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lies H. Hoefsloot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 155–164 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 158 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188 158
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Lies H. Hoefsloot D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lies H. Hoefsloot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164 68
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Lies H. Hoefsloot is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Ophthalmology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics, Genomics and Rare Diseases, Retinal Diseases and Treatments, RNA modifications and cancer, RNA Research and Splicing, Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies, and Corneal surgery and disorders.

Key papers authored or co-authored by Hoefsloot include:

  • Web-accessible application for identifying pathogenic transcripts with RNA-seq: Increased sensitivity in diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders (2023) published in The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • The potential diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing in pregnancies complicated by fetal ultrasound anomalies (2020) published in Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
  • Whole exome sequencing of known eye genes reveals genetic causes for high myopia (2022) published in Human Molecular Genetics
  • Noninvasive prenatal testing as compared to chorionic villus sampling is more sensitive for the detection of confined placental mosaicism involving the cytotrophoblast (2020) published in Prenatal Diagnosis
  • Early onset X-linked female limited high myopia in three multigenerational families caused by novel mutations in the ARR3 gene (2022) published in Human Mutation

Hoefsloot frequently collaborates with co-authors including Virginie J. M. Verhoeven, Martina Wilke, Marieke Joosten, Tjakko J. van Ham, and Karin E. M. Diderich. Their work has appeared repeatedly in several publication venues, notably Prenatal Diagnosis, Human Mutation, European Journal of Medical Genetics, Human Genetics, and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Best Publications

  • GJB2 mutations and degree of hearing loss: a multicenter study.

    Rikkert L. Snoeckx;Patrick L M Huygen;Delphine Feldmann;Sandrine Marlin

  • A post-hoc comparison of the utility of sanger sequencing and exome sequencing for the diagnosis of heterogeneous diseases

    Kornelia Neveling;Ilse Feenstra;Christian Gilissen;Lies H. Hoefsloot

  • Mutations in genes encoding subunits of RNA polymerases I and III cause Treacher Collins syndrome

    Johannes G. Dauwerse;Jill Dixon;Saskia Seland;Claudia A L Ruivenkamp

  • Novel PTEN mutations in patients with Cowden disease: absence of clear genotype-phenotype correlations.

    M R Nelen;H Kremer;I B Konings;F Schoute

  • Next-generation genetic testing for retinitis pigmentosa.

    Kornelia Neveling;Rob W.J. Collin;Christian Gilissen;Ramon A.C. van Huet

  • CHD7 mutations and CHARGE syndrome: the clinical implications of an expanding phenotype

    J E H Bergman;N Janssen;L H Hoefsloot;M C J Jongmans

  • SDHAF2 mutations in familial and sporadic paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma

    Jean Pierre Bayley;Henricus P.M. Kunst;Alberto Cascon;Maria Lourdes Sampietro

  • PTEN mutation in a family with Cowden syndrome and autism.

    Aleide Goffin;Lies H. Hoefsloot;Ermanno Bosgoed;Ann Swillen

  • Mutation update on the CHD7 gene involved in CHARGE syndrome

    Nicole Janssen;Jorieke E. H. Bergman;Morris A. Swertz;Lisbeth Tranebjaerg

  • Next-Generation Sequencing of a 40 Mb Linkage Interval Reveals TSPAN12 Mutations in Patients with Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy

    Konstantinos Nikopoulos;Christian Gilissen;Alexander Hoischen;C. Erik van Nouhuys

  • Identification of 51 Novel Exons of the Usher Syndrome Type 2A (USH2A) Gene That Encode Multiple Conserved Functional Domains and That Are Mutated in Patients with Usher Syndrome Type II

    Erwin van Wijk;Ronald J.E. Pennings;Heleen te Brinke;Annemarie Claassen

  • Clinical and molecular genetic characteristics of patients with cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis.

    Aad Verrips;Lies H. Hoefsloot;Gerry C. H. Steenbergen;Joop P. Theelen

  • Mutations in the pre-replication complex cause Meier-Gorlin syndrome

    Louise S Bicknell;Ernie M H F Bongers;Andrea Leitch;Stephen Brown

  • Distinct cytoplasmic regions of the human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor involved in induction of proliferation and maturation

    Fan Dong;C. van Buitenen;K. Pouwels;Lies Hoefsloot

  • The DFNB31 gene product whirlin connects to the Usher protein network in the cochlea and retina by direct association with USH2A and VLGR1

    Erwin van Wijk;Bert van der Zwaag;Theo Peters;Ulrike Zimmermann

  • CHD7 mutations in patients initially diagnosed with Kallmann syndrome – the clinical overlap with CHARGE syndrome

    M. C. J. Jongmans;C. M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts;N. Pitteloud;T. Ogata

  • CYP21 gene mutation analysis in 198 patients with 21-hydroxylase deficiency in the Netherlands: Six novel mutations and a specific cluster of four mutations

    Nike M. M. L. Stikkelbroeck;Lies H. Hoefsloot;Ilse J. de Wijs;Barto J. Otten

  • Primary structure and processing of lysosomal alpha-glucosidase; homology with the intestinal sucrase-isomaltase complex.

    L. H. Hoefsloot;M. Hoogeveen-Westerveld;M. A. Kroos;J. Van Beeumen

  • L1 retrotransposition can occur early in human embryonic development

    José A.J.M. van den Hurk;Iwan C. Meij;Maria del Carmen Seleme;Hiroki Kano

  • Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Late-onset Stargardt's Disease

    Sarah C. Westeneng-van Haaften;Camiel J.F. Boon;Frans P.M. Cremers;Lies H. Hoefsloot

Frequent Co-Authors

Hannie Kremer
Hannie Kremer Radboud University
Frans P.M. Cremers
Frans P.M. Cremers Radboud University
Cor W. R. J. Cremers
Cor W. R. J. Cremers Radboud University
Carel B. Hoyng
Carel B. Hoyng Radboud University
Rob W.J. Collin
Rob W.J. Collin Radboud University
Anneke I. den Hollander
Anneke I. den Hollander Radboud University
Nine V.A.M. Knoers
Nine V.A.M. Knoers University Medical Center Groningen
Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts University Medical Center Groningen
Han G. Brunner
Han G. Brunner Radboud University
Helger G. Yntema
Helger G. Yntema Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens diverse doors, both academically and professionally. Many students start their careers with foundational programs such as accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid. These programs provide practical skills and can lead to entry-level positions in the medical field while supporting further study in life sciences.

If you’re eager to advance quickly, consider a fast track degree. These accelerated programs allow motivated learners to earn a qualification in less time, helping you jump-start your genetics or medical career.

Flexibility is also important. Accredited self paced online colleges let you tailor your education around work or family commitments, making higher education accessible wherever you are.

For students searching for affordability, there are best online colleges with no application fee. These institutions remove financial barriers, allowing you to apply and pursue your genetics goals with less risk and lower upfront costs.

Best Scientists Citing Lies H. Hoefsloot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles