World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts

Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
53
Citations
9353
World Ranking
3734
National Ranking
133

Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 117 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with specific contributions to Medicine. The scholar's work concentrates mainly on Genetics and Molecular Biology, with further interests in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cell Biology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The research topics explored include:

  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Cellular transport and secretion

Frequent collaborators in their scientific work include:

  • Aafke Engwerda
  • Wilhelmina S. Kerstjens-Frederikse
  • Trijnie Dijkhuizen
  • Eleana Rraku
  • Morris A. Swertz

Publication venues where they have frequently contributed are:

  • European Journal of Medical Genetics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • European Journal of Human Genetics

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Phelan-McDermid syndrome: a classification system after 30 years of experience," 2022, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
  • "Neurodegenerative VPS41 variants inhibit HOPS function and mTORC1-dependent TFEB/TFE3 regulation," 2021, EMBO Molecular Medicine
  • "DLG4-related synaptopathy: a new rare brain disorder," 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • "Loss-of-function and missense variants in NSD2 cause decreased methylation activity and are associated with a distinct developmental phenotype," 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • "Definition and clinical variability of SHANK3-related Phelan-McDermid syndrome," 2023, European Journal of Medical Genetics

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic Genome Profiling in Mental Retardation

    Bert B.A. de Vries;Rolph Pfundt;Martijn Leisink;David A. Koolen

  • Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization for the Genomewide Detection of Submicroscopic Chromosomal Abnormalities

    Lisenka E.L.M. Vissers;Bert B.A. de Vries;Kazutoyo Osoegawa;Irene M. Janssen

  • Mutations in the transmembrane natriuretic peptide receptor NPR-B impair skeletal growth and cause acromesomelic dysplasia, type Maroteaux

    Cynthia F. Bartels;Hülya Bükülmez;Hülya Bükülmez;Pius Padayatti;David K. Rhee

  • Disorders of sex development: insights from targeted gene sequencing of a large international patient cohort

    Stefanie Eggers;Simon Sadedin;Jocelyn A. van den Bergen;Gorjana Robevska

  • De novo mutations in the actin genes ACTB and ACTG1 cause Baraitser-Winter syndrome

    Jean-Baptiste Rivière;Bregje W. M. van Bon;Alexander Hoischen;Stanislav S. Kholmanskikh

  • Alterations in the ankyrin domain of TRPV4 cause congenital distal SMA, scapuloperoneal SMA and HMSN2C

    Michaela Auer-Grumbach;Andrea Olschewski;Lea Papić;Hannie Kremer

  • The genomic landscape of balanced cytogenetic abnormalities associated with human congenital anomalies

    Claire Redin;Claire Redin;Harrison Brand;Harrison Brand;Ryan L Collins;Ryan L Collins;Tammy Kammin

  • Mutation update on the CHD7 gene involved in CHARGE syndrome

    Nicole Janssen;Jorieke E. H. Bergman;Morris A. Swertz;Lisbeth Tranebjaerg

  • GRIN2A-related disorders : genotype and functional consequence predict phenotype

    Vincent Strehlow;Henrike O Heyne;Henrike O Heyne;Henrike O Heyne;Danique R M Vlaskamp;Katie F M Marwick

  • SYNGAP1 encephalopathy: A distinctive generalized developmental and epileptic encephalopathy.

    Danique R.M. Vlaskamp;Benjamin J. Shaw;Rosemary Burgess;Davide Mei

  • Nine patients with a microdeletion 15q11.2 between breakpoints 1 and 2 of the Prader-Willi critical region, possibly associated with behavioural disturbances.

    Marianne Doornbos;Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz;Claudia A. L. Ruijvenkamp;Trijnie Dijkhuizen

  • Further molecular and clinical delineation of co-locating 17p13.3 microdeletions and microduplications that show distinctive phenotypes

    Damien L. Bruno;Britt Marie Anderlid;Anna Lindstrand;Conny Van Ravenswaaij-Arts

  • Genotype-phenotype mapping of chromosome 18q deletions by high-resolution array CGH : An update of the phenotypic map

    Ilse Feenstra;Lisenka E. L. M. Vissers;Mirjam Orsel;Ad Geurts van Kessel

  • Definition of a Critical Region on Chromosome 18 for Congenital Aural Atresia by ArrayCGH

    Joris A. Veltman;Yvonne Jonkers;Inge Nuijten;Irene Janssen

  • Recommendations for reporting results of diagnostic genetic testing (biochemical, cytogenetic and molecular genetic).

    Mireille Claustres;Viktor Kožich;Els Dequeker;Brain Fowler

  • Rapid Targeted Genomics in Critically Ill Newborns

    Cleo C van Diemen;Wilhelmina S Kerstjens-Frederikse;Klasien A Bergman;Tom J de Koning;Tom J de Koning

  • Diagnostic Interpretation of Array Data Using Public Databases and Internet Sources

    Nicole de Leeuw;Trijnie Dijkhuizen;Jayne Y. Hehir-Kwa;Nigel P. Carter

  • Clinical and cytogenetic characterization of 13 Dutch patients with deletion 9p syndrome: Delineation of the critical region for a consensus phenotype

    Marielle E. M. Swinkels;Annet Simons;Dominique F. Smeets;Lisenka E. Vissers

  • Improving the diagnostic yield of exome- sequencing by predicting gene–phenotype associations using large-scale gene expression analysis

    Patrick Deelen;Sipko van Dam;Johanna C Herkert;Juha M Karjalainen

  • CHD7, the gene mutated in CHARGE syndrome, regulates genes involved in neural crest cell guidance

    Yvonne Schulz;Peter Wehner;Lennart Opitz;Gabriela Salinas-Riester

Frequent Co-Authors

Lies H. Hoefsloot
Lies H. Hoefsloot Erasmus University Rotterdam
Han G. Brunner
Han G. Brunner Radboud University
Rolph Pfundt
Rolph Pfundt Radboud University
Dominique Smeets
Dominique Smeets Radboud University
Morris A. Swertz
Morris A. Swertz University Medical Center Groningen
Richard J. Sinke
Richard J. Sinke University Medical Center Groningen
Ad Geurts van Kessel
Ad Geurts van Kessel Radboud University
Joris A. Veltman
Joris A. Veltman University of Edinburgh
Bert B.A. de Vries
Bert B.A. de Vries Radboud University
Tjitske Kleefstra
Tjitske Kleefstra Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics opens doors to a variety of online degrees and diverse career options in healthcare and research. Many students interested in Genetics also explore fields like medical billing, nursing, and healthcare administration—each with its own unique pathways and benefits.

For those seeking administrative roles, online programs in healthcare administration programs are popular for their flexibility and accelerated options. If affordability is a key concern, consider reviewing some of the online healthcare administration degree options to help manage educational costs.

Exploring allied health roles, entry routes such as what is the easiest nursing program to get into can be a practical consideration. Alternatively, the medical coding field offers a quick entry into healthcare, and understanding how much does it cost to become a medical coder can help you plan a cost-effective pathway.

By researching these related programs, students can find the route that best suits their ambitions alongside a Genetics focus, whether it's in direct patient care, administration, or health informatics.

Best Scientists Citing Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles