World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dominique Smeets

Dominique Smeets

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
62
Citations
12135
World Ranking
2994
National Ranking
107

Dominique Smeets publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominique Smeets sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 171 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Dominique Smeets D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominique Smeets sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dominique Smeets is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. The research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on Medicine. Their scholarly work further narrows down into subfields such as Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, as well as Reproductive Medicine.

Their scientific contributions concentrate on several main topics including genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, prenatal screening and diagnostics, genetic and clinical aspects of sex determination and chromosomal abnormalities, sperm and testicular function, chromosomal and genetic variations, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and sexual differentiation and disorders.

Among Dominique Smeets' recent publications are:

  • Optical genome mapping enables constitutional chromosomal aberration detection, 2021, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Next-generation cytogenetics: Comprehensive assessment of 52 hematological malignancy genomes by optical genome mapping, 2021, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Why are some patients with 45,X Turner syndrome fertile? A young girl with classical 45,X Turner syndrome and a cryptic mosaicism in the ovary, 2020, Fertility and Sterility
  • Next generation cytogenetics: comprehensive assessment of 48 leukemia genomes by genome imaging, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Next generation cytogenetics: genome-imaging enables comprehensive structural variant detection for 100 constitutional chromosomal aberrations in 85 samples, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent coauthors in Dominique Smeets' research network include:

  • Tuomo Mantere
  • Kornelia Neveling
  • Alexander Hoischen
  • Guillaume van der Zande
  • Ellen Kater-Baats

The scholar's research is often published in venues such as:

  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Prenatal Diagnosis

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic Genome Profiling in Mental Retardation

    Bert B.A. de Vries;Rolph Pfundt;Martijn Leisink;David A. Koolen

  • Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization for the Genomewide Detection of Submicroscopic Chromosomal Abnormalities

    Lisenka E.L.M. Vissers;Bert B.A. de Vries;Kazutoyo Osoegawa;Irene M. Janssen

  • Nijmegen breakage syndrome

    C.J.A.M. van der Burgt;K.H. Chrzanowska;D.F.C.M. Smeets;C.M.R. Weemaes

  • Positional cloning of the gene for Nijmegen breakage syndrome.

    Shinya Matsuura;Hiroshi Tauchi;Asako Nakamura;Noriko Kondo

  • Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome. The International Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Study Group.

    J.A.P. Hiel;C.M.R. Weemaes;L.P.W.J. van den Heuvel;B.G.M. van Engelen

  • TRIDENT-2 : National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands

    Karuna R.M. van der Meij;Erik A. Sistermans;Merryn V.E. Macville;Servi J.C. Stevens

  • Array analysis and karyotyping: Workflow consequences based on a retrospective study of 36,325 patients with idiopathic developmental delay in the Netherlands

    Ron Hochstenbach;Ellen van Binsbergen;John Engelen;Aggie Nieuwint

  • High-throughput analysis of subtelomeric chromosome rearrangements by use of array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

    Joris A. Veltman;Eric F.P.M. Schoenmakers;Bert H. Eussen;Irene Janssen

  • DNA hypomethylation and unusual chromosome instability in cell lines from ICF syndrome patients

    C.M. Tuck-Muller;A. Narayan;F. Tsien;D.F.C.M. Smeets

  • Establishment and characterization of a human melanoma cell line (MV3) which is highly metastatic in nude mice.

    Goos N. P. van Muijen;Kees F. J. Jansen;Ine M. H. A. Cornelissen;Dominique F. C. M. Smeets

  • Genomic microarrays in mental retardation: a practical workflow for diagnostic applications.

    David A. Koolen;Rolph Pfundt;Nicole de Leeuw;Jayne Y. Hehir-Kwa

  • Screening for subtelomeric rearrangements in 210 patients with unexplained mental retardation using multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA)

    D A Koolen;W M Nillesen;M H A Versteeg;G F M Merkx

  • Mutations in ZBTB24 are associated with immunodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies syndrome type 2

    Jessica C. de Greef;Jun Wang;Judit Balog;Johan T. den Dunnen

  • Interphase cytogenetics of hematological cancer: comparison of classical karyotyping and in situ hybridization using a panel of eleven chromosome specific DNA probes.

    Pino J. Poddighe;Olof Moesker;Dominique Smeets;Baha H. Awwad

  • Clinical spectrum of ataxia-telangiectasia in adulthood

    M. M. M. Verhagen;W. F. Abdo;M. A. A. P. Willemsen;F. B. L. Hogervorst

  • Presence of ATM protein and residual kinase activity correlates with the phenotype in ataxia-telangiectasia: a genotype-phenotype study.

    Mijke M. M. Verhagen;Frans B. L. Hogervorst;Dominique F. C. M. Smeets

  • Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human sarcomas: II. Identification of novel amplicons at 6p and 17p in osteosarcomas

    Anne Forus;Anne Forus;Daniël Olde Weghuis;Dominique Smeets;Øystein Fodstad

  • Microdeletions of the Y chromosome and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: from gene to clinic.

    J. A. M. Kremer;J. H. A. M. Tuerlings;E. J. H. Meuleman;F. Schoute

  • Optical genome mapping enables constitutional chromosomal aberration detection

    Tuomo Mantere;Tuomo Mantere;Kornelia Neveling;Céline Pebrel-Richard;Marion Benoist

  • Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome in cousins from a family with a translocation between chromosomes 6 and 15.

    D. F. C. M. Smeets;B. C. J. Hamel;M. R. Nelen;H. J. M. Smeets

Frequent Co-Authors

Ad Geurts van Kessel
Ad Geurts van Kessel Radboud University
Han G. Brunner
Han G. Brunner Radboud University
Joris A. Veltman
Joris A. Veltman University of Edinburgh
Ben C. J. Hamel
Ben C. J. Hamel Radboud University
David A. Koolen
David A. Koolen Radboud University
Erik A. Sistermans
Erik A. Sistermans University of Amsterdam
Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts University Medical Center Groningen
Mitsuo Oshimura
Mitsuo Oshimura Tottori University
Nine V.A.M. Knoers
Nine V.A.M. Knoers University Medical Center Groningen
Rolph Pfundt
Rolph Pfundt Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online healthcare degrees and fast-track career options. For those interested in nursing, you can consider reputable rn to bsn online programs without clinicals. These programs let you upskill from registered nurse to bachelor’s level without traditional in-person clinical components, making it suitable for working professionals.

Ambitious nurses aiming for advanced practice roles can look into the quickest dnp program, which can help accelerate your academic journey. Additionally, those seeking a flexible and less research-intensive doctorate may benefit from online dnp programs without dissertation.

If you prefer an entry-level, hands-on healthcare role, medical assistant training programs offer pathways to join the workforce in as little as six weeks. These diverse options support individualized career growth, whether you’re advancing in your field or just getting started in genetics and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Dominique Smeets

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles