World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
7752
World Ranking
11947
National Ranking
158

Jian Su publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jian Su sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 73 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jian Su D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jian Su sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jian Su is affiliated with the Institute for Infocomm Research in Singapore. The scientist's research primarily spans the fields of Immunology and Microbiology, with a total of 174 publications in these areas. Subfields include Immunology, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, and Animal Science and Zoology.

Their research topics focus on several key areas, including:

  • Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
  • Interferon and immune responses
  • Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Jian Su has contributed to a range of scientific publications, frequently publishing in several notable venues. The most common publication venues include:

  • Aquaculture (19 publications)
  • Fish & Shellfish Immunology (12 publications)
  • The Journal of Immunology (9 publications)
  • Frontiers in Immunology (8 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (5 publications)

Several recent papers demonstrate the scientist's contributions to understanding immune mechanisms and aquaculture applications. These include:

  • "Progresses on three pattern recognition receptor families (TLRs, RLRs and NLRs) in teleost," 2021, Developmental & Comparative Immunology
  • "Immune functions of phagocytic blood cells in teleost," 2021, Reviews in Aquaculture
  • "Plant-Produced Vaccines: Future Applications in Aquaculture," 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science
  • "The discovery of type IV interferon system revolutionizes interferon family and opens up a new frontier in jawed vertebrate immune defense," 2022, Science China Life Sciences
  • "β-glucan and anisodamine can enhance the immersion immune efficacy of inactivated cyprinid herpesvirus 2 vaccine in Carassius auratus gibelio," 2020, Fish & Shellfish Immunology

Jian Su often collaborates with several frequent co-authors. The most cited collaborators include:

  • Xingchen Huo (33 joint publications)
  • Chunrong Yang (31 joint publications)
  • Yong-An Zhang (21 joint publications)
  • Gailing Yuan (20 joint publications)
  • Wentao Zhu (19 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • Named Entity Recognition using an HMM-based Chunk Tagger

    GuoDong Zhou;Jian Su

  • Exploring Various Knowledge in Relation Extraction

    GuoDong Zhou;Jian Su;Jie Zhang;Min Zhang

  • Supervised and Traditional Term Weighting Methods for Automatic Text Categorization

    Man Lan;Chew Lim Tan;Jian Su;Yue Lu

  • A Phrase-Based Statistical Model for SMS Text Normalization

    AiTi Aw;Min Zhang;Juan Xiao;Jian Su

  • A Composite Kernel to Extract Relations between Entities with Both Flat and Structured Features

    Min Zhang;Jie Zhang;Jian Su;GuoDong Zhou

  • Recognizing names in biomedical texts: a machine learning approach

    Guodong Zhou;Jie Zhang;Jian Su;Dan Shen

  • A Joint Source-Channel Model for Machine Transliteration

    Haizhou Li;Min Zhang;Jian Su

  • Multi-Criteria-based Active Learning for Named Entity Recognition

    Dan Shen;Jie Zhang;Jian Su;Guodong Zhou

  • Coreference Resolution Using Competition Learning Approach

    Xiaofeng Yang;Guodong Zhou;Jian Su;Chew Lim Tan

  • Reasoning with Sarcasm by Reading In-Between

    Yi Tay;Anh Tuan Luu;Siu Cheung Hui;Jian Su

  • Effective Adaptation of Hidden Markov Model-based Named Entity Recognizer for Biomedical Domain

    Dan Shen;Jie Zhang;Guodong Zhou;Jian Su

  • Exploring Syntactic Features for Relation Extraction using a Convolution Tree Kernel

    Min Zhang;Jie Zhang;Jian Su

  • Enhancing HMM-based biomedical named entity recognition by studying special phenomena

    Jie Zhang;Dan Shen;Guodong Zhou;Jian Su

  • NLANGP at SemEval-2016 Task 5: Improving Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis using Neural Network Features

    Zhiqiang Toh;Jian Su

  • Predicting Discourse Connectives for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition

    Zhi-Min Zhou;Yu Xu;Zheng-Yu Niu;Man Lan

  • Entity Linking Leveraging Automatically Generated Annotation

    Wei Zhang;Jian Su;Chew Lim Tan;Wen Ting Wang

  • Entity linking with effective acronym expansion, instance selection and topic modeling

    Wei Zhang;Yan Chuan Sim;Jian Su;Chew Lim Tan

  • Recognition of protein/gene names from text using an ensemble of classifiers

    GuoDong Zhou;Dan Shen;Dan Shen;Jie Zhang;Jie Zhang;Jian Su

  • Natural Language Processing – IJCNLP 2005

    Robert Dale;Kam-Fai Wong;Jian Su;Oi Yee Kwong

  • An Entity-Mention Model for Coreference Resolution with Inductive Logic Programming

    Xiaofeng Yang;Jian Su;Jun Lang;Chew Lim Tan

Frequent Co-Authors

Chew Lim Tan
Chew Lim Tan National University of Singapore
Guodong Zhou
Guodong Zhou Soochow University
Min Zhang
Min Zhang Tsinghua University
Siu Cheung Hui
Siu Cheung Hui Nanyang Technological University
Yi Tay
Yi Tay Google (United States)
Sinno Jialin Pan
Sinno Jialin Pan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Haizhou Li
Haizhou Li Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Chin-Yew Lin
Chin-Yew Lin Microsoft Research Asia (China)
Yue M. Lu
Yue M. Lu Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Qiang Yang
Qiang Yang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA, several flexible online options can fit your background and goals. For those looking to start their education or shift fields, an online associate degree offers foundational training and entry-level skills, making it a practical choice for quick job market access.

Many students consider the long-term value of their educational investment. Certain masters degrees that are worth it in Computer Science and related fields are in high demand, opening doors to advanced roles with strong earning potential.

If affordability is a concern, it’s important to look into affordable online courses that can provide the same accredited curriculum at a lower cost. This helps you gain valuable credentials without significant debt.

For learners whose academic records present a challenge, there are also universities for low gpa that offer reputable programs and a second chance at pursuing a tech career. These pathways ensure Computer Science remains accessible to a diverse range of students.

Best Scientists Citing Jian Su

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles