World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
68
Citations
21235
World Ranking
2062
National Ranking
1043

Ralph Grishman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralph Grishman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 305 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ralph Grishman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralph Grishman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ralph Grishman is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research spans several areas within computer science, with a particular concentration on artificial intelligence.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

More specifically, their subfields of study involve:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology

Grishman's research covers multiple topics, including:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms

The scientist has contributed to academic literature in various venues, such as:

  • Computer Systems Science and Engineering
  • Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing
  • Computational Linguistics

Recent papers by Grishman and frequent coauthors include:

  • Lexicalized Dependency Paths Based Supervised Learning for Relation Extraction (2022), published in Computer Systems Science and Engineering
  • Employing Lexicalized Dependency Paths for Active Learning of Relation Extraction (2022), published in Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing
  • MUCking In, or Fifty Years in Information Extraction (2025), published in Computational Linguistics

One frequent coauthor associated with these works is Huiyu Sun.

Best Publications

  • Message Understanding Conference-6: a brief history

    Ralph Grishman;Beth Sundheim

  • Information Extraction: Techniques and Challenges

    Ralph Grishman

  • Joint Event Extraction via Recurrent Neural Networks

    Thien Huu Nguyen;Kyunghyun Cho;Ralph Grishman

  • Procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars

    S. Abney;S. Flickenger;C. Gdaniec;C. Grishman

  • A maximum entropy approach to named entity recognition

    Ralph Grishman;Andrew Eliot Borthwick

  • Discovering Relations among Named Entities from Large Corpora

    Takaaki Hasegawa;Satoshi Sekine;Ralph Grishman

  • Relation Extraction: Perspective from Convolutional Neural Networks

    Thien Huu Nguyen;Ralph Grishman

  • Refining Event Extraction through Cross-Document Inference

    Heng Ji;Ralph Grishman

  • Overview of the TAC 2010 Knowledge Base Population Track

    Heng Ji;Heng Ji;Ralph Grishman;Hoa Trang Dang;Kira Griffitt

  • Extracting Relations with Integrated Information Using Kernel Methods

    Shubin Zhao;Ralph Grishman

  • Event Detection and Domain Adaptation with Convolutional Neural Networks

    Thien Huu Nguyen;Ralph Grishman

  • The NomBank Project: An Interim Report

    Adam L. Meyers;Ruth Reeves;Catherine Macleod;Rachel Szekely

  • Knowledge Base Population: Successful Approaches and Challenges

    Heng Ji;Ralph Grishman

  • Computational linguistics : an introduction

    Ralph Grishman

  • Graph Convolutional Networks With Argument-Aware Pooling for Event Detection

    Thien Huu Nguyen;Ralph Grishman

  • Exploiting diverse knowledge sources via maximum entropy in named entity recognition

    Andrew Borthwick;John Sterling;Eugene Agichtein;Ralph Grishman

  • Using Document Level Cross-Event Inference to Improve Event Extraction

    Shasha Liao;Ralph Grishman

  • NYU: Description of the MENE Named Entity System as Used in MUC-7

    Andrew Borthwick;John Sterling;Eugene Agichtein;Ralph Grishman

  • Automatic acquisition of domain knowledge for Information Extraction

    Roman Yangarber;Ralph Grishman;Pasi Tapanainen;Silja Huttunen

  • Comlex Syntax: building a computational lexicon

    Ralph Grishman;Catherine Macleod;Adam Meyers

Frequent Co-Authors

Heng Ji
Heng Ji University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Thien Huu Nguyen
Thien Huu Nguyen University of Oregon
Dilek Hakkani-Tur
Dilek Hakkani-Tur University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mari Ostendorf
Mari Ostendorf University of Washington
Marc Snir
Marc Snir University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Alan Ritter
Alan Ritter Georgia Institute of Technology
Kathleen R. McKeown
Kathleen R. McKeown Columbia University
Nancy Ide
Nancy Ide Vassar College
Leo Joskowicz
Leo Joskowicz Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science and related fields opens up flexible and affordable pathways for learners worldwide. Many students begin with online associate degree programs, which can be completed in as little as six months. These programs provide fundamental knowledge and can serve as a stepping stone to a bachelor’s degree or entry-level job.

If you’re interested in the business side of technology or organizational management, pursuing an online business degree is a practical option. Business programs offered online cover essential topics such as leadership, entrepreneurship, and operations management.

For those seeking to minimize educational expenses, many cheap online universities provide accredited bachelor’s programs in a broad array of disciplines, including Computer Science and IT.

Students interested in technical skills such as software development, networking, or electronics can benefit from the cheapest online engineering degree options. These programs combine rigorous coursework with affordability, helping learners advance their technical careers without incurring large debts.

Best Scientists Citing Ralph Grishman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles