World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
28622
World Ranking
2432
National Ranking
1412

Robert L. Helmreich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Helmreich sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert L. Helmreich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Helmreich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert L. Helmreich is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. The academic record shows no recent publications, co-authors, or book publications listed for this researcher.

The available data does not specify particular fields or subfields of study related to their work. Likewise, there are no defined main topics documented in connection with their research output.

No recent papers, publication venues, or awards are recorded at this time. The absence of these records suggests a limited publicly accessible research footprint based on the current dataset.

This profile reflects only the data provided and does not include information beyond the documented details from the source.

Best Publications

  • Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents

    Janet Taylor Spence;Robert L. Helmreich

  • Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys

    J B Sexton;E J Thomas;R L Helmreich

  • Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert Helmreich;Joy Stapp

  • The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research

    John B Sexton;Robert L Helmreich;Torsten B Neilands;Kathy M. Rowan

  • On error management: lessons from aviation

    Robert L Helmreich

  • The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation.

    Robert L. Helmreich;Ashleigh C. Merritt;John A. Wilhelm

  • A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS)

    Janet T. Spence;Robert Helmreich;Joy Stapp

  • Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert L. Helmreich;Carole K. Holahan

  • Culture at Work in Aviation and Medicine: National, Organizational and Professional Influences

    Robert L. Helmreich;Ashleigh C. Merritt

  • Masculine Instrumentality and Feminine Expressiveness: Their Relationships with Sex Role Attitudes and Behaviors.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert L. Helmreich

  • Short forms of the Texas Social Behavior Inventory (TSBI), an objective measure of self-esteem

    Robert Helmreich;Joy Stapp

  • Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation.

    Robert L. Helmreich;H. Clayton Foushee

  • The effect of executive walk rounds on nurse safety climate attitudes: A randomized trial of clinical units

    Eric J Thomas;J Bryan Sexton;Torsten B Neilands;Allan Frankel

  • Impatience versus achievement strivings in the type A pattern: differential effects on students' health and academic achievement.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert L. Helmreich;Robert S. Pred

  • Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment.

    R. L. Helmreich;J. T. Spence;W. E. Beane;G. W. Lucker

  • A PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES QUESTIONNAIRE

    Robert L. Helmreich;Janet T. Spence;John A. Wilhelm

  • [Error, stress and teamwork in medicine and aviation. A cross-sectional study].

    Sexton Jb;Thomas Ej;Helmreich Rl

  • Managing human error in aviation.

    Robert L Helmreich

  • Translating teamwork behaviours from aviation to healthcare: development of behavioural markers for neonatal resuscitation

    Eric Thomas;J. B. Sexton;R. L. Helmreich

  • Teamwork and quality during neonatal care in the delivery room.

    Eric J. Thomas;J. B. Sexton;J. B. Sexton;R. E. Lasky;R. E. Lasky;R. L. Helmreich;R. L. Helmreich

  • Measuring safety culture in the ambulatory setting: the safety attitudes questionnaire--ambulatory version

    Isitri Modak;J. Bryan Sexton;Thomas R. Lux;Robert L. Helmreich

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet T. Spence
Janet T. Spence The University of Texas at Austin
Gro M. Sandal
Gro M. Sandal University of Bergen
Torsten B. Neilands
Torsten B. Neilands University of California, San Francisco
Karen A. Matthews
Karen A. Matthews University of Pittsburgh
Carole K. Holahan
Carole K. Holahan The University of Texas at Austin
Elliot Aronson
Elliot Aronson University of California, Santa Cruz
Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Phoebe C. Ellsworth University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Dieter Frey
Dieter Frey Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Peter M. Gollwitzer
Peter M. Gollwitzer New York University
Kay Deaux
Kay Deaux New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up diverse opportunities, especially in counseling and therapy. One popular path is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role in high demand across the United States. Those interested can pursue related programs through accredited online degrees, which offer flexibility and accessibility for working professionals or students.

Certification requirements for MFTs vary by location, so it's important to understand regional guidelines. For example, those seeking licensure in Arizona should review the Tucson mft certification requirements. Individuals aiming for practice in Oklahoma should familiarize themselves with the Tulsa mft certification requirements.

Prospective therapists in Virginia should consult the mft requirements in Virginia Beach, while those in the nation's capital need to consider the Washington DC mft education requirements. Staying informed on the latest standards ensures your education meets state criteria and sets you on the right path for a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Robert L. Helmreich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles