World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
20026
World Ranking
4304
National Ranking
2400

Janet T. Spence publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet T. Spence sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janet T. Spence D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet T. Spence sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association.
  • 1975 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Janet T. Spence is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Over the course of their career, they have been recognized with significant awards acknowledging their contributions to psychology and science.

Spence received the APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association in 2001. Earlier, in 1975, they were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Their research has been conducted within various fields and subfields of study, focusing on core topics in psychology. Although specific papers, coauthors, and publication venues are not listed, their affiliation and awards suggest a longstanding engagement in psychological research.

Spence's academic work appears to emphasize key thematic areas in psychology, supported by participation in major research communities. Their role at a prominent university further highlights a connection with both teaching and scholarly activities in this scientific discipline.

Best Publications

  • Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents

    Janet Taylor Spence;Robert L. Helmreich

  • Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert Helmreich;Joy Stapp

  • A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS)

    Janet T. Spence;Robert Helmreich;Joy Stapp

  • Workaholism: Definition, Measurement, and Preliminary Results

    Janet T. Spence;Ann S. Robbins

  • Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert L. Helmreich;Carole K. Holahan

  • Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory.

    Janet T. Spence

  • INSTRUMENTAL AND EXPRESSIVE TRAITS, TRAIT STEREOTYPES, AND SEXIST ATTITUDES What Do They Signify?

    Janet T. Spence;Camille E. Buckner

  • Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism.

    Janet T. Spence

  • Masculine Instrumentality and Feminine Expressiveness: Their Relationships with Sex Role Attitudes and Behaviors.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert L. Helmreich

  • CHAPTER 12 – The Motivational Components of Manifest Anxiety: Drive and Drive Stimuli1

    Janet Taylor Spence;Kenneth W. Spence

  • Achievement and achievement motives : psychological and sociological approaches

    Eva Dreikurus Ferguson;Janet T. Spence

  • THE ATTITUDES TOWARD WOMEN SCALE AND ATTITUDE CHANGE IN COLLEGE STUDENTS

    Janet T. Spence;Eugene D. Hahn

  • Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: a conceptual analysis and critique of current research.

    Janet T. Spence

  • Impatience versus achievement strivings in the type A pattern: differential effects on students' health and academic achievement.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert L. Helmreich;Robert S. Pred

  • Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment.

    R. L. Helmreich;J. T. Spence;W. E. Beane;G. W. Lucker

  • A PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES QUESTIONNAIRE

    Robert L. Helmreich;Janet T. Spence;John A. Wilhelm

  • Contemporary topics in social psychology

    John W. Thibaut;Janet Taylor Spence;Robert C. Carson;Jack Williams Brehm

  • Motivation, emotion, and personality

    Janet Taylor Spence;Carroll E. Izard

  • Psychological androgyny and sex role flexibility: A test of two hypotheses

    Robert L. Helmreich;Janet T. Spence;Carole K. Holahan

  • Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity

    Janet T. Spence

  • Psychological determinants of health and performance: the tangled web of desirable and undesirable characteristics.

    Ann S. Robbins;Janet T. Spence;Heather Clark

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Helmreich
Robert L. Helmreich The University of Texas at Austin
Kenneth W. Spence
Kenneth W. Spence University of Iowa
Carole K. Holahan
Carole K. Holahan The University of Texas at Austin
Karen A. Matthews
Karen A. Matthews University of Pittsburgh
Dieter Frey
Dieter Frey Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jack W. Brehm
Jack W. Brehm University of Kansas
Peter M. Gollwitzer
Peter M. Gollwitzer New York University
Kay Deaux
Kay Deaux New York University
Carroll E. Izard
Carroll E. Izard University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up several dynamic online pathways, particularly for those interested in becoming licensed mental health counselors. Different U.S. regions have unique certification requirements, so it's important to understand your local landscape.

For example, if you plan to work in Massachusetts, discover Boston mental health counselor certification requirements to get started on the right path. In New York, you'll want to review Buffalo mental health counselor certification requirements to ensure you meet state-specific licensure steps.

Beyond the Northeast, even cities such as Chandler in Arizona present their own standards to become a mental health counselor in Chandler. Similarly, if you are looking into opportunities in North Carolina, learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Charlotte.

Online psychology degrees not only provide flexibility but can also help you meet educational requirements in various states. Explore your options carefully, as these programs can set you up for roles in counseling, human services, and related fields with strong growth potential.

Best Scientists Citing Janet T. Spence

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles