World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4304 3976 2400 2167 117 20026

Janet T. Spence publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet T. Spence between 1962 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet T. Spence published across 56 years, from 1962 to 2017, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1980. 2 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1980. 1962: 3 publications 1963: 7 publications 1964: 4 publications 1965: 4 publications 1966: 5 publications 1967: 2 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 10 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications
1962 2017

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet T. Spence: publications per year, 1962 to 2017
Year Publications
1962 3
1963 7
1964 4
1965 4
1966 5
1967 2
1968 1
1969 1
1970 2
1971 3
1972 3
1973 2
1974 4
1975 3
1976 2
1977 1
1978 3
1979 7
1980 10
1981 6
1982 5
1983 6
1984 4
1985 4
1986 2
1987 4
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 4
1992 1
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 3
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 2
Total 121
Download as CSV

Janet T. Spence publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet T. Spence sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 117
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet T. Spence D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet T. Spence sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association.
  • 1975 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Janet T. Spence is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Over the course of their career, they have been recognized with significant awards acknowledging their contributions to psychology and science.

Spence received the APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association in 2001. Earlier, in 1975, they were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Their research has been conducted within various fields and subfields of study, focusing on core topics in psychology. Although specific papers, coauthors, and publication venues are not listed, their affiliation and awards suggest a longstanding engagement in psychological research.

Spence's academic work appears to emphasize key thematic areas in psychology, supported by participation in major research communities. Their role at a prominent university further highlights a connection with both teaching and scholarly activities in this scientific discipline.

Best Publications

  • Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents

    Janet Taylor Spence;Robert L. Helmreich

  • Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert Helmreich;Joy Stapp

  • A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS)

    Janet T. Spence;Robert Helmreich;Joy Stapp

  • Workaholism: Definition, Measurement, and Preliminary Results

    Janet T. Spence;Ann S. Robbins

  • Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert L. Helmreich;Carole K. Holahan

  • Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory.

    Janet T. Spence

  • INSTRUMENTAL AND EXPRESSIVE TRAITS, TRAIT STEREOTYPES, AND SEXIST ATTITUDES What Do They Signify?

    Janet T. Spence;Camille E. Buckner

  • Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism.

    Janet T. Spence

  • Masculine Instrumentality and Feminine Expressiveness: Their Relationships with Sex Role Attitudes and Behaviors.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert L. Helmreich

  • CHAPTER 12 – The Motivational Components of Manifest Anxiety: Drive and Drive Stimuli1

    Janet Taylor Spence;Kenneth W. Spence

  • Achievement and achievement motives : psychological and sociological approaches

    Eva Dreikurus Ferguson;Janet T. Spence

  • THE ATTITUDES TOWARD WOMEN SCALE AND ATTITUDE CHANGE IN COLLEGE STUDENTS

    Janet T. Spence;Eugene D. Hahn

  • Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: a conceptual analysis and critique of current research.

    Janet T. Spence

  • Impatience versus achievement strivings in the type A pattern: differential effects on students' health and academic achievement.

    Janet T. Spence;Robert L. Helmreich;Robert S. Pred

  • Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment.

    R. L. Helmreich;J. T. Spence;W. E. Beane;G. W. Lucker

  • A PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES QUESTIONNAIRE

    Robert L. Helmreich;Janet T. Spence;John A. Wilhelm

  • Contemporary topics in social psychology

    John W. Thibaut;Janet Taylor Spence;Robert C. Carson;Jack Williams Brehm

  • Motivation, emotion, and personality

    Janet Taylor Spence;Carroll E. Izard

  • Psychological androgyny and sex role flexibility: A test of two hypotheses

    Robert L. Helmreich;Janet T. Spence;Carole K. Holahan

  • Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity

    Janet T. Spence

  • Psychological determinants of health and performance: the tangled web of desirable and undesirable characteristics.

    Ann S. Robbins;Janet T. Spence;Heather Clark

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Helmreich
Robert L. Helmreich The University of Texas at Austin
Kenneth W. Spence
Kenneth W. Spence University of Iowa
Carole K. Holahan
Carole K. Holahan The University of Texas at Austin
Karen A. Matthews
Karen A. Matthews University of Pittsburgh
Dieter Frey
Dieter Frey Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jack W. Brehm
Jack W. Brehm University of Kansas
Peter M. Gollwitzer
Peter M. Gollwitzer New York University
Kay Deaux
Kay Deaux New York University
Carroll E. Izard
Carroll E. Izard University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up several dynamic online pathways, particularly for those interested in becoming licensed mental health counselors. Different U.S. regions have unique certification requirements, so it's important to understand your local landscape.

For example, if you plan to work in Massachusetts, discover Boston mental health counselor certification requirements to get started on the right path. In New York, you'll want to review Buffalo mental health counselor certification requirements to ensure you meet state-specific licensure steps.

Beyond the Northeast, even cities such as Chandler in Arizona present their own standards to become a mental health counselor in Chandler. Similarly, if you are looking into opportunities in North Carolina, learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Charlotte.

Online psychology degrees not only provide flexibility but can also help you meet educational requirements in various states. Explore your options carefully, as these programs can set you up for roles in counseling, human services, and related fields with strong growth potential.

Best Scientists Citing Janet T. Spence

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles