World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
22415
World Ranking
7364
National Ranking
3971

Jack W. Brehm publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack W. Brehm sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jack W. Brehm D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack W. Brehm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Jack W. Brehm was affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their career included contributions to academic research, although specific topics, papers, coauthors, and publication venues associated with their work were not documented in the available data.

In recognition of their professional standing, they were awarded the status of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1992.

The scientist's profile reflects a professional trajectory centered around their affiliation, with no additional recorded information regarding specific research fields, subfields, main topics of work, or book publications. The absence of detailed publication and collaboration records limits the overview of their academic footprint.

Jack W. Brehm is deceased, and the narrative of their career is presented in the past tense accordingly.

Best Publications

  • A theory of psychological reactance.

    Jack Williams Brehm

  • Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control

    Sharon S. Brehm;Jack Williams Brehm

  • Responses to Uncontrollable Outcomes: An Integration of Reactance Theory and the Learned Helplessness Model

    Camille B. Wortman;Jack W. Brehm

  • Explorations in cognitive dissonance.

    Jack Williams Brehm;Arthur Robert Cohen

  • Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives.

    Jack W. Brehm

  • The Intensity of Motivation

    Unknown

  • Perspectives on cognitive dissonance

    Robert A. Wicklund;Jack Williams Brehm

  • Trivialization: the forgotten mode of dissonance reduction.

    Linda Simon;Jeff Greenberg;Jack Brehm

  • Reactance Theory - 40 Years Later

    Anca M. Miron;Jack W. Brehm

  • Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance.

    Louis Schneider;Jack W. Brehm;Arthur R. Cohen

  • Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency Among Attitude Components.

    Theodore M. Newcomb;M. J. Rosenberg;C. I. Hovland;W. J. McGuire

  • Evidence That the Production of Aversive Consequences Is Not Necessary to Create Cognitive Dissonance

    Eddie Harmon-Jones;Jack W. Brehm;Jeff Greenberg;Linda Simon

  • Perceived difficulty, energization, and the magnitude of goal valence ☆

    Jack W Brehm;Rex A Wright;Sheldon Solomon;Linda Silka

  • Contemporary topics in social psychology

    John W. Thibaut;Janet Taylor Spence;Robert C. Carson;Jack Williams Brehm

  • The Intensity of Emotion

    Unknown

  • Energization and goal attractiveness.

    Rex A. Wright;Jack W. Brehm

  • Effect of a favor which reduces freedom.

    Jack W. Brehm;Ann H. Cole

  • Psychological Reactance: Theory and Applications

    Jack W. Brehm

  • Effect of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with the communicator.

    Stephen Worchel;Jack W. Brehm

  • The attractiveness of an eliminated choice alternative

    Jack W Brehm;Lloyd K Stires;John Sensenig;Janet Shaban

  • Direct and Implied Social Restoration of Freedom.

    Stephen Worchel;Jack W. Brehm

  • Social influence as a function of attempted and implied usurpation of choice.

    Jack W. Brehm;John Sensenig

  • Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance.

    C. N. Alexander;Jack W. Brehm;Arthur R. Cohen

Frequent Co-Authors

Rex A. Wright
Rex A. Wright University of North Texas
Jeff Greenberg
Jeff Greenberg University of Arizona
Robert A. Wicklund
Robert A. Wicklund The University of Texas at Austin
Nyla R. Branscombe
Nyla R. Branscombe University of Kansas
Carl I. Hovland
Carl I. Hovland Yale University
Beverly H. Brummett
Beverly H. Brummett Duke University
Sheldon Solomon
Sheldon Solomon Skidmore College
Camille B. Wortman
Camille B. Wortman Stony Brook University
Janet T. Spence
Janet T. Spence The University of Texas at Austin
Joel Cooper
Joel Cooper Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology opens up a wide range of possibilities beyond clinical practice. If you're wondering what can you do with a psychology major, the answer includes roles in counseling, human resources, marketing, education, and more. Many online programs provide the flexibility needed to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Psychology shares a close relationship with other social sciences. For those interested in a broader context, exploring social science course offerings can provide valuable interdisciplinary skills. It's also common to compare sociology and psychology similarities before choosing the right path, as both fields investigate human behavior from unique perspectives.

If you are considering a counseling career, seeking the best counseling degree programs in Baltimore or other regions can help you find accredited and respected online or hybrid degrees. With so many options, you can tailor your studies to fit your interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jack W. Brehm

Recently Published Articles