World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6863 6396 32 31 214 10746

Eva Jonas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eva Jonas between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eva Jonas published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2024. 26 of the 278 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2024. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 6 publications
1999 2025

278 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eva Jonas: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 2
2001 8
2002 5
2003 10
2004 7
2005 9
2006 6
2007 15
2008 13
2009 6
2010 7
2011 16
2012 8
2013 13
2014 5
2015 15
2016 17
2017 5
2018 10
2019 18
2020 18
2021 16
2022 7
2023 14
2024 20
2025 6
Total 278
Download as CSV

Eva Jonas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Jonas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 214 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 214
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eva Jonas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Jonas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eva Jonas is affiliated with the University of Salzburg in Austria and specializes primarily in psychology and social sciences. Their research encompasses multiple subfields, including social psychology, sociology and political science, applied psychology, clinical psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics addressed by their work include:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Coaching Methods and Impact
  • Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy

Eva Jonas has authored numerous papers, with recent notable publications including:

  • "Between Conspiracy Beliefs, Ingroup Bias, and System Justification: How People Use Defense Strategies to Cope With the Threat of COVID-19," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Existential threat as a challenge for individual and collective engagement: Climate change and the motivation to act," 2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • "Exploring the landscape of psychological threat: A cartography of threats and threat responses," 2021, Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • "From anxiety to action-Experience of threat, emotional states, reactance, and action preferences in the early days of COVID-19 self-isolation in Germany and Austria," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • ""One of these things is not like the others": The associations between dark triad personality traits, work attitudes, and work-related motivation," 2023, Personality and Individual Differences

Frequent publication venues for their work comprise Frontiers in Psychology, Organisationsberatung Supervision Coaching, Coaching | Theorie & Praxis, Journal of Environmental Psychology, and Consulting Psychology Journal.

Collaborative work is a significant aspect of Eva Jonas's research, with frequent co-authors including Johannes Klackl, Sandra J. Diller, Christina Mühlberger, Janine Stollberg, and Chiara Annika Jutzi.

Best Publications

  • Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information.

    Eva Jonas;Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Dieter Frey;Norman Thelen

  • Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach

    Eva Jonas;Ian McGregor;Johannes Klackl;Dmitrij Agroskin

  • The Scrooge Effect: Evidence that Mortality Salience Increases Prosocial Attitudes and Behavior

    Eva Jonas;Jeff Schimel;Jeff Greenberg;Tom Pyszczynski

  • Terror management and religion : Evidence that intrinsic religiousness mitigates worldview defense following mortality salience

    Eva Jonas;Peter Fischer

  • Psychological motives and political orientation--the left, the right, and the rigid: comment on Jost et al. (2003).

    Jeff Greenberg;Eva Jonas

  • The Role of Control Motivation in Mortality Salience Effects on Ingroup Support and Defense

    Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Thomas Fankhänel

  • Understanding psychological reactance: New developments and findings

    Christina Steindl;Eva Jonas;Sandra Sittenthaler;Eva Traut-Mattausch

  • The power of we: Evidence for group-based control

    Immo Fritsche;Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Catharina Ablasser;Magdalena Beyer

  • Selective exposure to information: the impact of information limits

    Peter Fischer;Eva Jonas;Dieter Frey;Stefan Schulz-Hardt

  • Psychological Defense in Anticipation of Anxiety Eliminating the Potential for Anxiety Eliminates the Effect of Mortality Salience on Worldview Defense

    Jeff Greenberg;Andy Martens;Eva Jonas;Donna Eisenstadt

  • Focus theory of normative conduct and terror-management theory: the interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment.

    Eva Jonas;Andy Martens;Daniela Niesta Kayser;Immo Fritsche

  • Mortality salience and the desire for offspring

    Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Peter Fischer;Nicolas Koranyi

  • Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms

    Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Daniela Niesta Kayser;Nicolas Koranyi

  • Collective Reactions to Threat: Implications for Intergroup Conflict and for Solving Societal Crises

    Immo Fritsche;Eva Jonas;Thomas Kessler

  • Giving Advice or Making Decisions in Someone Else’s Place: The Influence of Impression, Defense, and Accuracy Motivation on the Search for New Information

    Eva Jonas;Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Dieter Frey

  • Information search and presentation in advisor–client interactions

    Eva Jonas;Dieter Frey

  • Connecting terror management and dissonance theory: Evidence that mortality salience increases the preference for supporting information after decisions

    Eva Jonas;Jeff Greenberg;Dieter Frey

  • Culture, Self and the Emergence of Reactance: Is there a "Universal" Freedom?

    Eva Jonas;Verena Graupmann;Daniela Niesta Kayser;Mark Zanna

  • Die Theorie der kognizierten Kontrolle

    Dieter Frey;Eva Jonas

  • Confirmation Bias: Why Psychiatrists Stick to Wrong Preliminary Diagnoses

    R. Mendel;E. Traut-Mattausch;E. Jonas;S. Leucht

Frequent Co-Authors

Dieter Frey
Dieter Frey Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Immo Fritsche
Immo Fritsche Leipzig University
Peter Fischer
Peter Fischer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Tobias Greitemeyer
Tobias Greitemeyer University of Innsbruck
Jeff Greenberg
Jeff Greenberg University of Arizona
Stefan Schulz-Hardt
Stefan Schulz-Hardt University of Göttingen
Simone Kauffeld
Simone Kauffeld Technische Universität Braunschweig
Hongfei Du
Hongfei Du Beijing Normal University
Frank H. Wilhelm
Frank H. Wilhelm University of Salzburg
Mark P. Zanna
Mark P. Zanna University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to numerous related online degrees and professional pathways—many of which are closely linked to social work. Becoming a social worker in the United States requires meeting specific education and licensure standards, and these requirements may vary by state.

For example, learning about the requirements to be a social worker in Kansas reveals a focus on both classroom education and supervised fieldwork. In Kentucky, the Kentucky social work education requirements highlight the need for accredited degree programs and clear pathways for licensure at different levels.

If you are considering practice in a different region, the process in Louisiana may be different. The Louisiana social work education requirements outline the distinct state-specific standards. Likewise, the requirements to be a social worker in Maine emphasize the role of state-approved programs and practical experience.

Online psychology and social work degrees offer flexibility and accessibility, making it easier to meet these requirements while balancing other commitments. Be sure to review your state’s specific criteria as you chart your career path.

Best Scientists Citing Eva Jonas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles