World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefan Schulz-Hardt

Stefan Schulz-Hardt

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
8810
World Ranking
10352
National Ranking
494

Stefan Schulz-Hardt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Schulz-Hardt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stefan Schulz-Hardt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Schulz-Hardt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Ten years on: a review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being.

    Jan Alexander Häusser;Andreas Mojzisch;Miriam Niesel;Stefan Schulz-Hardt

  • Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information.

    Eva Jonas;Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Dieter Frey;Norman Thelen

  • Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality.

    Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Felix C. Brodbeck;Andreas Mojzisch;Rudolf Kerschreiter

  • Biased information search in group decision making.

    Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Dieter Frey;Carsten Lüthgens;Serge Moscovici

  • Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model.

    Felix C. Brodbeck;Rudolf Kerschreiter;Andreas Mojzisch;Stefan Schulz-HARDT

  • Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information.

    Unknown

  • Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking☆

    Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Marc Jochims;Dieter Frey

  • Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions

    Tobias Greitemeyer;Stefan Schulz-Hardt

  • The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision‐making groups: the effects of pre‐discussion dissent

    Felix C. Brodbeck;Rudolf Kerschreiter;Andreas Mojzisch;Dieter Frey

  • Selective exposure to information: the impact of information limits

    Peter Fischer;Eva Jonas;Dieter Frey;Stefan Schulz-Hardt

  • Giving Advice or Making Decisions in Someone Else’s Place: The Influence of Impression, Defense, and Accuracy Motivation on the Search for New Information

    Eva Jonas;Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Dieter Frey

  • Information Sampling and Group Decision Making: The Effects of an Advocacy Decision Procedure and Task Experience.

    Tobias Greitemeyer;Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Felix C. Brodbeck;Dieter Frey

  • Expectancy confirmation in spite of disconfirming evidence: The case of price increases due to the introduction of the Euro

    Eva Traut-Mattausch;Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Tobias Greitemeyer;Dieter Frey

  • Selective exposure and information quantity: how different information quantities moderate decision makers' preference for consistent and inconsistent information.

    Peter Fischer;Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Dieter Frey

  • Knowing others' preferences degrades the quality of group decisions.

    Andreas Mojzisch;Stefan Schulz-Hardt

  • Psychological effects of the Euro - Experimental research on the perception of salaries and price estimations

    Eva Jonas;Tobias Greitemeyer;Dieter Frey;Stefan Schulz-Hardt

  • Many Labs 5: Testing pre-data collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability

    Charles R. Ebersole;Maya B. Mathur;Erica Baranski;Diane-Jo Bart-Plange

  • Why groups perform better than individuals at quantitative judgment tasks: Group-to-individual transfer as an alternative to differential weighting

    Thomas Schultze;Andreas Mojzisch;Stefan Schulz-Hardt

  • How to achieve synergy in group decision making: Lessons to be learned from the hidden profile paradigm

    Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Andreas Mojzisch

  • Biased evaluation of information during discussion: Disentangling the effects of preference consistency, social validation, and ownership of information

    Andreas Mojzisch;Lilia Grouneva;Stefan Schulz‐Hardt

Frequent Co-Authors

Dieter Frey
Dieter Frey Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Andreas Mojzisch
Andreas Mojzisch University of Hildesheim
Tobias Greitemeyer
Tobias Greitemeyer University of Innsbruck
Eva Jonas
Eva Jonas University of Salzburg
Felix C. Brodbeck
Felix C. Brodbeck Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Peter Fischer
Peter Fischer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Oliver Christ
Oliver Christ University of Hagen
Oliver C. Schultheiss
Oliver C. Schultheiss University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Anna Dreber
Anna Dreber Stockholm School of Economics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Schulz-Hardt

Recently Published Articles