World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
7847
World Ranking
7523
National Ranking
358

Kai Sassenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kai Sassenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kai Sassenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kai Sassenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kai Sassenberg is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology in Germany. Their research primarily spans the social sciences and psychology, with numerous publications contributing to these fields. The scientist's work encompasses a variety of subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, applied psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics addressed in their research include social and intergroup psychology, misinformation and its impacts, behavioral health and interventions, the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, cultural differences and values, technology adoption and user behavior, and social media and politics.

Among recent representative papers authored or coauthored by Sassenberg are:

  • "Conspiracy Theories and Their Societal Effects During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2021) published in Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories" (2022) published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • "Pro-vaccination subjective norms moderate the relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions" (2021) published in British Journal of Health Psychology
  • "Multinational data show that conspiracy beliefs are associated with the perception (and reality) of poor national economic performance" (2022) published in European Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Anticipating and defusing the role of conspiracy beliefs in shaping opposition to wind farms" (2022) published in Nature Energy

Sassenberg frequently collaborates with a number of coauthors, including Kevin Winter, Lotte Pummerer, Lara Ditrich, Annika Scholl, and Matthew J. Hornsey. These collaborations span multiple studies and contribute to a breadth of understanding in social psychology and related disciplines.

The scientist has published regularly in several academic venues, with multiple contributions to Psychology Archives, European Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, PLoS ONE, and Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Best Publications

  • A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills

    Friedrich W. Hesse;Esther Care;Jürgen Buder;Kai Sassenberg

  • Don't stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming

    Kai Sassenberg;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Followers’ Achievement Goals

    Melvyn R. W. Hamstra;Nico W. Van Yperen;Barbara Wisse;Kai Sassenberg

  • Conspiracy Theories and Their Societal Effects During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Lotte Pummerer;Robert Böhm;Lau Lilleholt;Kevin Winter

  • Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats.

    Kai Sassenberg

  • Transformational-transactional leadership styles and follower's regulatory focus: Fit reduces followers' turnover intentions

    Melvyn R. W. Hamstra;Nico W. Van Yperen;Barbara Wisse;Kai Sassenberg

  • Does relationship quality matter in e-services? A comparison of online and offline retailing

    Gianfranco Walsh;Thorsten Hennig-Thurau;Thorsten Hennig-Thurau;Kai Sassenberg;Daniel Bornemann

  • Belonging mediates effects of student-university fit on well-being, motivation, and dropout intention.

    Michèle Suhlmann;Michèle Suhlmann;Kai Sassenberg;Kai Sassenberg;Benjamin Nagengast;Ulrich Trautwein

  • Why some groups just feel better: The regulatory fit of group power.

    Kai Sassenberg;Kai J. Jonas;James Y. Shah;Paige C. Brazy

  • The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility

    Kai Sassenberg;Naomi Ellemers;Daan Scheepers

  • Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence.

    Kai Sassenberg;Tom Postmes

  • Social power makes the heart work more efficiently: Evidence from cardiovascular markers of challenge and threat

    Daan Scheepers;Frank de Wit;Naomi Ellemers;Kai Sassenberg

  • Research in Social Psychology Changed Between 2011 and 2016: Larger Sample Sizes, More Self-Report Measures, and More Online Studies:

    Kai Sassenberg;Kai Sassenberg;Lara Ditrich

  • Interactions do not only tell us when, but can also tell us how: Testing process hypotheses by interaction

    Johann Jacoby;Kai Sassenberg

  • Group-based self-regulation: The effects of regulatory focus

    Kai Sassenberg;Karl-Andrew Woltin

  • Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category norms

    Kai Sassenberg;Margarete Boos

  • Attitude change in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication: Private self-awareness as mediator and moderator

    Kai Sassenberg;Margarete Boos;Sven Rabung

  • Introducing social media for knowledge management

    Nicole Behringer;Kai Sassenberg

  • The carry-over effect of competition: The impact of competition on prejudice towards uninvolved outgroups

    Kai Sassenberg;Gordon B. Moskowitz;Johann Jacoby;Nina Hansen

  • Computervermittelte Kommunikation in Organisationen

    Margarete Boos;Kai J. Jonas;Kai Sassenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Daan Scheepers
Daan Scheepers Leiden University
Naomi Ellemers
Naomi Ellemers Utrecht University
Barbara Wisse
Barbara Wisse University of Groningen
Nico W. Van Yperen
Nico W. Van Yperen University of Groningen
Friedrich W. Hesse
Friedrich W. Hesse Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Sabine Otten
Sabine Otten University of Groningen
Ulrike Cress
Ulrike Cress Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Gordon B. Moskowitz
Gordon B. Moskowitz Lehigh University
Korbinian Moeller
Korbinian Moeller University of Tübingen
Thomas Kessler
Thomas Kessler Friedrich Schiller University Jena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Psychology in the USA, there are a range of rewarding career pathways and flexible online degrees to explore. Many students pursue online bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Psychology, which can open doors in counseling, social work, research, or applied behavior analysis.

One popular specialization is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). Becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) requires a combination of academic credentials and field experience. The bcba certification requirements in Stockton highlight the need for graduate-level coursework in ABA, supervised practical experience, and passing the national BCBA exam.

Requirements may vary between locations. For example, Tampa bcba education requirements stress the importance of choosing an accredited graduate program and completing a practicum, while the process for becoming a bcba in Toledo includes additional steps for local licensure.

Aspiring professionals should also review bcba certification requirements in Tucson to understand region-specific expectations. With flexible online degree options, you can tailor your education and professional growth to fit your career goals in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Kai Sassenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles