World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 6929 6518 666 636 547 54068

Jill P. Pell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jill P. Pell between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jill P. Pell published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 22.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 74 publications in 2020. 57 of the 764 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 74. Peak 74 publications in 2020. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 7 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 62 publications 2020: 74 publications 2021: 74 publications 2022: 60 publications 2023: 62 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 54 publications 2026: 3 publications
1993 2026

764 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jill P. Pell: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 3
1997 5
1998 1
1999 7
2000 9
2001 11
2002 9
2003 14
2004 10
2005 8
2006 11
2007 15
2008 16
2009 13
2010 20
2011 14
2012 17
2013 20
2014 23
2015 23
2016 29
2017 33
2018 27
2019 62
2020 74
2021 74
2022 60
2023 62
2024 31
2025 54
2026 3
Total 764
Download as CSV

Jill P. Pell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill P. Pell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 547 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 547
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jill P. Pell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill P. Pell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Jill P. Pell is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research work primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, and General Health Professions.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Jill P. Pell has contributed to several peer-reviewed papers, including:

  • "Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021) published in the Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
  • "Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK Biobank participants" (2020) published in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  • "Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank" (2020) published in Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews
  • "Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank" (2020) published in BMC Medicine
  • "Is older age associated with COVID-19 mortality in the absence of other risk factors? General population cohort study of 470,034 participants" (2020) published in PLoS ONE

Frequent coauthors working alongside Jill P. Pell include:

  • Frederick K. Ho
  • Carlos Celis-Morales
  • Naveed Sattar
  • Daniel Mackay
  • Fanny Petermann-Rocha

The scientist commonly publishes research in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMC Medicine
  • BMJ Open
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
  • Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle

Jill P. Pell has been recognized with the award of Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2010.

Best Publications

  • UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age

    Cathie Sudlow;John Edward Gallacher;Naomi Allen;Valerie Beral

  • Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

    Gordon C S Smith;Jill P Pell

  • Pregnancy complications and maternal risk of ischaemic heart disease: a retrospective cohort study of 129,290 births.

    Gordon C S Smith;Jill P Pell;David Walsh

  • Evidence of Improving Prognosis in Heart Failure Trends in Case Fatality in 66 547 Patients Hospitalized Between 1986 and 1995

    K. MacIntyre;S. Capewell;S. Stewart;J.W.T. Chalmers

  • Associations of grip strength with cardiovascular, respiratory, and cancer outcomes and all cause mortality: prospective cohort study of half a million UK Biobank participants

    Carlos A Celis-Morales;Paul Welsh;Donald M Lyall;Lewis Steell

  • Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Fanny Petermann-Rocha;Fanny Petermann-Rocha;Fanny Petermann-Rocha;Viktoria Balntzi;Stuart R Gray;Jose Lara

  • Electronic health records to facilitate clinical research.

    Martin R. Cowie;Juuso I. Blomster;Juuso I. Blomster;Lesley H. Curtis;Sylvie Duclaux

  • Smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome

    Jill Pell;Sally Haw;Stuart M Cobbe;David E Newby

  • Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK Biobank participants.

    Miriam Mutambudzi;Claire Niedwiedz;Ewan Beaton Macdonald;Alastair Leyland

  • Genome-Wide Association Study of Blood Pressure Extremes Identifies Variant near UMOD Associated with Hypertension

    Sandosh Padmanabhan;Olle Melander;Toby Johnson;Anna Maria Di Blasio

  • Association between active commuting and incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality: prospective cohort study.

    Carlos A Celis-Morales;Donald M Lyall;Paul Welsh;Jana Anderson

  • Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy

    Gordon Cs Smith;Jill P Pell;Richard Bobbie

  • UK Biobank: Current status and what it means for epidemiology

    Naomi Allen;Cathie Sudlow;Paul Downey;Tim Peakman

  • Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank.

    Claire E. Hastie;Daniel F. Mackay;Frederick Ho;Carlos A. Celis-Morales

  • Gestational Age at Delivery and Special Educational Need: Retrospective Cohort Study of 407,503 Schoolchildren

    Daniel F. MacKay;Gordon C. S. Smith;Richard Dobbie;Jill P. Pell

  • Interpregnancy Interval and Risk of Preterm Birth and Neonatal Death: Retrospective Cohort Study

    Gordon C S Smith;Jill P Pell;Richard Dobbie

  • Genome-wide association study of cognitive functions and educational attainment in UK Biobank ( N =112 151)

    G. Davies;R. E. Marioni;R. E. Marioni;D. C. Liewald;W. D. Hill

  • Risk of Perinatal Death Associated With Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancies

    Gordon C. S. Smith;Jill P. Pell;Alan D. Cameron;Richard Dobbie

  • Teenage pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with first and second births: Population based retrospective cohort study

    Gordon C. S. Smith;Jill P. Pell

  • Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in west of Scotland: case ascertainment study

    Oliver Blatchford;Lindsay A Davidson;William R Murray;Mary Blatchford

Frequent Co-Authors

Naveed Sattar
Naveed Sattar University of Glasgow
Daniel J. Smith
Daniel J. Smith University of Edinburgh
Gordon C. S. Smith
Gordon C. S. Smith University of Cambridge
Jason M. R. Gill
Jason M. R. Gill University of Glasgow
Paul Welsh
Paul Welsh University of Glasgow
Rona J. Strawbridge
Rona J. Strawbridge University of Glasgow
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi University of Glasgow
Andrew M. McIntosh
Andrew M. McIntosh University of Edinburgh
Catharine R. Gale
Catharine R. Gale University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals often find that other healthcare degrees and career paths offer flexible alternatives or valuable complementary expertise. For example, future nurses can explore nursing school without teas test requirements, making admission less stressful and more accessible for many applicants.

If you are interested in the business side of healthcare, a health administration degree can open doors to management and leadership roles, preparing you to work efficiently in medical facilities, clinics, and hospitals.

Registered nurses looking to advance their careers can benefit from enrolling in adn to msn bridge programs, which provide a streamlined path to earning a master’s degree and qualifying for higher-level clinical or administrative positions.

Those passionate about diet, wellness, and holistic health may be interested in a nutritionist online degree to specialize in food science, counseling, or public health initiatives.

Exploring diverse online degrees and career pathways can help you tailor your education to your interests, schedule, and long-term goals in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Jill P. Pell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles